I see Malcolm Ogilvie has dropped out of sight on the issue of the
RSPB allowing the shooting of birds on their reserves.

He has been lying on this ng for years about their involvement with
blood sports.  Now it's out in the open.

If members care about birds they should vote with their feet and
starve this dreadful organisation of its funds.



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:45:57 +0000, amacmil304@aol.com wrote:

>
>I see Malcolm Ogilvie has dropped out of sight on the issue of the
>RSPB allowing the shooting of birds on their reserves.
>
>He has been lying on this ng for years about their involvement with
>blood sports.  Now it's out in the open.
>
>If members care about birds they should vote with their feet and
>starve this dreadful organisation of its funds.

A little birdy told me that Ogilvie is not so far isolated from the
RSPB as he would like us to believe. He's a plant and it was done to
avoid conspiracy charges as with David Bradbury and The Woodland Trust
who still posts here using sock puppets, having never quite got over
being caught. He is JM and others.

In message , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>
>I see Malcolm Ogilvie has dropped out of sight on the issue of the
>RSPB allowing the shooting of birds on their reserves.

Oh dear Oh dear Angus is upset that his multiplicity of threads hasn't 
got a reply from Malcolm.  How sad.

I don't suppose it has dawned on him Malcolm has a life and might well 
be away from home.

>
>He has been lying on this ng for years about their involvement with
>blood sports.  Now it's out in the open.

NO he hasn't if casual readers check back over the many red herring 
threads Angus has started you will find he has never denied that there 
is shooting on RSPB reserves and the reasons for it have been fully 
discussed.

The above is part of the selective memory Angus is blessed with.

>
>If members care about birds they should vote with their feet and
>starve this dreadful organisation of its funds.
>
Ah here is the fake Angus.   He prefers that the difficult to police 
reserves are left without the supervision of responsible shooters with a 
bag limit. This would result in a free for all for any person with a 
shot gun to take as many as they like.

Strange he should be in favour of more suffering just to further his 
vendetta against conservation organisations.

Casual readers please note this fact carefully.  It clearly illustrates 
the attitude that Angus holds.

The concern for the birds is actually fake.
-- 
Malcolm Kane

In article <$9Wjm9B7FQjHFwaP@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane 
 writes
>In message , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>
>>I see Malcolm Ogilvie has dropped out of sight on the issue of the
>>RSPB allowing the shooting of birds on their reserves.
>
>Oh dear Oh dear Angus is upset that his multiplicity of threads hasn't 
>got a reply from Malcolm.  How sad.
>
>I don't suppose it has dawned on him Malcolm has a life and might well 
>be away from home.
>
Absolutely correct. I've been away. I'm touched that Angus has missed 
me!

>>
>>He has been lying on this ng for years about their involvement with
>>blood sports.  Now it's out in the open.
>
>NO he hasn't if casual readers check back over the many red herring 
>threads Angus has started you will find he has never denied that there 
>is shooting on RSPB reserves and the reasons for it have been fully 
>discussed.
>
Of course they have. And proof of that is Angus's regurgitating of old 
messages about it.

>The above is part of the selective memory Angus is blessed with.
>
I prefer to call it lying.

>>
>>If members care about birds they should vote with their feet and
>>starve this dreadful organisation of its funds.
>>
>Ah here is the fake Angus.   He prefers that the difficult to police 
>reserves are left without the supervision of responsible shooters with 
>a bag limit. This would result in a free for all for any person with a 
>shot gun to take as many as they like.
>
>Strange he should be in favour of more suffering just to further his 
>vendetta against conservation organisations.
>
>Casual readers please note this fact carefully.  It clearly illustrates 
>the attitude that Angus holds.
>
>The concern for the birds is actually fake.

Yes, I think it ought to be written "CONcern".


-- 
Malcolm

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:10:24 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article <$9Wjm9B7FQjHFwaP@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane 
> writes
>>In message , 
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>
>>>I see Malcolm Ogilvie has dropped out of sight on the issue of the
>>>RSPB allowing the shooting of birds on their reserves.
>>
>>Oh dear Oh dear Angus is upset that his multiplicity of threads hasn't 
>>got a reply from Malcolm.  How sad.
>>
>>I don't suppose it has dawned on him Malcolm has a life and might well 
>>be away from home.
>>
>Absolutely correct. I've been away. 

We noticed. You left in such a hurry to see your RSPB masters the
kettle was still on! Our ears were burning, what was the result of the
meeting? Have you decided amongst yourselves that it's probably best
to come clean before the RSPB get more dirt kicked in their faces?