|
|
|
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:10:44 +0000,
group: uk.environment.conservation
back
How much?
Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 alien
species recorded are harmless"?.
Surely, with so many essential services in terminal decline, the
money could be better spent than chasing uncatchable aliens.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:10:44 +0000
author: unknown
|
Re: How much?
In article ,
amacmil304@aol.com writes
> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 âalien
>species recorded are harmless"?.
>
I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
"harmless".
> Surely, with so many essential services in terminal decline, the
>money could be better spent than chasing uncatchable aliens.
>
Surely, with so many species in terminal decline because of invasive
aliens, the money is being extremely well spent.
--
Malcolm
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000
author: Malcolm
|
Re: How much?
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
wrote:
>
>In article ,
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 alien
>>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>
>I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>"harmless".
No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>
>> Surely, with so many essential services in terminal decline, the
>>money could be better spent than chasing uncatchable aliens.
>>
>Surely, with so many species in terminal decline because of invasive
>aliens, the money is being extremely well spent.
There's not such thing as aliens on our planet - as far as I am aware.
The is just a term been recently stolen by the fake conservationists.
Man has the most damaging impact on our natural environment.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:36:54 +0000
author: unknown
|
Re: How much?
On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>
> wrote:
>
> >In article ,
> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>
> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
> >"harmless".
>
> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST)
author: John M.
|
Re: How much?
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."
wrote:
>On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article ,
>> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
>> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
>> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>
>> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>> >"harmless".
>>
>> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>
>Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
I think all are harmless. They just do their own thing.
There's a lot more to worry about and a lot better use for the money
than lining the pockets of these researchers.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:57:41 +0000
author: unknown
|
Re: How much?
In article ,
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article ,
>>> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
>>> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>>> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
>>> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>>
>>> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>>> >"harmless".
>>>
>>> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>>
>>Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
>
>I think all are harmless. They just do their own thing.
>
>There's a lot more to worry about and a lot better use for the money
>than lining the pockets of these researchers.
>
So, Angus, how much of the money being spent on (successfully) ridding
Northumberland of grey squirrels is "lining the pockets of researchers"?
You obviously think you know so you can tell us, can't you?
--
Malcolm
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:08:20 +0000
author: Malcolm
|
Re: How much?
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:08:20 +0000, Malcolm
wrote:
>
>In article ,
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >In article ,
>>>> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
>>>> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>>>> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
>>>> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>>>
>>>> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>>>> >"harmless".
>>>>
>>>> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>>>
>>>Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
>>
>>I think all are harmless. They just do their own thing.
>>
>>There's a lot more to worry about and a lot better use for the money
>>than lining the pockets of these researchers.
>>
>So, Angus, how much of the money being spent on (successfully) ridding
>Northumberland of grey squirrels is "lining the pockets of researchers"?
>
>You obviously think you know so you can tell us, can't you?
Any amount of money is too much for this.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:33:46 +0000
author: unknown
|
Re: How much?
In article ,
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:08:20 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >In article ,
>>>>> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
>>>>> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>>>>> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
>>>>> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>>>>
>>>>> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>>>>> >"harmless".
>>>>>
>>>>> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>>>>
>>>>Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
>>>
>>>I think all are harmless. They just do their own thing.
>>>
>>>There's a lot more to worry about and a lot better use for the money
>>>than lining the pockets of these researchers.
>>>
>>So, Angus, how much of the money being spent on (successfully) ridding
>>Northumberland of grey squirrels is "lining the pockets of researchers"?
>>
>>You obviously think you know so you can tell us, can't you?
>
>
>Any amount of money is too much for this.
>
So, is any money "lining the pockets of researchers" or is this just one
of your made up claims?
--
Malcolm
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:04:24 +0000
author: Malcolm
|
Re: How much?
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:04:24 +0000, Malcolm
wrote:
>
>In article ,
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:08:20 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Feb 10, 10:36 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:33:53 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >In article ,
>>>>>> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
>>>>>> >> Just how much the rather pointless research of compiling the Daisie
>>>>>> >>database costs the European taxpayer, when most of the 10, 677 "alien
>>>>>> >>species recorded are harmless"?.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I'm glad to see you are acknowledging that not all alien species are
>>>>>> >"harmless".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No I'm not. I'm quoting others.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does that mean that you agree, or disagree, with them about "most"?
>>>>
>>>>I think all are harmless. They just do their own thing.
>>>>
>>>>There's a lot more to worry about and a lot better use for the money
>>>>than lining the pockets of these researchers.
>>>>
>>>So, Angus, how much of the money being spent on (successfully) ridding
>>>Northumberland of grey squirrels is "lining the pockets of researchers"?
>>>
>>>You obviously think you know so you can tell us, can't you?
>>
>>
>>Any amount of money is too much for this.
>>
>So, is any money "lining the pockets of researchers" or is this just one
>of your made up claims?
Of course it is. There has been a lot of research into squirrels. Are
you saying there hasn't been?
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:29:02 +0000
author: unknown
|
|
|