Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:58:06 +0000,    group: uk.environment.conservation        back       
Re: How to fake an "ancient woodland"   
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:06:04 +0000, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:57:00 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:03:16 +0000, Malcolm
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>snip over-use of your obsessive words "fake" and "nazi"
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But they are based on the evidence that so-called ancient woodlands
>>>>>>are being promoted with no ancient trees.
>>>>>>
>>>>>The first response to your letter in The Scotsman this morning sums you
>>>>>up very well:
>>>>>
>>>>>"What thought process is in operation that has considered this letter
>>>>>worthy of publication ?
>>>>>
>>>>>If Mr MacMillan really does not understand that the process of restoring
>>>>>natural woodland, (through the reintroduction and replanting of native
>>>>>species within those ancient woodlands that have been allowed to
>>>>>degenerated in recent times,) is exactly what it claims to be, surely it
>>>>>ill behoves him to expose his lack of understanding of plain English in
>>>>>such a public forum."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>:-))
>>>>
>>>Just as we keep telling you :-))
>>>
>>>I see you couldn't think of anything new to say in your response to that
>>>regular commentator on your letters, Slioch!
>>
>>
>>I don't need to say anything "new".
>>
>>I am consistent in what I say.
>>
>Hmm, the flaw there is that what you said has been rubbished, not just 
>by me but by responses on The Scotsman website. Therefore, if you can 
>say anything new you must be accepting that you have exposed your lack 
>of understanding of plain English :-)


Not in the slightest.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident. 
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:58:06 +0000   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us