Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 06:34:28 -0400,    group: uk.environment        back       
Aviation Conspiracy: Is Sen. Spector Calling For Flight Limits?   
The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter480.htm

Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#480........................................................................May 
11,  2008 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm  If you want to get the 
newsletter sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy 
rockaway@prodigy.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote of the Week:  "It's throwing a wrench into the works" comment in a 
news story this week about new Airspace Redesign flight pattern at Newark 
Airport that has confused pilots and has "led to several incidents in which 
planes turned in the wrong direction."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Sen. Spector Calling For Flight Limits?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bill Sees It (Editorial): Is Senator Spector Playing Games With Aviation 
Pollution? Is Arlen Spector (R-Penn.) finally listening to the cries of 
their constituents and demanding that there be some controls on the 
increasing numbers of plane "operations" that occur at major airports in the 
United States? I thought so at first when I first read the story about him 
introducing amendments to the FAA Reauthorization Bill. But looking at the 
story more closely I see its more political double talk. Spector is saying 
its OK for the FAA to use the new Airspace Redesign routes "when the airport 
is most congested." Spector, like his buddy Chuck Schumer, can't seem to 
break away from promoting the health damaging, air polluting aviation 
industry.

 The Tale Of Two Hudsons And Their Opinion On Aircraft Noise!!!  It is 
almost amusing to see the different attitudes on aviation expansion of 
politicians representing communities located on New York's  Hudson River. 
While one area's politicians are desperately fighting  the FAA's Airspace 
Redesign scheme, which will bring  Newark Airport flight paths and noise 
over their heads, another community's politicians are PUSHING for the 
creation of a forth major N.Y.  City airport (Stewart Airport) in their 
backyard!!! Airport expansion Senator "Chuck" Schumer is one of the main 
characters not only behind the Airspace Redesign scheme but also the 
expansion of Stewart Airport. This week he announced that  2.7 million 
dollars has been allocated for rail link to Stewart Airport. Of course no 
environmental impact study will be done on the increased passengers and air 
cargo that will increase when this rail link is built. There wasn't one when 
the New York and New Jersey Port Authority took over possession of the 
airport and announced it planned for a major expansion. While Schumer is 
wheeling and dealing in the effort to expand Stewart Airport, he has not 
responded to the people in lower Hudson Valley area whose health and quality 
of life will be impacted by the change in Newark Airport routes.




---------------------------------------------------------------------

Spector's FAA Bill Amendments Putting Lipstick On A Pig? May 5, 2008 -- U.S. 
Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) filed two amendments to the Federal Aviation 
Administration Reauthorization Act which is currently being considered by 
the Senate. The amendments seek to reduce overflights over Delaware County 
and delays caused by flight over-scheduling at Philadelphia International 
Airport. Senator Specter investigated both of these issues at a field 
hearing he convened in Philadelphia on Friday, April 25th. During the field 
hearing, Senator Specter questioned FAA's Acting Administrator Robert 
Sturgell on airspace redesign and flight scheduling practices at 
Philadelphia International Airport. Sturgell acknowledged that planes are 
sometimes directed to fly a route over residential suburbs in Delaware 
County as a primary option - not as a congestion-relief option as the FAA 
earlier indicated would be the case. "The FAA has been unwilling to honor 
its commitment by limiting use of the headings to only those times when 10 
or more aircraft are waiting because they claim that doing so would require 
them to conduct a reevaluation and analysis," said Senator Specter. "This 
amendment will ensure that communities are not frivolously disrupted by 
overflights but still give air traffic controllers the option of using 
dispersal headings as a relief option when the airport is most congested." 
http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48746953_senator-specter-introduces-amendments-faa-bill-red 
Media Buys The Con Job!!! U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter is proposing an amendment 
that could cut down on the number of low-flying planes over Philidelphia 
International Airport sends over the Delaware County suburbs. The republican 
senator filed an amendment Monday to the Federal Aviation Administration's 
funding bill. The amendment would allow use of the Delaware County departure 
headings only to reduce airport congestion. Specter questioned an FAA 
official about the takeoff routes in a hearing last month in Philadelphia. 
The official acknowledged planes can sometimes sent over residential suburbs 
even when it is not necessary to relieve congestion. 
http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NEWS01/80506014/1006

New York County Legislators Push To Stop Increased Aviation Health 
Impacts!!! County Legislators Alden Wolfe, Connie Coker, Chair Harriet 
Cornell and others timely rendered an April 30 Environmental Committee 
resolution seeking removal of funding provisions for the New York/New 
Jersey/Philadelphia Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign from the Federal 
Aviation Administration reauthorization bill pending before the U.S. Senate. 
The Legislature's May 2 press release, issued by Legislature Press 
Coordinator Betsy Saetre, enables Quiet Rockland to alert other communities 
nationwide to how our county is fighting FAA injustice, while the related 
Senate proceedings - on C-SPAN2 - hopefully empower those communities to 
take similar action. The Robert "Bobby" Sturgell FAA has allowed at least 
hundreds of thousands of passengers to fly on cracked airplanes; tolerates 
low-fuel landings at Newark Liberty and elsewhere; has brought us an 
unacceptable number of near-misses and runway incursions; and seemingly 
would rather threaten whistleblower inspectors than solve airplane safety 
problems, in turn triggering FBI and congressional investigations. Some of 
those affected aircraft, or ones like them, could end up among the 400 or 
more planes per day that the redesign threatens to regularly run at low 
altitudes through the Route 304-to-306 corridor. Our county's 
now-almost-yearlong fight against the redesign is not simply a pursuit to 
prevent noise and air pollution in our backyards. This is about a rogue 
failed federal agency and restoring safety to our skies. The writer is a 
co-founder of Quiet Rockland, www.quietrockland.com. 
http://lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080505/OPINION/805050312/-1/SPORTS

                               @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

                                                    Important Aviation News 
Stories This Week

Controllers: Airspace redesign causing wrong turns at Newark

By DAVID PORTER | Associated Press Writer

May 10, 2008 
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--newark-airspaceco0510may10,0,6805516.story
NEWARK, N.J. - A new takeoff pattern aimed at easing congestion at Newark 
Liberty International Airport has confused some pilots and led to several 
incidents in which planes turned in the wrong direction, according to the 
union that represents air traffic controllers.

Three of the incidents occurred in the last nine days, according to Ray 
Adams, vice president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association 
union at Newark.

Many pilots aren't notified of the specifics of the new pattern until they 
are on the runway preparing to take off, Adams said.

"It's throwing a wrench into the works, basically," he said. Jim Peters, a 
spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, confirmed an incident on 
May 1 involving a United Airlines flight that turned the wrong way on 
departure. But he said FAA logs had no record of two separate incidents on 
May 8 involving planes operated by Virgin Atlantic and Continental.

Adams and Newark union president Ed Kragh contend, however, that a 
controller noted the incidents, which occurred within about an hour of each 
other, and notified a supervisor in writing. None of the incidents placed 
planes in imminent danger, Adams said.

On a recording from the Newark air traffic control tower last month obtained 
by The Associated Press, pilots of several planes that are minutes from 
takeoff are heard expressing unfamiliarity with the new pattern.

"That's a negative," a JetBlue pilot says when a controller asks if he's 
familiar with it. "Here's how it's going to work," the controller begins.

About two minutes later, another pilot asked the same question responds, "I 
don't know that we are."

Air traffic controllers at Newark have been pushing the FAA to "publish" the 
new pattern so that its chart is included in a book kept in every plane's 
cockpit. Peters said Friday the FAA won't publish it until more work is done 
on the overall airspace redesign.

Airlines were alerted to the new procedure by the FAA before it was 
instituted in December, and it is referred to in bulletins contained in the 
Airport Terminal Information Service, which pilots can access when they 
enter the cockpit and which also provides weather updates.

According to Kragh, that reference is not specific enough. He said when the 
new procedure was implemented, Newark controllers initially gave pilots 
specific information about the takeoff procedure when they first made 
contact with the tower, about 30 minutes before takeoff.

That prompted so many questions from pilots that it interfered with 
controllers' ability to carry out their duties, Kragh said, and controllers 
were ordered by supervisors not to specify the new procedure until planes 
were on the runway. The FAA did not comment on that claim.

The new takeoff pattern from Newark is part of the first phase of a general 
redesign of the airspace around New York. The plan also included a cap on 
the number of flights at JFK Airport.

Congestion at the region's three major airports _ Newark, JFK and La Guardia 
_ have been blamed in recent federal reports for causing significant delays 
nationwide.

At Newark, planes departing to the southwest have historically turned to the 
left immediately on takeoff. Under the new procedure, they can be directed 
to turn to the right.

The new pattern is used during peak times to allow planes to depart with 
less distance between them since their paths will diverge once they are 
airborne, according to Kragh.

When a pilot turns the wrong way on takeoff, that can put the planes closer 
together than is allowed under FAA regulations, Kragh said.

According to Peters, the fault lies with the pilots.

"The responsibility for acknowledging air traffic control instructions rests 
with the flight crew," he said. "If they don't comply with those 
instructions, it's pilot deviation."

Adams said the wrong turns place more stress on pilots during the crucial 
first minutes of a flight.

"Is it an imminent collision threat? No," he said. "Generally a controller 
can catch it. But it causes confusion and additional workload, which does 
raise the risk of potential problems."
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 06:34:28 -0400   author:   Bill Mulcahy

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us