Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:07:55 GMT,    group: uk.environment        back       
The Gunns Clearfelling Handbook Volume 1   
One of the PR miracles of our time is the way Gunns have disguised land
clearing to below the roots as 'forestry'. Nothing could be further from
the truth. What they do is remove an area of bush in its entirety and cart
it to a wood-chipper. It's really 'above ground tree mining' or even 'wood
quarrying'. Their PR spin doctors have carefully nurtured an image of
'forest communities' to cover an industry running mostly for the benefit
of offshore investors and almost totally funded by taxpayers. It has to be
the scam of the millenium. It uses an entire transport system of diesel
trucks all making one way trips to the 'chipper'. There are no return
journeys making it the most inefficient transport system anywhere outside
of mining. It is massively subsidised at the state and federal level with
many crooked politicians in on the scam. What it is doing to the worlds
weather is an absolute act of insanity. A mature forest loses huge amounts
of water to evaporation. As soon as the Gunns dozers move in this is
instantly lost. It is never, ever replaced because Gunns swap a forest for
a CROP. These tree 'crops' never grow to maturity because the soils are so
depleted and the rainfall is constantly declining. Thats why plantation
timber is ALWAYS much smaller in size than native forest. It is an
ecological race to the bottom of catastrophe. It is undoubtably a truth
that wood chipping is first degree ecological homicide. That our
government is now paying billions in drought relief after funding the
cause of drought, is the biggest secret that rural Australia has to give
up. Well at least YOU are now informed.
date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:07:55 GMT   author:   Bonzo

Re: The Gunns Clearfelling Handbook Volume 1   
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan"  wrote
>> 1998 14.57  *********************o*****
>> 1999 14.33  *****************>>>>o
>> 2000 14.33  *****************>>>>>o
>> 2001 14.48  ************************o
>> 2002 14.56  *************************o**
>> 2003 14.55  **************************o*
>> 2004 14.49  *************************>>o
>> 2005 14.63  *****************************o**
>> 2006 14.54  ***************************>>>o
>>
>>   Look at all those "o"'s lined up there.

"Bonzo"  wrote
> The "0"'s are NOT THE DATA!
> They have created a trend which does not exist in the data.
> Voodoo statistics!

  Ahahahahahahahahaha... Stupid KKKonservative KKKlown. A trendline skirts
across the top of the data leaving equal portions of the data above and
below.  In this instane 10 dots above, and 14 below as a result of the crude
nature of ascii graphics.  Nevertheless it represents the best line that can
be fitted to the data based on minimizing the square of the distance between
the line and the real data.  It's called a least squares curve fit.

  You are completely ignorant when it comes to statistics and mathematics in
general aren't you Bonzo.

  Ahahahahahaha.. You don't know what statistics are, where it comes from,
how it is used, or how to use it, and yet in your vast ignorance, you seem
to think that you know more about science than all of the worlds scientists.

  "Voodoo statistics"  Ahahahahahahahah...  You need to go back to public
school and take a refresher course in basic technical literacy.

  Stupid... Stupid.. KKKonservative KKKlown....


"Bonzo"  wrote
> Here is the data which shows NO TREND!
>
> 1998 366.50 2.5721     14.57
> 1999 368.14 2.6148     14.33
> 2000 369.41 2.6399     14.33
> 2001 371.07 2.6672     14.48
> 2002 373.16 2.7032     14.56
> 2003 375.80 2.7487     14.55
> 2004 377.55 NA            14.49
> 2005 379.75 NA            14.63
> 2006 381.90 NA            14.54

  No?  Lets plot the data and find out shall we?  Here it is along with the
best linear fit to the data shown as "o".

1998 14.57  *********************o*****
1999 14.33  *****************>>>>o
2000 14.33  *****************>>>>>o
2001 14.48  ************************o
2002 14.56  *************************o**
2003 14.55  **************************o*
2004 14.49  *************************>>o
2005 14.63  *****************************o**
2006 14.54  ***************************>>>o

Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.

So Bonzo, who is paying you to post lies to this newsgroup?
date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:22:16 -0700   author:   HangEveryRepubliKKKan

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us