It is hard these days to keep up with the accelerating reworking
of national and international climate policies. On Monday, the US
Administration pre-empted a preparatory G8/climate meeting
between Angela Merkel and Tony Blair by announcing, in Berlin no
less, an energetic, new approach to international climate policy:
'We're doing better in recent years on reducing greenhouse gas
emissions than you folks - so why don't you join our
technology-driven path to success instead of sending Chinese
communists billions of Euros for worthless carbon credits? '
(excuse my rather rough translation of diplomatic niceties)

EXTRACT FROM: Post-Kyoto: A whole new ballgame
By Benny Peiser, Liverpool John Moores University (UK)
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/climate_change/001106benny_peiser_handica.html

Regards

Bonzo

"Kyoto was about hobbling America's economy, to give socialist
Europe a fighting chance". Margaret Wallstrom, EU Vice President
of EU Communications

No he minces American soldiers puting them through
the meat grinder in Iraq.

"Bonzo"  wrote in message 
news:470c7279$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>
> It is hard these days to keep up with the accelerating reworking
> of national and international climate policies. On Monday, the US
> Administration pre-empted a preparatory G8/climate meeting
> between Angela Merkel and Tony Blair by announcing, in Berlin no
> less, an energetic, new approach to international climate policy:
> 'We're doing better in recent years on reducing greenhouse gas
> emissions than you folks - so why don't you join our
> technology-driven path to success instead of sending Chinese
> communists billions of Euros for worthless carbon credits? '
> (excuse my rather rough translation of diplomatic niceties)
>
> EXTRACT FROM: Post-Kyoto: A whole new ballgame
> By Benny Peiser, Liverpool John Moores University (UK)
> http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/climate_change/001106benny_peiser_handica.html
>
> Regards
>
> Bonzo
>
> "Kyoto was about hobbling America's economy, to give socialist
> Europe a fighting chance". Margaret Wallstrom, EU Vice President
> of EU Communications
>

"HangEveryRepubliKKKan"  wrote
>> 1998 14.57  *********************o*****
>> 1999 14.33  *****************>>>>o
>> 2000 14.33  *****************>>>>>o
>> 2001 14.48  ************************o
>> 2002 14.56  *************************o**
>> 2003 14.55  **************************o*
>> 2004 14.49  *************************>>o
>> 2005 14.63  *****************************o**
>> 2006 14.54  ***************************>>>o
>>
>>   Look at all those "o"'s lined up there.

"Bonzo"  wrote
> The "0"'s are NOT THE DATA!
> They have created a trend which does not exist in the data.
> Voodoo statistics!

  Ahahahahahahahahaha... Stupid KKKonservative KKKlown. A trendline skirts
across the top of the data leaving equal portions of the data above and
below.  In this instane 10 dots above, and 14 below as a result of the crude
nature of ascii graphics.  Nevertheless it represents the best line that can
be fitted to the data based on minimizing the square of the distance between
the line and the real data.  It's called a least squares curve fit.

  You are completely ignorant when it comes to statistics and mathematics in
general aren't you Bonzo.

  Ahahahahahaha.. You don't know what statistics are, where it comes from,
how it is used, or how to use it, and yet in your vast ignorance, you seem
to think that you know more about science than all of the worlds scientists.

  "Voodoo statistics"  Ahahahahahahahah...  You need to go back to public
school and take a refresher course in basic technical literacy.

  Stupid... Stupid.. KKKonservative KKKlown....


"Bonzo"  wrote
> Here is the data which shows NO TREND!
>
> 1998 366.50 2.5721     14.57
> 1999 368.14 2.6148     14.33
> 2000 369.41 2.6399     14.33
> 2001 371.07 2.6672     14.48
> 2002 373.16 2.7032     14.56
> 2003 375.80 2.7487     14.55
> 2004 377.55 NA            14.49
> 2005 379.75 NA            14.63
> 2006 381.90 NA            14.54

  No?  Lets plot the data and find out shall we?  Here it is along with the
best linear fit to the data shown as "o".

1998 14.57  *********************o*****
1999 14.33  *****************>>>>o
2000 14.33  *****************>>>>>o
2001 14.48  ************************o
2002 14.56  *************************o**
2003 14.55  **************************o*
2004 14.49  *************************>>o
2005 14.63  *****************************o**
2006 14.54  ***************************>>>o

Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.

So Bonzo, who is paying you to post lies to this newsgroup?

"Philip Heggie"  wrote
> No he minces American soldiers puting them through
> the meat grinder in Iraq.

  Who the fuck cares?  The more Dead AmeriKKKans in Iraq and Afghanistan the 
better.

"Bonzo"  waffled in message
>
> It is hard these days to keep up with the accelerating reworking
> of nationblah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah

Tell me Bozo, what's it like marching to the beat of your own drum?