On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:38:38 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:35:07 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:43:11 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>How many grey squirrels have you saved from being killed, Angus?
>>>>
>>>>I have no idea and neither do you. But I do get emails from people who
>>>>support greys and will not participate in advising red squirrel groups
>>>>where they see greys.  Good for them.
>>>>
>>>Then not only are they, like you, supporting the bringing to extinction
>>>of the red squirrel, they also aren't being very successful at
>>>protecting the greys in Northumberland, are they?
>>
>>It's very easy to kill but that doesn't mean greys will not come back
>>to the same population in a very short time.  All these people are
>>doing is wasting taxpayers' money because the reds are doomed anyway
>>according to Bristol University.
>>
>This may be the view of Professor Stephen Harris, but I am confident the 
>whole university doesn't believe that, despite your blatant attempt to 
>make it appear as if it does:-(
>

Well, he's an expert - unlike you :-)


>>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7206813.stm
>>>
>>>>>Or how
>>>>>many deer, remembering that you have been campaigning here against
>>>>>killing them for more than eight years?
>>>>
>>>>There is a significant shift against the shooting of deer of which I
>>>>play a very small part.
>>>>
>>>ROFL!!
>>>
>>
>>Since the ban on hunting with hounds, animal rights and welfare
>>organisations have turned their attention to the shooting industry.
>>
>So what?
>

Well, if it hadn't been for them, hunting wouldn't have been banned.  

So watch this space.


>>
>>>You are indulging in wishful thinking, Angus, especially as it is only a
>>>day or two after a call for a cull of Muntjac!
>>>
>>>>Don't worry about it, Malcolm.  Rome wasn't built in a day.
>>>>
>>>I think you've chosen the wrong analogy, Angus, as you so often do. The
>>>whole point about Rome is that although it took a long time to build, it
>>>was then sacked in just one day!
>>>
>>>So remember that as you so laboriously try and build Rome :-)
>>
>>As far as I know, Rome is still in existence :-))
>>
>And has been sacked a number of times.

But never destroyed.



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)