Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 19 May 2008 00:58:02 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.environment        back       
Questions that Roger Coppock will never answer   
Does air containing 400 ppm CO2 warm faster than air containing 200
ppm
when they are both irradiated with IR under the same conditions?

Why does methane show lesser warming than air in a greenhouse gas
warming experiment designed to contain it ?

Why does CO2  warm at the same rate as air when a greenhouse gas
warming experiment is insulated (as it should be to be a valid
experiment ) ?

 Why does CO2 lag behind the temperature in Ice Core data ?
Why doesn't the slope of the temperature curve increase as the CO2
increases and why does the slope of th CO2 graph increase as the
temperature increases ?

Why does he  insist on treating the various factors that affect Global
temperatures separately when the proper scientific method would
be to treat them together ?

Why does he insist that CO2 is driving the temperature up when
reasonable statistical analysis indicates the temperature rise
is causing the CO2 to increase ?

Is it because he not a scientist but a left wing political hack
who will lie to further the demise of capitalism ?

Roger won't reply he will hide behind his sock puppets.
date: Mon, 19 May 2008 00:58:02 -0700 (PDT)   author:   chemist

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us