On Jan 17, 11:44 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:37:36 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >On Jan 17, 11:23 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:51:30 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
> >>  wrote:
> >> >On Jan 17, 6:47 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:

<snip>
> >> >There is no such ng that I can discover called alt.telephone.sex, but
> >> >you obviously know better - as always.
>
> >> You brought it up so I presume you know all about it.
>
> >Well, you presumed wrongly, didn't you? Just like you presume wrongly
> >about everything to do with natural history and conservation.
>
> So you made it up.

Nope. Just a senior moment during which the news group title I 'd
spotted in David L.'s "Profile" (aka Pete the Perve) was not correctly
stored in memory. Nice though, 'cos I was able to use this
recollection error to stuff one to you.

> Did you make up all your scientific nonsense as
> well?

You'll need to be more specific as there may be some old stuff that
has been superseded and therefore contains hypotheses no longer
supportable. That's how it works in science. There are no absolutes.
Doesn't mean it was made up, although it can look that way to 'hoi
polloi'

<snip>

> >If you wish to verify whether or not I am lying, search for the
> >profile of David L (aka too many names to list here) on "Google
> >Groups" Why do I think you won't bother doing that?
>
> Not particularly interested if it's more of your trolling.

So if I tell you it's not trolling, will you go and look it up? Or
does the real Pete scare you a tad? You really ought to read some of
stuff he/she/it has posted to a shed load of dodgy sounding ngs.
Specially the pseudonyms he used at the time.

<snip>
>
> >I would NEVER give an addy out over Usenet, neither would I do so
> >privately without asking the address owner first
>
> I don't mind giving out my address.  Do you yours?

Not at all. But there are people who clearly do - Pete the Perve for
one.

> >> >Nice of you to step up to the plate for poor old keyboard warrior Pete
> >> >when he found himself compromised through his own multiplicity of
> >> >personae. But he's going to fancy you even more after the above
> >> >posting, you know.
>
> >> You've a vivid imagination.
>
> >> Pity it didn't improve your science.
>
> >If this means you are offering criticism of my recent paper, I suggest
> >you write a reasoned rebuttal and send it to the editor. That's the
> >way it's done.
>
> What paper's that?

Do your own research. It's not difficult to find. I refuse to be a
self-publicist.

> Andrex?

Your obssesion with things excremental is becoming clearer.

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:21:02 -0800 (PST), "John M."
 wrote:

>On Jan 20, 5:15 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:00 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >On Jan 19, 12:51 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:45:51 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>>
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> >On Jan 18, 5:53 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:08:19 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>>
>> >> >>  wrote:
>> >> >> >On Jan 17, 11:44 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:37:36 -0800 (PST), "John M."
><snip>
>> >> You've just had another senior moment.
>>
>> >Really. I don't recall that :-))
>>
>> That's another one :-))
>
>Missed 'em both. Damn :-))
>
>> >> Do dementia sufferers have to pay for their treatment in France?
>>
>> >No.
>>
>> Even from the UK?
>
>Who's from the UK?

You?

>
>> >> Well, who's Pete.  You keep going on about this but never come up with
>> >> any answers.
>>
>> >Do your own research. Everybody else here has been told to - by you,
>> >no less.
>>
>> You obviously don't know :-))
>
>Just as we all know that *you* do. If that thought doesn't keep you
>awake at nights, it should :-(
>

Who's "we"?   And who's Pete?   

I've never had anything that kept me awake at nights.


><snip>
>> >> Forgot again!  Definitely dementia.  Will this bring you scurrying
>> >> back to the UK?
>>
>> >I expect you know the old Lancashire saying, " I mebbe daft, lad, but
>> >I airn't bludy stoopid." Just the response I need when the subject of
>> >return to the UK comes up.
>>
>> You might not have an option.  Who can tell the future?
>
>The French are not inclined to exile their own, if that's what you
>mean by this rather cryptic line. In the past they've had to call the
>Brits in to do it for them ;-)

History doesn't predict the future.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Jan 20, 8:38 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:21:02 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >On Jan 20, 5:15 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:00 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
> >>  wrote:
> >> >On Jan 19, 12:51 am, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:45:51 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >> >On Jan 18, 5:53 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:08:19 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
> >> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Jan 17, 11:44 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:37:36 -0800 (PST), "John M."
> ><snip>
> >> >> You've just had another senior moment.
>
> >> >Really. I don't recall that :-))
>
> >> That's another one :-))
>
> >Missed 'em both. Damn :-))
>
> >> >> Do dementia sufferers have to pay for their treatment in France?
>
> >> >No.
>
> >> Even from the UK?
>
> >Who's from the UK?
>
> You?

Once upon a time. Not any more.

> >> >> Well, who's Pete.  You keep going on about this but never come up with
> >> >> any answers.
>
> >> >Do your own research. Everybody else here has been told to - by you,
> >> >no less.
>
> >> You obviously don't know :-))
>
> >Just as we all know that *you* do. If that thought doesn't keep you
> >awake at nights, it should :-(
>
> Who's "we"?   And who's Pete?

"We" are the members of this ng.
Pete is the one who's keen on getting into your bed and keeping you
awake at nights - if his tacky, May 2004, posts from Dal@yahoo.com are
any guide :-(

> I've never had anything that kept me awake at nights.

You must have been a wow on honeymoon. Perhaps you could get your wife
to pen a few remeniscences for us on uk.e.c  Could prove to be more
soporific than Chamomile tea.

> ><snip>
> >> >> Forgot again!  Definitely dementia.  Will this bring you scurrying
> >> >> back to the UK?
>
> >> >I expect you know the old Lancashire saying, " I mebbe daft, lad, but
> >> >I airn't bludy stoopid." Just the response I need when the subject of
> >> >return to the UK comes up.
>
> >> You might not have an option.  Who can tell the future?
>
> >The French are not inclined to exile their own, if that's what you
> >mean by this rather cryptic line. In the past they've had to call the
> >Brits in to do it for them ;-)
>
> History doesn't predict the future.

You have to be fairly nasty - or a potentially-successful, opposition
politician - for your own country to exile you.

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:31:09 -0800 (PST), "John M."
 wrote:

>Subscribers might find it interesting to see Pete's posting history
>using another of his pseudonyms.
>
>Go to:http://groups.google.com/ find one of the posts by David L
>earlier in this thread, click on "View profile" next to the name at
>the top of the post.
>
>Best hurry before he cancels them all, like he did for many other
>pseudonyms he has used over the years.


Who's Pete?


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:56:34 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
 wrote:

>In article ,
>    wrote:
>
>> >
>> >> They take you for a fool Robert and you don't see it :-)
>> >I take you for a miserable old stirrer Angus.
>
>
>> Well, I certainly wouldn't work for a wildlife trust that kills
>> wildlife and allow bloodsports on its land.
>
>I think we all know that.

Trouble is the public are not fully aware what goes on.  They donate
to WTs because they thing wildlife is being protected - not
discriminated against.

>
>> If that makes me a "miserable old stirrer", I'd rather be that than an
>> old fool who does.
>
>Yawn.

Have a sleep :-))

Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)