In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>
>Have you noticed he pumps out his self righteous rubbish on a variety
>of subjects in other newsgroups as well.  Currently he's on
>uk.environment.conservation, demon.service, scot.politics,  and
>uk.business.agriculture

Naturally, after you have indulged in some stalking of me (!), you were 
100% bound to get something wrong. You have.

> If someone
>disagrees with him, they're "ignorant" or something similar.
>
I'm flattered that you are following me about, Angus. Still worried 
about me, obviously, and the influence I wield. And the fact that I am a 
conservationist and proud of it. All your silly jibes about fakes and 
CONs have got you nowhere. How many deer have you saved from being 
culled in 2007? Or ruddy ducks? Or grey squirrels? And I don't include 
calling yourself one, of course. LOL!!

>I think he's a sad old guy that's never really achieved anything of
>scientific merit and this is burning him up inside.

Your wishful thinking about me just gets more and more fanciful :-))

>I've met these
>types before - they continually have to try to impress people with
>their "knowledge" to make them feel important.

ROFL!!! You've lost, Angus - again :-))

>  Morgan's another one.
>
>Quite sad really.
>

Whereas you don't bother with any knowledge, but spout out claim after 
claim which you can't substantiate and are then reduced to asking the 
person who has challenged you to produce the evidence instead.

Now that *is* sad, as well as a sign of how desperate you are :-))

-- 
Malcolm