In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:57:26 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:10:01 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane
>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public".
>>>>>>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is
>>>>>>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because
>>>>>>>I am the great Angus."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of
>>>>>>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't
>>>>>>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Bored, Malcolm?
>>>>>
>>>>No, hugely amused :-)
>>>
>>>So am I.  Looks like you regard me as an expert in something :-))
>>>
>>Yes, Angus, in bullshitting the public.
>>
>
>Not me, Malcolm.  I don't claim to be an expert in anything.
>
What you *claim* is immaterial, Angus. The fact remains that you are an 
expert in bullshitting the public.

Wear the accolade with pride!

>>>>
>>>>>Talking to your sock puppet?
>>>>>
>>>>I don't have one.
>>>
>>>Of course you do. The drivelling Penrith jeweller.
>>>
>>I don't know any jewellers in Penrith.
>
>Really?  And you so close :-)
>
A silly remark.

>>
>>I note your use of an abusive term and, naturally, accept your surrender
>>from the argument.
>>
>
>You'd think by now that you'd know I don't surrender.
>
Of course you would claim that, but it isn't true, like so many of your 
claims.

>You're a slow learner, Malcolm.  How long did you take to get your
>PhD?  Was it 10 years?
>
No.

>>>>
>>>>>Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))
>>>>>
>>>>I can't do anything like that to something I don't have.
>>>
>>>Of course you can.  And if you squeeze in the right place you never
>>>know what precious stones might pop out :-))
>>>
>>  More silly remarks.
>>
>
>Quite funny, I thought.
>
Your thoughts on the matter are of no consequence.
>
>>>
>>>>I see you are
>>>>still living in fantasy land, inventing things about people who
>>>>constantly get the better of you by showing up your lack of
>>>>understanding on conservation, woodlands, woodland management, ecology,
>>>>deer, squirrels, indeed anything you try and pontificate about :-)
>>>
>>>No Malcolm, just showing up the fakes for what they're worth.
>>>
>>Thank you for confirming that you are living in fantasy land as that's
>>the only place that your "fakes" exist.
>>
>
>It's your world they live in.
>
The only "fakes" are in your fantasy land, Angus.

>
>>>My pleasure :-))
>>>
>>I couldn't care less if you find it pleasurable to keep living in
>>fantasy land.
>
>No fantasy in my land but plenty of fakes in yours.
>
Just not true, like so much you say :-(

-- 
Malcolm