In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:16:47 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:09:30 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:26:11 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It would seem there's something he wants to hide.  You'd think he'd be
>>>>>>>proud to tell us about it.  I have asked him many times about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm not afraid to tell anyone about my O Grade maths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank you for saying that, Angus, because I think you will agree that
>>>>>>you have never been asked to produce any evidence that you have an O
>>>>>>Grade maths. Your word that you have one has always been accepted. Not
>>>>>>that the evidence that you have your 'O' grade is available on the
>>>>>>Internet,
>>>>>
>>>>>But I do tell you what my O Grade was for.  You don't tell us what
>>>>>your PhD was for.
>>>>>
>>>>Duh!  It was for completing a piece of research and writing a thesis
>>>>about it like all PhDs. If you want to know the title, look it up. It's
>>>>just a few clicks away.
>>>
>>>More avoidance.
>>>
>>Just saying "Do your own research". And you don't have to look very far
>>to see where I got that phrase from.
>>
>>
>
>It's hardly research.  But I suppose it is to the grant screwing
>community you're part of.
>
LOL!

You really do have a warped view of the world, don't you?

>>>>
>>>>>> whereas the evidence that I have a PhD is most definitely
>>>>>>there, which *anyone* can find with a handful of clicks via Google.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So why won't you tell us?
>>>>>
>>>>Because I like saying to you: "Do your own research" :-))
>>>
>>>It doesn't matter to me enough.
>>>
>>Then why keep asking?
>>
>
>Because you're reluctant to disclose it freely.
>
Not at all. You've said it doesn't matter to you, so why should I be 
bothered to tell you?

>
>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps you would like to consider whether you are applying double
>>>>>>standards next time you are minded to query my qualification.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Not at all.  I have said mine was for maths.
>>>>>
>>>>>No double standards there from me.
>>>>>
>>>>Absolutely double standards because you take it for granted that people
>>>>accept that you actually have an O grade, yet keep querying my PhD.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I've told you the  O Grade was for maths whether you accept it or not
>>>doesn't concern me.  But you won't say what your thesis was for.  Are
>>>you ashamed of the subject material?
>>>
>>You've just said "It doesn't matter to me enough", so why are you
>>keeping on asking?
>>
>
>Because you're reluctant to disclose it freely.
>
No, I'm not. But as you've said it doesn't matter to you, there's no 
point in doing so, is there?


>
>>>
>>>>>>>Do they give out doctorates for tiddly winks :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Probably :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Though it might be wrapped up in some title such as "Biomechanical
>>>>>>forces exerted when impacting flattened circular objects".
>>>>>
>>>>>How about giving us the formula for that?
>>>>>
>>>>>:-))
>>>>>
>>>>Well, if you will fund me for three years, I'll work one out :-))
>>>
>>>I could well imagine it would take a grant sucking PhD to stretch it
>>>out to that time.
>>>
>>I thought I would give you a suitable feed line :-)
>
>Dr Afterthought; that's you :-))
>
No, I had thought it out beforehand :-)

-- 
Malcolm