In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:48:40 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:16:47 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:09:30 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:26:11 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It would seem there's something he wants to hide.  You'd think he'd be
>>>>>>>>>proud to tell us about it.  I have asked him many times about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not afraid to tell anyone about my O Grade maths.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thank you for saying that, Angus, because I think you will agree that
>>>>>>>>you have never been asked to produce any evidence that you have an O
>>>>>>>>Grade maths. Your word that you have one has always been accepted. Not
>>>>>>>>that the evidence that you have your 'O' grade is available on the
>>>>>>>>Internet,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But I do tell you what my O Grade was for.  You don't tell us what
>>>>>>>your PhD was for.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Duh!  It was for completing a piece of research and writing a thesis
>>>>>>about it like all PhDs. If you want to know the title, look it up. It's
>>>>>>just a few clicks away.
>>>>>
>>>>>More avoidance.
>>>>>
>>>>Just saying "Do your own research". And you don't have to look very far
>>>>to see where I got that phrase from.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>It's hardly research.  But I suppose it is to the grant screwing
>>>community you're part of.
>>>
>>LOL!
>>
>>You really do have a warped view of the world, don't you?
>
>No, a realistic view of fakes on the make.
>
I prefer my interpretation :-)

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> whereas the evidence that I have a PhD is most definitely
>>>>>>>>there, which *anyone* can find with a handful of clicks via Google.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So why won't you tell us?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because I like saying to you: "Do your own research" :-))
>>>>>
>>>>>It doesn't matter to me enough.
>>>>>
>>>>Then why keep asking?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because you're reluctant to disclose it freely.
>>>
>>Not at all.
>
>We,, why not disclose it?
>
Because you said it didn't matter to you. When it does matter, you can 
look it up for yourself.

>> You've said it doesn't matter to you, so why should I be
>>bothered to tell you?
>>
>
>Could it be you're ashamed?
>
LOL!  You really do love inventing things, don't you?


>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Perhaps you would like to consider whether you are applying double
>>>>>>>>standards next time you are minded to query my qualification.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Not at all.  I have said mine was for maths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No double standards there from me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Absolutely double standards because you take it for granted that people
>>>>>>accept that you actually have an O grade, yet keep querying my PhD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I've told you the  O Grade was for maths whether you accept it or not
>>>>>doesn't concern me.  But you won't say what your thesis was for.  Are
>>>>>you ashamed of the subject material?
>>>>>
>>>>You've just said "It doesn't matter to me enough", so why are you
>>>>keeping on asking?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because you're reluctant to disclose it freely.
>>>
>>No, I'm not. But as you've said it doesn't matter to you, there's no
>>point in doing so, is there?
>>
>>
>See above.
>
Above is where where you said it didn't matter to you.


>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Do they give out doctorates for tiddly winks :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Probably :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Though it might be wrapped up in some title such as "Biomechanical
>>>>>>>>forces exerted when impacting flattened circular objects".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How about giving us the formula for that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>:-))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, if you will fund me for three years, I'll work one out :-))
>>>>>
>>>>>I could well imagine it would take a grant sucking PhD to stretch it
>>>>>out to that time.
>>>>>
>>>>I thought I would give you a suitable feed line :-)
>>>
>>>Dr Afterthought; that's you :-))
>>>
>>No, I had thought it out beforehand :-)
>
>That would be a first.
>
>Not much original thought comes from you.
>
LOL!  All you can do is invent nonsense.

-- 
Malcolm