"kT"  wrote in message
news:Z8TPi.16$EU2.14@newsfe04.lga...
> Fuji wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 8:31 am, kT  wrote:
> >> Green Turtle wrote:
> >>> It is nothing short of a remarkable blunder of the Noble
committee to lend
> >>> their credibility to Gore.
> >> What does the Nobel prize committee have to do with
scientific veracity?
> >> It's an honor, not a result.
> > If Al Gore were honorable, he would refuse to accept such a
> > tainted prize.
> And throw all that good money away?
> He donated it, you idiot.

Well he would wouldn't he?
This money would be peanuts compared to the "swindle" money
pouring in.
He's too busy raking in the loot from his "day job", viz: his AGW
preaching.

Too bad he doen't practice what he preaches, eh?
Just shows how much he believes this rubbish, n'est ce pas?

We're all going to hell in a handbasket!

Remember when the Nobel prize meant something and we could all
look up it with awe and respect?

Now a winning chook raffle ticket has more respectability.

Sadly, it now appears that the loony left wing fringe has taken
over the Nobel committee and awarded the peace prize to a proven
lying and exaggerating hypocrite who won't even practice what he
preaches!

At least he's in good company, with other recipients, inter alia,
being that
murdering terrorist Yassar Arafat and that corrupt UN official
Kofi Anan!



Regards

Bonzo

[Climate change theory became the main focus of extremists after]
"world communism failed, the Wall came down and a lot of
peaceniks and political activists moved into the environmental
movement bringing their neo-Marxism with them and learnt to used
green language in a very clever way to cloak agendas that have
more to do with anti-capitalism and anti-globalisation than ...
ecology or science." Patrick Moore, Co-founder-Greenpeace