On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:31:52 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:46:21 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:01:34 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have never used the term "Fake RSPB".
>>>>>
>>>>>So why say so?
>>>>
>>>>Where have I said it?
>>>>
>>>You're being obtuse, Angus.
>>
>>No I'm not.
>>
>>>
>>>Out of the blue, you wrote:
>>>
>>>"I have never used the term "Fake RSPB".
>>>
>>>If you've never used the term, why did you think you had to deny using
>>>it?
>>
>>
>>
>>Because the  RSPB is a reality.  They're conservation is fake.
>>
>"They're" ????
>
>Have you been on the bottle, Angus?

I meant "their" conservation is fake.

You might have worked that out.

 
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:01:14 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:31:52 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:46:21 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:01:34 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I have never used the term "Fake RSPB".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So why say so?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where have I said it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>You're being obtuse, Angus.
>>>>
>>>>No I'm not.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Out of the blue, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"I have never used the term "Fake RSPB".
>>>>>
>>>>>If you've never used the term, why did you think you had to deny using
>>>>>it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Because the  RSPB is a reality.  They're conservation is fake.
>>>>
>>>"They're" ????
>>>
>>>Have you been on the bottle, Angus?
>>
>>I meant "their" conservation is fake.
>>
>Ah, you "meant" something different from what you wrote.
>

No.  I made a mistake in the word.  

>How interesting.
>
>>You might have worked that out.
>>
>I did. You didn't.

Well it'd be a first for you :-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)