On Oct 4, 9:30 pm, "HangEveryRepubliKKKan"
 wrote:
>  wrote
>
> >   No, changes in earth's eccetricity due to Milankovich cycles, or
> > changes in solar input,  or natural oscillations due to Arctic melt
> > initiated the changes.  CO2, CH4 FOLLOWED this forcing from the sun,
> > or whatever. Temperatures later fell, again caused by the sun, or some
> > other
> > extraneous factor,  and CO2 and CH4 declined.
>
>   Wrong again. Shit Sucker.  The last ice age was caused by a
> synchronization in the earths' time of parahelion passage and it's axial
> inclination.
>
>   Historically it has been the conjunction of these effects that causes
> sufficient warming to drive the earth out of each ice age, and the
> opposition that triggres the onset of each ice aage.
>
>  wrote
>
> >  If the CO2 were a FORCING factor,  increased temperatures do to
> > extraneous factors would have increased CO2 and CH4, which would have
> > increased temperatures further, leading to a further increase in CO2
> > and CH4,   resulting in an exponential runaway effect.
>
>
(childish name calling deleted)

Signal amplification is below unity so the
> feedback effect does not explode as it did on Venus.  


   So you finally understand my argument that the supposed forcing
effects of CO2 are overblown- A. McIntire