Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: 18 Sep 2008 10:27:45 GMT,    group: uk.d-i-y        back       
Re: Totally OT - Cling Film   
In article ,
	"TheScullster"  writes:
> Hi all
> Just a daft question on the subject of cling film.
> Has anyone noticed it getting thinner lately?
> There was a time when, no matter what brand you got, it would pull off the 
> roll fairly reliably.
> Now, all brands seem more inclined to tear away from the roll ends which is 
> maddening when you are getting the sarnies ready last minute to head out the 
> door.  The film itself does actually feel thinner.
> Does anyone have recommendation for more rhobust product?

I think the non-microwave-safe variety has vanished from the scene.
That was more stretchable and less likely to tear. It could leach
plasticisers into food, when in contact with oils and fats in
particular, and that maybe why it's gone.

-- 
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]
date: 18 Sep 2008 10:27:45 GMT   author:   (Andrew Gabriel)

Re: Totally OT - Cling Film   
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> In article ,
> 	"TheScullster"  writes:
>> Hi all
>> Just a daft question on the subject of cling film.
>> Has anyone noticed it getting thinner lately?
>> There was a time when, no matter what brand you got, it would pull off the 
>> roll fairly reliably.
>> Now, all brands seem more inclined to tear away from the roll ends which is 
>> maddening when you are getting the sarnies ready last minute to head out the 
>> door.  The film itself does actually feel thinner.
>> Does anyone have recommendation for more rhobust product?
> 
> I think the non-microwave-safe variety has vanished from the scene.
> That was more stretchable and less likely to tear. It could leach
> plasticisers into food, when in contact with oils and fats in
> particular, and that maybe why it's gone.

Yes, IIRC there was a scare about that, about 15 years ago?

David
date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:43:41 +0100   author:   Lobster

Re: Totally OT - Cling Film   
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:43:41 +0100, Lobster
 wrote:

>Andrew Gabriel wrote:
>> In article ,
>> 	"TheScullster"  writes:
>>> Hi all
>>> Just a daft question on the subject of cling film.
>>> Has anyone noticed it getting thinner lately?
>>> There was a time when, no matter what brand you got, it would pull off the 
>>> roll fairly reliably.
>>> Now, all brands seem more inclined to tear away from the roll ends which is 
>>> maddening when you are getting the sarnies ready last minute to head out the 
>>> door.  The film itself does actually feel thinner.
>>> Does anyone have recommendation for more rhobust product?
>> 
>> I think the non-microwave-safe variety has vanished from the scene.
>> That was more stretchable and less likely to tear. It could leach
>> plasticisers into food, when in contact with oils and fats in
>> particular, and that maybe why it's gone.
>
>Yes, IIRC there was a scare about that, about 15 years ago?
>

It's not gone away viz. newsnight a couple of nights ago. Wrt plastic
bottles and food containers, packaging and labels.

Derek
date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:17:22 +0100   author:   Derek

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us