Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
postings.

Guess what?

He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
about with the same old trip he spews out here.

Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))

One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))


__________________________

Google Groups Alert for: Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk

Re: The new Scotchland manager makes his debut
Robert Henderson phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk scot politics In 
message , Malcolm
 writes 
In article , Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.
demon.co.uk> writes In message ,
...
scot.politics - Jan 29, 2008 by Robert Henderson - 8 message - 2
author 

Re: Here we go again!
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:38:56 +0000, Malcolm
 
wrote: In article , Robert Seago ...
From: 
Malcolm  Newsgroups:
uk.environment.conservation Subject: 

Re: Sustainability Scam Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:56:46 +0100
Organization: MAO ...
uk.environment.conservation - Jan 28, 2008 by - 17 message - 5 author 

Re: Scotchland "narrow, Presbyterian and racist"
In article , Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.
demon.co.uk> writes In message , 
Malcolm  writes Status quo. RH Why don't
you post 
the definition of "Scotchman", Rabbie? Scotchman: Inhabitant of
Scotchland. ...
scot.politics - Jan 29, 2008 by Robert Peffers - 37 message - 8 author
Re: Hey Ogilvie here's a shortcut to A levels at MacDonalds. Be ...
... Malcolm  wrote: In 
article ,
amacmil...@aol.com writes 
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:16:10 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote: 
In article ,
amacmil...@aol.com writes 
Well, Malcolm Ogilvie ...
uk.environment.conservation - Jan 28, 2008 by Adam Hart - 12 message -
5 author 

Re: The new Scotchland manager makes his debut
Robert Henderson phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk scot politics In 
message , Malcolm
 
writes ..... League cup winner, finalist UEFA Cup, six years in the
premiership. 
RH And as an international manager he was pathetic .... Presumably it
is him being ...
scot.politics - Jan 28, 2008 by Robert Henderson - 8 message - 2
author 

Re: "Not safe to walk the streets of London" - Home Secretary
In message , Malcolm
 
writes  writes There are no such people as
"Scotchmen", 
Rabbie. AJ Aitken reports in OCELang. (1992),'for working class Scots
the common 
form has long been Scotch ... and the native form Scots is ...
scot.politics - Jan 29, 2008 by Robert Peffers - 33 message - 5 author

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This once a day Google Alert is brought to you by Google. 


One day too many :-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
>postings.
>
>Guess what?
>
>He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
>about with the same old trip he spews out here.
>
>Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))
>
>One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))
>
And, once again, Angus tries to denigrate me because I continue to point 
out that so much of what he posts reveals his lack of knowledge on the 
subjects he chooses. He can't answer my criticisms with sensible 
arguments so rapidly surrenders by resorting to childish name calling . 
And if he really thought so little of me and really thought that I was 
having no effect on his campaigns, he would never respond to any of my 
posts, nor bother with his repeated attempts to denigrate me.

-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:53:37 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
>>postings.
>>
>>Guess what?
>>
>>He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
>>about with the same old trip he spews out here.
>>
>>Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))
>>
>>One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))
>>
>And, once again, Angus tries to denigrate me because I continue to point 
>out that so much of what he posts reveals his lack of knowledge on the 
>subjects he chooses. He can't answer my criticisms with sensible 
>arguments so rapidly surrenders by resorting to childish name calling . 
>And if he really thought so little of me and really thought that I was 
>having no effect on his campaigns, he would never respond to any of my 
>posts, nor bother with his repeated attempts to denigrate me.


I just take the p**s out of you, Malcolm.

You're an easy target :-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:53:37 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
>>>postings.
>>>
>>>Guess what?
>>>
>>>He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
>>>about with the same old trip he spews out here.
>>>
>>>Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))
>>>
>>>One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))
>>>
>>And, once again, Angus tries to denigrate me because I continue to point
>>out that so much of what he posts reveals his lack of knowledge on the
>>subjects he chooses. He can't answer my criticisms with sensible
>>arguments so rapidly surrenders by resorting to childish name calling .
>>And if he really thought so little of me and really thought that I was
>>having no effect on his campaigns, he would never respond to any of my
>>posts, nor bother with his repeated attempts to denigrate me.
>
>
>I just take the p**s out of you, Malcolm.
>
>You're an easy target :-))
>
And here you go again.

If you really thought that, you wouldn't bother, but I'm obviously 
achieving a great deal if all you can think to do is to try and 
denigrate me.


-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:48:06 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:53:37 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
>>>>postings.
>>>>
>>>>Guess what?
>>>>
>>>>He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
>>>>about with the same old trip he spews out here.
>>>>
>>>>Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))
>>>>
>>>>One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))
>>>>
>>>And, once again, Angus tries to denigrate me because I continue to point
>>>out that so much of what he posts reveals his lack of knowledge on the
>>>subjects he chooses. He can't answer my criticisms with sensible
>>>arguments so rapidly surrenders by resorting to childish name calling .
>>>And if he really thought so little of me and really thought that I was
>>>having no effect on his campaigns, he would never respond to any of my
>>>posts, nor bother with his repeated attempts to denigrate me.
>>
>>
>>I just take the p**s out of you, Malcolm.
>>
>>You're an easy target :-))
>>
>And here you go again.
>
>If you really thought that, you wouldn't bother, but I'm obviously 
>achieving a great deal if all you can think to do is to try and 
>denigrate me.

I don't need to.  You denigrate yourself.

But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
after time :-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>
>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>after time :-))
>
If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted 
again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise 
on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees, 
woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens, 
etc., etc., etc.

-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>
>>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>>after time :-))
>>
>If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted 
>again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise 
>on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees, 
>woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens, 
>etc., etc., etc.


No Malcolm.  It's quite the reverse.  If you look at the posting
history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.

I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.

But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
ng so you have no effect on what I do.   You're flattering yourself
again.

My main target audience is elsewhere.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>
>>>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>>>after time :-))
>>>
>>If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted
>>again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise
>>on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees,
>>woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens,
>>etc., etc., etc.
>
>
>No Malcolm.  It's quite the reverse.  If you look at the posting
>history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.
>
Of course I do. Your wild and unsubstantiated claims need challenging so 
that people are not taken in by them.

>I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.
>
And as you can't cope with such challenges, having made those claims 
without having the requisite facts or knowledge to back them up, you 
inevitably resort to childish name-calling and vain attempts to 
denigrate me, and anyone else who has the temerity to point out where 
you are wrong.

>But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
>ng so you have no effect on what I do.   You're flattering yourself
>again.
>
On the contrary. You spend an awful lot of time responding to me, asking 
me questions about my qualifications, or my private life, or criticising 
where I live.

>My main target audience is elsewhere.
>
So you keep saying, but, as you've just confessed, with remarkably 
little result.

-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:21:35 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>
>>>>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>>>>after time :-))
>>>>
>>>If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted
>>>again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise
>>>on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees,
>>>woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens,
>>>etc., etc., etc.
>>
>>
>>No Malcolm.  It's quite the reverse.  If you look at the posting
>>history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.
>>
>Of course I do. Your wild and unsubstantiated claims need challenging so 
>that people are not taken in by them.

You really are rather dim, Malcolm.  And after all this time.

>
>>I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.
>>
>And as you can't cope with such challenges, having made those claims 
>without having the requisite facts or knowledge to back them up, you 
>inevitably resort to childish name-calling and vain attempts to 
>denigrate me, and anyone else who has the temerity to point out where 
>you are wrong.

You really think that :-)

>
>>But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
>>ng so you have no effect on what I do.   You're flattering yourself
>>again.
>>
>On the contrary. You spend an awful lot of time responding to me, asking 
>me questions about my qualifications, or my private life, or criticising 
>where I live.
>

Sure I do.


>>My main target audience is elsewhere.
>>
>So you keep saying, but, as you've just confessed, with remarkably 
>little result.

:-))

Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:21:35 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>
>>>>>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>>>>>after time :-))
>>>>>
>>>>If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted
>>>>again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise
>>>>on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees,
>>>>woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens,
>>>>etc., etc., etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>No Malcolm.  It's quite the reverse.  If you look at the posting
>>>history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.
>>>
>>Of course I do. Your wild and unsubstantiated claims need challenging so
>>that people are not taken in by them.
>
>You really are rather dim, Malcolm.  And after all this time.
>
More childish name-calling trying to divert attention from being told 
the truth.

>>
>>>I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.
>>>
>>And as you can't cope with such challenges, having made those claims
>>without having the requisite facts or knowledge to back them up, you
>>inevitably resort to childish name-calling and vain attempts to
>>denigrate me, and anyone else who has the temerity to point out where
>>you are wrong.
>
>You really think that :-)
>
I know it.

>>
>>>But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
>>>ng so you have no effect on what I do.   You're flattering yourself
>>>again.
>>>
>>On the contrary. You spend an awful lot of time responding to me, asking
>>me questions about my qualifications, or my private life, or criticising
>>where I live.
>>
>
>Sure I do.
>
Yes, because you are desperate to denigrate me to try, vainly, to limit 
the damage I am doing to your campaigns.

How many grey squirrels or deer have you saved since you started?

-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:04:24 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:21:35 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
>>>>>>after time :-))
>>>>>>
>>>>>If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted
>>>>>again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise
>>>>>on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees,
>>>>>woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens,
>>>>>etc., etc., etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No Malcolm.  It's quite the reverse.  If you look at the posting
>>>>history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.
>>>>
>>>Of course I do. Your wild and unsubstantiated claims need challenging so
>>>that people are not taken in by them.
>>
>>You really are rather dim, Malcolm.  And after all this time.
>>
>More childish name-calling trying to divert attention from being told 
>the truth.
>

The truth is you're dim :-)

______________

Malcolm Ogilvie aka Dr Thick is confused about his measure of
intelligence.

A Macmillan:  "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"

Dr Thick:  "What a contorted question. The answer is yes. What about
yourself

______________

>>>
>>>>I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.
>>>>
>>>And as you can't cope with such challenges, having made those claims
>>>without having the requisite facts or knowledge to back them up, you
>>>inevitably resort to childish name-calling and vain attempts to
>>>denigrate me, and anyone else who has the temerity to point out where
>>>you are wrong.
>>
>>You really think that :-)
>>
>I know it.

Like you know everything else :-))

You just keep thinking that.

>
>>>
>>>>But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
>>>>ng so you have no effect on what I do.   You're flattering yourself
>>>>again.
>>>>
>>>On the contrary. You spend an awful lot of time responding to me, asking
>>>me questions about my qualifications, or my private life, or criticising
>>>where I live.
>>>
>>
>>Sure I do.
>>
>Yes, because you are desperate to denigrate me to try, vainly, to limit 
>the damage I am doing to your campaigns.
>
>How many grey squirrels or deer have you saved since you started?

I'm not in a position to "save" animals but I am in a position to
counter those who kill them and undermine their activities.

And according to the responses I get I'm reasonably successful at
that.

No problems from my side.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:04:24 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>>
>>How many grey squirrels or deer have you saved since you started?
>
>I'm not in a position to "save" animals but I am in a position to
>counter those who kill them and undermine their activities.
>
>And according to the responses I get I'm reasonably successful at
>that.
>
So, even though you claim to "undermine their activities", you haven't 
actually saved a single grey squirrel from being killed.

What a triumph!

-- 
Malcolm

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:44:24 +0000, amacmil304@aol.com wrote:

>Just for a laugh I thought I'd try a Google Alert on Malcolm Ogilvie's
>postings.
>
>Guess what?
>
>He's posting in other ngs on other subjects he seems to know little
>about with the same old trip he spews out here.
>
>Little wonder he's lost his credibility :-))
>
>One shot at Google Alert on him is enough to last me a lifetime :-))

He's a compulsive cyberstalker and cant help it. No wonder he is
looked upon with great pity these days!