On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:48:17 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>In article ,
>    wrote:
>
>
>> Malcolm Ogilvie aka Dr Thick is confused about his measure of
>> intelligence.
>
>> A Macmillan:  "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"
>
>> Dr Thick:  "What a contorted question. The answer is yes. What about
>> yourself
>
>> __________________
>
>
>Try to answer it yourself without deconstructing the question.


How do you mean "deconstruct the question"

Would you answer "yes" as well?


.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

> How do you mean "deconstruct the question"

> Would you answer "yes" as well?

I would have to deconstruct the question to answer it all as would
everyone if they thought it a worthwhile question at all..  If you don't
think so answer it  with a yes or no..

-- 
Regards from Bob Seago:  http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:35:14 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>
>
>
>> How do you mean "deconstruct the question"
>
>> Would you answer "yes" as well?
>
>I would have to deconstruct the question to answer it all as would
>everyone if they thought it a worthwhile question at all..  If you don't
>think so answer it  with a yes or no..

Why would you have to deconstruct it?  

It seems quite a simple question to me.

Is your mind not up to it?

Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article ,
    wrote:

> >I would have to deconstruct the question to answer it all as would
> >everyone if they thought it a worthwhile question at all..  If you don't
> >think so answer it  with a yes or no..

> Why would you have to deconstruct it?  

> It seems quite a simple question to me.

> Is your mind not up to it?

Go on then you show me how you answer it without deconstructing it.

-- 
Regards from Bob Seago:  http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:36:01 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>In article ,
>    wrote:
>
>> >I would have to deconstruct the question to answer it all as would
>> >everyone if they thought it a worthwhile question at all..  If you don't
>> >think so answer it  with a yes or no..
>
>> Why would you have to deconstruct it?  
>
>> It seems quite a simple question to me.
>
>> Is your mind not up to it?
>
>Go on then you show me how you answer it without deconstructing it.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:36:01 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>In article ,
>    wrote:
>
>> >I would have to deconstruct the question to answer it all as would
>> >everyone if they thought it a worthwhile question at all..  If you don't
>> >think so answer it  with a yes or no..
>
>> Why would you have to deconstruct it?  
>
>> It seems quite a simple question to me.
>
>> Is your mind not up to it?
>
>Go on then you show me how you answer it without deconstructing it.

It doesn't need "deconstructing" :-))

I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill.  You clearly don't
understand the question.  It's a simple question.  .

To save you looking back here's the question again.

"Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"




Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article ,
    wrote:


> It doesn't need "deconstructing" :-))

> I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill.  You clearly don't
> understand the question.  It's a simple question.  .

> To save you looking back here's the question again.

> "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"


So go on then and answer it yourself for the third and last time.

-- 
Regards from Bob Seago:  http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:20:46 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>In article ,
>    wrote:
>
>
>> It doesn't need "deconstructing" :-))
>
>> I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill.  You clearly don't
>> understand the question.  It's a simple question.  .
>
>> To save you looking back here's the question again.
>
>> "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"
>
>
>So go on then and answer it yourself for the third and last time.


I already have.  I do have limited intelligence.  

Work that out for yourself :-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)