In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:39:02 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:48:40 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes

>>>>>
>>>>>It's hardly research.  But I suppose it is to the grant screwing
>>>>>community you're part of.
>>>>>
>>>>LOL!
>>>>
>>>>You really do have a warped view of the world, don't you?
>>>
>>>No, a realistic view of fakes on the make.
>>>
>>I prefer my interpretation :-)
>
>That doesn't surprise me.:-)
>
Of course it doesn't, because you know it's the correct one :-)


>>>>>
>>>>>Because you're reluctant to disclose it freely.
>>>>>
>>>>Not at all.
>>>
>>>We,, why not disclose it?
>>>
>>Because you said it didn't matter to you. When it does matter, you can
>>look it up for yourself.
>>
>
>I might do that sometime when I've nothing better to do.
>
So, that'll be any time now, or any time in the future :-)

>>>> You've said it doesn't matter to you, so why should I be
>>>>bothered to tell you?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Could it be you're ashamed?
>>>
>>LOL!  You really do love inventing things, don't you?
>>
>>
>
>I just wonder if it was something pretty mediocre.  It didn't get you
>very far.
>
More silly nonsense.

>>>>>
>>>>>Dr Afterthought; that's you :-))
>>>>>
>>>>No, I had thought it out beforehand :-)
>>>
>>>That would be a first.
>>>
>>>Not much original thought comes from you.
>>>
>>LOL!  All you can do is invent nonsense.
>
>
>What original thought has come from you?
>
>Come on, Malcolm.  Don't be shy.
>
Read my thesis :-)

-- 
Malcolm