On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:00:12 -0800, Rudy Canoza
 wrote:

>pearl wrote:
>> Be so kind as to tell me how to cahange 
>
><snicker>
>
>
>> the follow-ups,
>> moody, so that every time I can change it to alt.troll.
>
>Fuck off, you HIV-spreading .

I agree Jonny, she's splattered you all over the place. You don't like
women do you Jonny!









--

My greatest speech to the peasants
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em7LWuP0T7Q

pam the SPAMMERS send an email to enquires@urfreesim.co.uk



England / Angelic Upstarts 

The red in the flag is the blood that was spilt
In the way that your forefathers tell
And never a country has been so great
The stories Britannia could tell 

I never want to live my life
Away from the golden shores
There's never a country in the world
With the scent of an English rose 

England oh England a country so great
A land that's so fair and so true
There'll never be any colours like
The red the white and the blue 

Whenever you go to a far off land
There's something goes with you
The pride and the joy and the love that comes
For your mother of red white and blue 

You could never be born under a flag that's like
The one of the Union Jack
St.Georges spirit has never died
It all keeps coming back

Adenoid Hynkel . wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:00:12 -0800, Rudy Canoza
>  wrote:
> 
>> pearl wrote:
>>> Be so kind as to tell me how to cahange 
>> <snicker>
>>
>>
>>> the follow-ups,
>>> moody, so that every time I can change it to alt.troll.
>> Fuck off, you HIV-spreading slut.
> 
> I agree Rudy

Good.  You can fuck off now, poof.

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane 
> writes
>>>
>>>
>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public". 
>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is 
>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because 
>>I am the great Angus."
>>
>
>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of 
>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't 
>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)

Bored, Malcolm?

Talking to your sock puppet?

Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:10:01 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane
>>> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public".
>>>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is
>>>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because
>>>>I am the great Angus."
>>>>
>>>
>>>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of
>>>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't
>>>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)
>>
>>Bored, Malcolm?
>>
>No, hugely amused :-)

So am I.  Looks like you regard me as an expert in something :-))

>
>>Talking to your sock puppet?
>>
>I don't have one.

Of course you do. The drivelling Penrith jeweller.

>
>>Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))
>>
>I can't do anything like that to something I don't have. 

Of course you can.  And if you squeeze in the right place you never
know what precious stones might pop out :-))


>I see you are 
>still living in fantasy land, inventing things about people who 
>constantly get the better of you by showing up your lack of 
>understanding on conservation, woodlands, woodland management, ecology, 
>deer, squirrels, indeed anything you try and pontificate about :-)

No Malcolm, just showing up the fakes for what they're worth.

My pleasure :-))






Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:57:26 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:10:01 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane
>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public".
>>>>>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is
>>>>>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because
>>>>>>I am the great Angus."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of
>>>>>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't
>>>>>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)
>>>>
>>>>Bored, Malcolm?
>>>>
>>>No, hugely amused :-)
>>
>>So am I.  Looks like you regard me as an expert in something :-))
>>
>Yes, Angus, in bullshitting the public.
>

Not me, Malcolm.  I don't claim to be an expert in anything.

>>>
>>>>Talking to your sock puppet?
>>>>
>>>I don't have one.
>>
>>Of course you do. The drivelling Penrith jeweller.
>>
>I don't know any jewellers in Penrith.

Really?  And you so close :-)

>
>I note your use of an abusive term and, naturally, accept your surrender 
>from the argument.
>

You'd think by now that you'd know I don't surrender.

You're a slow learner, Malcolm.  How long did you take to get your
PhD?  Was it 10 years?

>>>
>>>>Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))
>>>>
>>>I can't do anything like that to something I don't have.
>>
>>Of course you can.  And if you squeeze in the right place you never
>>know what precious stones might pop out :-))
>>
>  More silly remarks.
>

Quite funny, I thought.  


>>
>>>I see you are
>>>still living in fantasy land, inventing things about people who
>>>constantly get the better of you by showing up your lack of
>>>understanding on conservation, woodlands, woodland management, ecology,
>>>deer, squirrels, indeed anything you try and pontificate about :-)
>>
>>No Malcolm, just showing up the fakes for what they're worth.
>>
>Thank you for confirming that you are living in fantasy land as that's 
>the only place that your "fakes" exist.
>

It's your world they live in.


>>My pleasure :-))
>>
>I couldn't care less if you find it pleasurable to keep living in 
>fantasy land.

No fantasy in my land but plenty of fakes in yours.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:47:27 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:57:26 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:10:01 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane
>>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public".
>>>>>>>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is
>>>>>>>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because
>>>>>>>>I am the great Angus."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of
>>>>>>>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't
>>>>>>>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bored, Malcolm?
>>>>>>
>>>>>No, hugely amused :-)
>>>>
>>>>So am I.  Looks like you regard me as an expert in something :-))
>>>>
>>>Yes, Angus, in bullshitting the public.
>>>
>>
>>Not me, Malcolm.  I don't claim to be an expert in anything.
>>
>What you *claim* is immaterial, Angus. The fact remains that you are an 
>expert in bullshitting the public.

Not me.  All I do is expose and oppose the fakes.

>
>Wear the accolade with pride!
>

You're the one that knows all about pride and conceit.

>>>>>
>>>>>>Talking to your sock puppet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>I don't have one.
>>>>
>>>>Of course you do. The drivelling Penrith jeweller.
>>>>
>>>I don't know any jewellers in Penrith.
>>
>>Really?  And you so close :-)
>>
>A silly remark.
>

I would reckon a hand in a sock-puppet is pretty close:-))


>>>
>>>I note your use of an abusive term and, naturally, accept your surrender
>>>from the argument.
>>>
>>
>>You'd think by now that you'd know I don't surrender.
>>
>Of course you would claim that, but it isn't true, like so many of your 
>claims.
>

So you say :-)


>>You're a slow learner, Malcolm.  How long did you take to get your
>>PhD?  Was it 10 years?
>>
>No.
>

How long then, Malcolm from your first degree?

>>>>>
>>>>>>Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))
>>>>>>
>>>>>I can't do anything like that to something I don't have.
>>>>
>>>>Of course you can.  And if you squeeze in the right place you never
>>>>know what precious stones might pop out :-))
>>>>
>>>  More silly remarks.
>>>
>>
>>Quite funny, I thought.
>>
>Your thoughts on the matter are of no consequence.

According to the number of fake conservationists that pounce on me
perhaps you're wrong.


>>
>>>>
>>>>>I see you are
>>>>>still living in fantasy land, inventing things about people who
>>>>>constantly get the better of you by showing up your lack of
>>>>>understanding on conservation, woodlands, woodland management, ecology,
>>>>>deer, squirrels, indeed anything you try and pontificate about :-)
>>>>
>>>>No Malcolm, just showing up the fakes for what they're worth.
>>>>
>>>Thank you for confirming that you are living in fantasy land as that's
>>>the only place that your "fakes" exist.
>>>
>>
>>It's your world they live in.
>>
>The only "fakes" are in your fantasy land, Angus.
>

Regrettably, I don't have a fantasy land.   

>>
>>>>My pleasure :-))
>>>>
>>>I couldn't care less if you find it pleasurable to keep living in
>>>fantasy land.
>>
>>No fantasy in my land but plenty of fakes in yours.
>>
>Just not true, like so much you say :-(

You always say that but you can't combat my arguments effectively.

Why is that?

Let's talk about management and fences:-))



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:20:20 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:47:27 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:57:26 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:10:01 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:54:50 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In article <DHbM4+BD5qgHFwmL@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm Kane
>>>>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>This is yet again an example of the attitude Angus has to the "public".
>>>>>>>>>>Basically it appears to be "you are so thick that all I have to do is
>>>>>>>>>>put any old bullshit in front of you and demand you believe it because
>>>>>>>>>>I am the great Angus."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>While at the same time he accuses conservation organisations of
>>>>>>>>>bullshitting the public. Even if they were minded to, they couldn't
>>>>>>>>>compete with his mastery of the technique :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Bored, Malcolm?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, hugely amused :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So am I.  Looks like you regard me as an expert in something :-))
>>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, Angus, in bullshitting the public.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not me, Malcolm.  I don't claim to be an expert in anything.
>>>>
>>>What you *claim* is immaterial, Angus. The fact remains that you are an
>>>expert in bullshitting the public.
>>
>>Not me.  All I do is expose and oppose the fakes.
>>
>
>So you claim. But as "fakes" don't exist, there's nothing to expose or 
>oppose.
>

Fakes are so-called conservation organisations that indulge in
environmentally damaging activities and encourage them in others to
fund their existence.

Nothing complicated about it.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Talking to your sock puppet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't have one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Of course you do. The drivelling Penrith jeweller.
>>>>>>
>>>>>I don't know any jewellers in Penrith.
>>>>
>>>>Really?  And you so close :-)
>>>>
>>>A silly remark.
>>>
>>
>>I would reckon a hand in a sock-puppet is pretty close:-))
>>
>It's not just "pretty close" to being a silly remark, it *is* a silly 
>remark.
>

I think it's very apt.


>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I note your use of an abusive term and, naturally, accept your surrender
>>>>>from the argument.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You'd think by now that you'd know I don't surrender.
>>>>
>>>Of course you would claim that, but it isn't true, like so many of your
>>>claims.
>>>
>>
>>So you say :-)
>>
>Absolutely.

So you say :-)


>>
>>>>You're a slow learner, Malcolm.  How long did you take to get your
>>>>PhD?  Was it 10 years?
>>>>
>>>No.
>>>
>>
>>How long then, Malcolm from your first degree?
>>

No comment?  Was it more than ten years?

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Try squeezing it a bit harder and it might talk some sense:-))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I can't do anything like that to something I don't have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Of course you can.  And if you squeeze in the right place you never
>>>>>>know what precious stones might pop out :-))
>>>>>>
>>>>>  More silly remarks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Quite funny, I thought.
>>>>
>>>Your thoughts on the matter are of no consequence.
>>
>>According to the number of fake conservationists that pounce on me
>>perhaps you're wrong.
>>
>
>What "number"?
>

A few here and those in the Scotsman comments to protect the sacred
cow of their brand of "conservation".



>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see you are
>>>>>>>still living in fantasy land, inventing things about people who
>>>>>>>constantly get the better of you by showing up your lack of
>>>>>>>understanding on conservation, woodlands, woodland management, ecology,
>>>>>>>deer, squirrels, indeed anything you try and pontificate about :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No Malcolm, just showing up the fakes for what they're worth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Thank you for confirming that you are living in fantasy land as that's
>>>>>the only place that your "fakes" exist.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's your world they live in.
>>>>
>>>The only "fakes" are in your fantasy land, Angus.
>>>
>>
>>Regrettably, I don't have a fantasy land.
>>
>Well, as you're living in it, you wouldn't recognise it as one, would 
>you?
>

Of course I would.


>>>>
>>>>>>My pleasure :-))
>>>>>>
>>>>>I couldn't care less if you find it pleasurable to keep living in
>>>>>fantasy land.
>>>>
>>>>No fantasy in my land but plenty of fakes in yours.
>>>>
>>>Just not true, like so much you say :-(
>>
>>You always say that but you can't combat my arguments effectively.
>>
>I do it all the time.
>
>You start a thread with some ill-researched statement which can be 
>readily challenged. But you never seem to have the required knowledge to 
>respond to serious questions about what you've claimed, but instead try 
>dodging the question, answering with another question, requesting the 
>evidence from the person who has asked you for yours and then, 
>inevitably, when you realise you can't continue to support your claim, 
>you descend to childish abuse and name-calling.
>

I don't think I can remember when I made a claim that you couldn't
challenge effectively without the customary nonsense of "you don't
understand" and "ignorant" etc.  But when it comes down to it you
can't challenge it at all.  Your recent rubbish about fencing was an
instance.

>>Why is that?
>>
>>Let's talk about management and fences:-))
>>
>Indeed, let's do that.
>
>Does the woodland you own have a fence round it? And what is the 
>adjoining land use?

I have told you umpteen times I am not discussing my woodland on an
individual basis.  

What I have asked you it about a cottage garden fence - or it could be
any fence round a woodland - managing or controlling land outside its
perimeter.


But you can't answer it.


Also you have a mental block about so-called conservationists damaging
the natural environment to fund their existence.  Junk mail from the
Woodland Trust is one.

What's wrong with you , Malcolm?  Do these people pay you to uphold
fake values?


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)