Cooker gas connection
Hi all
What's the current thinking on the best method for sealing the connection at
the 'gas in' connector and bayonet hose on a gas cooker.
1 turn of appropriate PTFE or compound/paste ?
Cheers
Jim
date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:35:20 +0100
author: Jim
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
Jim wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What's the current thinking on the best method for sealing the
> connection at the 'gas in' connector and bayonet hose on a gas
> cooker.
> 1 turn of appropriate PTFE or compound/paste ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
I always use a couple of turns of gas PTFE then test with dilute Fairy.
Si
date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:20:43 +0100
author: Mungo \Two Sheds\ Toadfoot
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
Jim wrote:
> What's the current thinking on the best method for sealing the connection at
> the 'gas in' connector and bayonet hose on a gas cooker.
>
> 1 turn of appropriate PTFE or compound/paste ?
You mean the threaded connection on the cooker itself that the hose
connects to? Gas PTFE, and a test with leak detector spray.
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:54:46 +0100
author: John Rumm
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
John Rumm wrote:
> Jim wrote:
>
>> What's the current thinking on the best method for sealing the
>> connection at the 'gas in' connector and bayonet hose on a gas cooker.
Bayonet connector could do with a wipe of kitchen oil. I wrongly
connected our hob with a flex hose and I have had problems (not many)
with it. And kitchen oil has cured it. It is secure now, until I put the
piping right.
> 1 turn of appropriate PTFE or compound/paste ?
>
>
> You mean the threaded connection on the cooker itself that the hose
> connects to? Gas PTFE, and a test with leak detector spray.
Are those gas detector sprays any good?
As I may have said before, I have worked with many gasses that are much
more dangerous than North Sea gas.
My standard method for leak detection was along your lines. A bit of
washing up liquid and some water. But on its own, it can't detect tiny
leaks, or even not tiny leaks.
My method was to surround the joint with a collar of foam by agitating
the brush around the joint, until it had a collar of foam bubbles around it.
If you can't get a collar, then you have quite a large leak. The
escaping gas is blowing the bubble apart before you can see it
If you get a collar, then you have to look out for tiny leaks by
observing the bubbles. Any growth means that you have a leak. You will
need a mirror to do this and a bright light.
Take care if you are not certain what you are doing.
Dave
date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:48:16 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
Dave wrote:
>> You mean the threaded connection on the cooker itself that the hose
>> connects to? Gas PTFE, and a test with leak detector spray.
>
> Are those gas detector sprays any good?
They are ok, although some work better than others IME... not as good as
a pressure drop test with a manometer obviously. The main advantage of
washing up liquid is you know they should not be corrosive for any of
the components.
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:20:27 +0100
author: John Rumm
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
"John Rumm" wrote in message
news:juKdnWg315D3JynVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
> The main advantage of washing up liquid is you know they should not be
> corrosive for any of the components.
Washing up liquid is very corrosive for iron parts.. nearly all of it uses
salt as a thickening agent.
Its best to wash it off.
Its why you don't use washing up liquid to wash cars.
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:01:35 +0100
author: dennis@home
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
John Rumm wrote:
> The main advantage of washing up liquid is you know they should not
> be corrosive for any of the components.
You meant the main advantage *over* WUL, presumably?
--
Andy
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:39:36 +0100
author: Andy Wade
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
John Rumm wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>
>>> You mean the threaded connection on the cooker itself that the hose
>>> connects to? Gas PTFE, and a test with leak detector spray.
>>
>> Are those gas detector sprays any good?
>
> They are ok, although some work better than others IME... not as good as
> a pressure drop test with a manometer obviously. The main advantage of
> washing up liquid is you know they should not be corrosive for any of
Sorry, that ought to be "advantage *over* washing up liquid"
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:13:32 +0100
author: John Rumm
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "John Rumm" wrote in message
> news:juKdnWg315D3JynVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>
>> The main advantage of washing up liquid is you know they should not be
>> corrosive for any of the components.
>
> Washing up liquid is very corrosive for iron parts.. nearly all of it
> uses salt as a thickening agent.
> Its best to wash it off.
yup, typo, sorry.
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:13:57 +0100
author: John Rumm
|
Re: Cooker gas connection
Andy Wade wrote:
> John Rumm wrote:
>
>> The main advantage of washing up liquid is you know they should not
>> be corrosive for any of the components.
>
> You meant the main advantage *over* WUL, presumably?
Indeed...
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:14:16 +0100
author: John Rumm
|