Re: On an energy efficency drive!!
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:21:19 +0100 someone who may be The Natural
Philosopher <a@b.c> wrote this:-
>You deny that britain at least had an independent nuclear deterrent?
>that the bombs set off in Australia were not nuclear? even though you
>can take a geiger counter there to this day...and get a reading?
Nice try. Do keep this sort of attempt up.
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54
date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:51:55 +0100
author: David Hansen
|
Re: On an energy efficency drive!!
David Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:21:19 +0100 someone who may be The Natural
> Philosopher <a@b.c> wrote this:-
>
>> You deny that britain at least had an independent nuclear deterrent?
>> that the bombs set off in Australia were not nuclear? even though you
>> can take a geiger counter there to this day...and get a reading?
>
> Nice try. Do keep this sort of attempt up.
>
>
So you DO deny it?
date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:52:24 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|