Yet another dumbed down programme.
-- 

Martin

"Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message 
news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
> Yet another dumbed down programme.

Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who "opened 
up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in London on the 
same?

It was so bad you just had to see if it got better. It didn't.

Katie Price has less faked bits.


Brian

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:34:34 -0000, "Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote:

>
>"Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message 
>news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
>> Yet another dumbed down programme.
>
>Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who "opened 
>up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in London on the 
>same?

A couple who lived in a one room basement flat!

If anything it was worse. Somebody had gone to great effort to pick people for
their oddness rather than for their potential to be partners of Raymond Blanc.

>
>It was so bad you just had to see if it got better. It didn't.

I'm glad I gave up with that one. 

>
>Katie Price has less faked bits.

LOL
-- 

Martin

In article <1jzGm.43400$fq2.32348@newsfe18.ams2>, Brian Reay 
<see@website.invalid> writes
>
>"Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message
>news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
>> Yet another dumbed down programme.
>
>Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who "opened
>up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in London on the
>same?

Didn't watch that but did see occasional bits of the Restaurant.

I had to laugh at the couple who chose gravad lax for their fine dining 
offering, but didn't appear to realise that it could be made rather than 
just unwrapped from a plastic packet.

I wasn't surprised to see one couple go straight away, but surprised 
others made it through.

It looked like the contestants were recruited from the queue waiting to 
see another programme - Strictly Come Dancing perhaps.
-- 
congokid
Eating out in London? Read my tips...
http://congokid.com

In message <OMN+AKChmt6KFwTS@congokid.demon.co.uk>, congokid 
 writes
>In article <1jzGm.43400$fq2.32348@newsfe18.ams2>, Brian Reay 
><see@website.invalid> writes
>>
>>"Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
>>> Yet another dumbed down programme.
>>
>>Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who "opened
>>up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in London on the
>>same?
>
>Didn't watch that but did see occasional bits of the Restaurant.
>
>I had to laugh at the couple who chose gravad lax for their fine dining 
>offering, but didn't appear to realise that it could be made rather 
>than just unwrapped from a plastic packet.
>
>I wasn't surprised to see one couple go straight away, but surprised 
>others made it through.
>
>It looked like the contestants were recruited from the queue waiting to 
>see another programme - Strictly Come Dancing perhaps.

It was on TV when I arrived home from work last night and I find it 
amazing that out of all the people who must have applied to go on the 
show, the judges, including the big man himself, came over as being so 
incompetent as to choose such useless contestants.  I would certainly 
think twice about going into business with the so-called judges, never 
mind them going into business with the contestants.  It would appear to 
be very over-rated.
-- 
June Hughes

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:18:41 +0000, congokid  wrote:

>In article <1jzGm.43400$fq2.32348@newsfe18.ams2>, Brian Reay 
><see@website.invalid> writes
>>
>>"Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
>>> Yet another dumbed down programme.
>>
>>Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who "opened
>>up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in London on the
>>same?
>
>Didn't watch that but did see occasional bits of the Restaurant.
>
>I had to laugh at the couple who chose gravad lax for their fine dining 
>offering, but didn't appear to realise that it could be made rather than 
>just unwrapped from a plastic packet.

They didn't actually buy or make any, despite the wife having had "relationships
with Laplanders". She served a salad with poor quality Scottish salmon just as
it came out of the packet.

>
>I wasn't surprised to see one couple go straight away, but surprised 
>others made it through.
>
>It looked like the contestants were recruited from the queue waiting to 
>see another programme - Strictly Come Dancing perhaps.

More like the unemployable from a Job Centre.
-- 

Martin

The message <MrrN$YDx2t6KFwQI@theacct.demon.co.uk>
from June Hughes  contains these words:


> It was on TV when I arrived home from work last night and I find it 
> amazing that out of all the people who must have applied to go on the 
> show, the judges, including the big man himself, came over as being so 
> incompetent as to choose such useless contestants. 

   The whole focus of many  TV programmes, seems to be to  trigger as
many tears,  stupid cockups and showdowns as possible.
   They  must choose contestants accordingly. The Apprentice  is an example.
   It's the modern equivalent of  going to  Bedlam to laugh at 
lunatics; or throwing eggs at people in the stocks.
  
     Janet

In message , Janet Baraclough 
 writes
>The message <MrrN$YDx2t6KFwQI@theacct.demon.co.uk>
>from June Hughes  contains these words:
>
>
>> It was on TV when I arrived home from work last night and I find it
>> amazing that out of all the people who must have applied to go on the
>> show, the judges, including the big man himself, came over as being so
>> incompetent as to choose such useless contestants.
>
>   The whole focus of many  TV programmes, seems to be to  trigger as
>many tears,  stupid cockups and showdowns as possible.

>   They  must choose contestants accordingly. The Apprentice  is an example.

I have never seen the Apprentice and have no intention of starting now.
>   It's the modern equivalent of  going to  Bedlam to laugh at
>lunatics; or throwing eggs at people in the stocks.
>
But the big man is not a lunatic (at least I don't think he is).  He is 
a businessman with a reputation.  Perhaps he needs the money.  From what 
I saw last night, the show did nothing for his reputation.
-- 
June Hughes

The message 
from June Hughes  contains these words:

> In message , Janet Baraclough 
>  writes
> >The message <MrrN$YDx2t6KFwQI@theacct.demon.co.uk>
> >from June Hughes  contains these words:
> >
> >
> >> It was on TV when I arrived home from work last night and I find it
> >> amazing that out of all the people who must have applied to go on the
> >> show, the judges, including the big man himself, came over as being so
> >> incompetent as to choose such useless contestants.
> >
> >   The whole focus of many  TV programmes, seems to be to  trigger as
> >many tears,  stupid cockups and showdowns as possible.

> >   They  must choose contestants accordingly. The Apprentice  is an
> >   example.

> I have never seen the Apprentice and have no intention of starting now.
> >   It's the modern equivalent of  going to  Bedlam to laugh at
> >lunatics; or throwing eggs at people in the stocks.
> >
> But the big man is not a lunatic (at least I don't think he is).

  The contestants he chooses, are no doubt selected  for the 
"entertainment" value.
of their worst qualities. 
 
  He is 
> a businessman with a reputation.

   So is Alan Sugar. Obviously he considers the exposure is worth
something to his business or reputation,
though I can't imagine what. 

   Janet

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:52:30 +0000, June Hughes 
wrote:


>But the big man is not a lunatic (at least I don't think he is).  He is 
>a businessman with a reputation.  Perhaps he needs the money.  From what 
>I saw last night, the show did nothing for his reputation.

It's the third series.
-- 

Martin

In article , June Hughes 
 writes

>I have never seen the Apprentice and have no intention of starting now.

When it's on I prefer to read the Guardian live blog about it - much 
funnier.

It's rather an odd phenomenon - watching a programme while reading a 
journalist commentating live on it, as well as posts from others who are 
either watching the programme, too, or just contributing to the blog - 
but somehow it works.
-- 
congokid
Eating out in London? Read my tips...
http://congokid.com

Brian Reay wrote:

> 
> "Martin" <me@address.invalid> wrote in message
> news:31gle5h04jotjp6056fjf2emg1081v4crh@4ax.com...
>> Yet another dumbed down programme.
> 
> Was it as bad as the one on Monday about the couple from Norfolk who
> "opened up" their house as a restaurant and advised another couple in
> London on the same?
> 
> It was so bad you just had to see if it got better. It didn't.
Not so long ago in another thread, you were asking "Do people really
watch such rubbish TV?".  It seems now that you like this sort of
braindead puerile rubbish as much as the next person. You couldn't
even "manage" to change channels could you, fatso couch potato. A very
big dose of double standards here methinks.
> 
> Katie Price has less faked bits.

More double standards! You know a lot about faked bits..... don't you Mr
Fatwigwearer!
> 
> 
> Brian

> More double standards! You know a lot about faked bits..... don't you Mr
> Fatwigwearer!

Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
 wrote:

>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!

and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES

Paul Starship wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>  wrote:
> 
>>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
> 
> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES

Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?






Martin

>>>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
> means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
>>
>

I had a good look at Kempton this year...so if it is one it is a VERY good 
one !!! .... and no, I detest The Masons my industry is rife with them...and 
some real ones.......and I left the RSGB years ogo ........

"Paul Starship"  wrote in message 
news:4aedf149.1200921@news.albasani.net...
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>  wrote:
>
>>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>
> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
>

what about shoes???? .........

Martin Wilson wrote:
> Paul Starship wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
> means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
>> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
> 
> Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Martin
> 
Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!

Shirley.

"Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:hckv2r$fkt$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Martin Wilson wrote:
>> Paul Starship wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
>> means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
>>> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
>>
>> Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Martin
>>
> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>
> Shirley.

I know...I'm just not that stupid ! .........

> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>
> Shirley.

All I want to be now is retired ....5 months to go !!!!!!

Jim Stewart ... wrote:
> "Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
> news:hckv2r$fkt$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Martin Wilson wrote:
>>> Paul Starship wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>>> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
>>> means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
>>>> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
>>> Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
>> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>>
>> Shirley.
> 
> I know...I'm just not that stupid ! ......... 
> 
> 

Its alright Jim, Martin is stupid enough for both of you if he thinks 
your a masonic RSGB member! Laugh I nearly paid your RSGB membership fees!

Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
>> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>>
>> Shirley.
> 
> All I want to be now is retired ....5 months to go !!!!!! 
> 
> 

Got an offer?

>I nearly paid your RSGB membership fees!


freeloader!

"Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:hckv92$fkt$3@news.eternal-september.org...
> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>>> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can 
>>> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>>>
>>> Shirley.
>>
>> All I want to be now is retired ....5 months to go !!!!!!
>
> Got an offer?

yip...minted....

"Jim Stewart ..."  wrote in message 
news:hmnHm.743$Ym4.384@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> "Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
> news:hckv92$fkt$3@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>>>> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong 
>>>> can you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>>>>
>>>> Shirley.
>>>
>>> All I want to be now is retired ....5 months to go !!!!!!
>>
>> Got an offer?
>
> yip...minted....
>
that 6  and 2/3 added years making 40 in total certainly is an offer you 
can't refuse especially when you are in therapy ........

Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>> I nearly paid your RSGB membership fees!
> 
> 
> freeloader! 
> 
> 

No I've paid my fees! :-)

"Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:hcl003$mq0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>>> I nearly paid your RSGB membership fees!
>>
>>
>> freeloader!
>
> No I've paid my fees! :-)
>

...you want to pay MY fees then ? .......

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 +0000, Jim Stewart ... wrote:

>> More double standards! You know a lot about faked bits..... don't you
>> Mr Fatwigwearer!
> 
> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!

  Did it blow away in today's gales?

-- 

Jim, G4RGA

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:35:38 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
 wrote:

>what about shoes???? ......... 

==============================================================
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.reay@(spamstopper)bigAAAA.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Train the trainers update
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:13:54 -0000
Message-ID: 

"Stan"  wrote in message
news:QvpZd.4453$QN1.4308@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
 >
>  I am sorry to hear you have injured your foot. I specifically recall
noting
> your footwear, and your shoe style has not changed over the last two
years.

What normal person takes any notice of another's shoes at a amateur
radio rally?

Last chap who posted details of my shoes on here seemed to have some
odd obsessions as well. Not a friend of yours is he?
==============================================================

Paul Starship wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:35:38 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>  wrote:
> 
>> what about shoes???? ......... 
> 
> ==============================================================
> From: "Brian Reay" <brian.reay@(spamstopper)bigAAAA.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
> Subject: Re: Train the trainers update
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:13:54 -0000
> Message-ID: 
> 
> "Stan"  wrote in message
> news:QvpZd.4453$QN1.4308@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>  >
>>  I am sorry to hear you have injured your foot. I specifically recall
> noting
>> your footwear, and your shoe style has not changed over the last two
> years.
> 
> What normal person takes any notice of another's shoes at a amateur
> radio rally?
> 
> Last chap who posted details of my shoes on here seemed to have some
> odd obsessions as well. Not a friend of yours is he?
> ==============================================================
> 
> 

Radio amateurs are the last people to talk about odd obsessions. :-)

Jim Stewart ... wrote:
> "Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
> news:hcl003$mq0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>>>> I nearly paid your RSGB membership fees!
>>>
>>> freeloader!
>> No I've paid my fees! :-)
>>
> 
> ...you want to pay MY fees then ? ....... 
> 
> 

Maybe when I retire with my lump sum. I might even pay Spike's and ruin 
his 'unblemished' record of non membership! :-)

Len GM0ONX

"Paul Starship"  wrote in message 
news:4aee1183.9451171@news.albasani.net...
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:35:38 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>  wrote:
>
>>what about shoes???? .........
>
> ==============================================================
> From: "Brian Reay" <brian.reay@(spamstopper)bigAAAA.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
> Subject: Re: Train the trainers update
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:13:54 -0000
> Message-ID: 
>
> "Stan"  wrote in message
> news:QvpZd.4453$QN1.4308@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
>>  I am sorry to hear you have injured your foot. I specifically recall
> noting
>> your footwear, and your shoe style has not changed over the last two
> years.
>
> What normal person takes any notice of another's shoes at a amateur
> radio rally?
>
> Last chap who posted details of my shoes on here seemed to have some
> odd obsessions as well. Not a friend of yours is he?
> ==============================================================
>
>
Shocking! ...

"Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:hcl3p9$n0h$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Paul Starship wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:35:38 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> what about shoes???? .........
>>
>> ==============================================================
>> From: "Brian Reay" <brian.reay@(spamstopper)bigAAAA.com>
>> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
>> Subject: Re: Train the trainers update
>> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:13:54 -0000
>> Message-ID: 
>>
>> "Stan"  wrote in message
>> news:QvpZd.4453$QN1.4308@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>  >
>>>  I am sorry to hear you have injured your foot. I specifically recall
>> noting
>>> your footwear, and your shoe style has not changed over the last two
>> years.
>>
>> What normal person takes any notice of another's shoes at a amateur
>> radio rally?
>>
>> Last chap who posted details of my shoes on here seemed to have some
>> odd obsessions as well. Not a friend of yours is he?
>> ==============================================================
>>
>>
>
> Radio amateurs are the last people to talk about odd obsessions. :-)
>

yes we are all weirdoes .... except hammy mens who think they are all normal 
...... because they think it is normal to lie cheat and steal their way 
through life ......

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:47:57 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
 wrote:


>> Got an offer?
>
>yip...minted.... 

Did it involve a horse's head?

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
 wrote:

>
>
>> More double standards! You know a lot about faked bits..... don't you Mr
>> Fatwigwearer!
>
>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!


http://tinyurl.com/ykj44qq

Jim Stewart ... wrote:

>> Radio amateurs are the last people to talk about odd obsessions. :-)
>>
> 
> yes we are all weirdoes .... except hammy mens who think they are all normal 
> ...... because they think it is normal to lie cheat and steal their way 
> through life ...... 
> 
> 

We are all normal to ourselves!

On 1 Nov, 21:52, "Jim Stewart ..."  wrote:
> "Jim Stewart ..."  wrote in messagenews:hmnHm.743$Ym4.384@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> > "Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message
> >news:hckv92$fkt$3@news.eternal-september.org...
> >> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
> >>>> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong
> >>>> can you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>
> >>>> Shirley.
>
> >>> All I want to be now is retired ....5 months to go !!!!!!
>
> >> Got an offer?
>
> > yip...minted....
>
> that 6  and 2/3 added years making 40 in total certainly is an offer you
> can't refuse especially when you are in therapy ........

Should do wonders for the blood presure. You've probably got a case
for unfair dismissal, being under the shrink and all but I'm guessing
you reliquish all rights under employment law when you take early
retirement - Might be worth checking with the Union.

Sounds like a great deal though, maybe you could set up a nice little
CB shop in Refren. or go into partnership with Tox and the dark lord.

On 1 Nov, 21:37, Len GM0ONX  wrote:
> Martin Wilson wrote:
> > Paul Starship wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
> >>  wrote:
>
> >>> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
> > I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by all
> > means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason chummies?
> >> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
>
> > Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?
>
> > Martin
>
> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong can
> you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
>
> Shirley.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No, but I have it on good information that Jim is in the Buffs and
also an avid member of REACT.

Should do wonders for the blood presure. You've probably got a case
for unfair dismissal, being under the shrink and all but I'm guessing
you reliquish all rights under employment law when you take early
retirement - Might be worth checking with the Union.

Sounds like a great deal though, maybe you could set up a nice little
CB shop in Refren. or go into partnership with Tox and the dark lord.

me now........who cares just as long as I get out of here and away from 
their "management tourniquets"

"Jimbo onthe netbook with embedded sim ..."  
wrote in message news:hcmmn2$q9r$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
> Should do wonders for the blood presure. You've probably got a case
> for unfair dismissal, being under the shrink and all but I'm guessing
> you reliquish all rights under employment law when you take early
> retirement - Might be worth checking with the Union.
>
> Sounds like a great deal though, maybe you could set up a nice little
> CB shop in Refren. or go into partnership with Tox and the dark lord.
>
> me now........who cares just as long as I get out of here and away from 
> their "management tourniquets"
>
sorrry that was the spoilchunker.....should have been "techniques"....then 
again......

"Jimbo onthe netbook with embedded sim ..."  
wrote in message news:hcmmrk$rf0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Jimbo onthe netbook with embedded sim ..."  
> wrote in message news:hcmmn2$q9r$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>
>>
>> Should do wonders for the blood presure. You've probably got a case
>> for unfair dismissal, being under the shrink and all but I'm guessing
>> you reliquish all rights under employment law when you take early
>> retirement - Might be worth checking with the Union.
>>
>> Sounds like a great deal though, maybe you could set up a nice little
>> CB shop in Refren. or go into partnership with Tox and the dark lord.
>>
>> me now........who cares just as long as I get out of here and away from 
>> their "management tourniquets"
>>
> sorrry that was the spoilchunker.....should have been "techniques"....then 
> again......
>
and Union? ....don't make me laugh !!!!

anyway nice of them to let me take my lunch break at my desk ..........and I 
still get interrupted........

Jim Stewart ... wrote:

> 
> 
>>>>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by
>> all means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason
>> chummies?
>>>
>>
> 
> I had a good look at Kempton this year...so if it is one it is a VERY
> good one !!! .... and no, I detest The Masons my industry is rife with
> them...and some real ones.......and I left the RSGB years ogo ........
Oh Dear!

I'm sorry that I jumped to the wrong conclusion here, Jim.

You defended Brian Reay in respect of wearing wigs and I assumed,
wrongly, that you were either one of his sycophants or a sock-puppet.

As for Masons, my profession is also over run by them, mostly promoted
by their mates up to levels beyond their ability. So I do know exactly
how you feel about these twats.

Simon confirms that you are one of the good guys, which adds to my
embarrassment!  

I offer my apology wholeheartedly.

Martin

Len GM0ONX wrote:

> Martin Wilson wrote:
>> Paul Starship wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:08:09 GMT, "Jim Stewart ..."
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by
>> all means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason
>> chummies?
>>> and for gods sake...dont mention  SHOES
>> 
>> Shoes?..... Are his feet artificial too?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
> Hee Hee Hee! Priceless! Jim a Freemason and a RSGB member, how wrong
> can you get? Martin, you are the weakest link, goodbye!
> 
> Shirley.

Hello Len/Shirley

I was the weakest link! I didn't know the difference between an idealist
and an idiot. 

I do now!

Are you using your wife's computer or do you have other issues
Len/Shirley? 

Martin

"Martin Wilson"  wrote in message 
news:4aef3215@x-privat.org...
> Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>>>Look...I told you all...HE DOESN'T WEAR A WIG!!!!!!!!!
>>> I think you will find that he does. It is common knowledge. But by
>>> all means stick up for him. Are you one of his RSGB freemason
>>> chummies?
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> I had a good look at Kempton this year...so if it is one it is a VERY
>> good one !!! .... and no, I detest The Masons my industry is rife with
>> them...and some real ones.......and I left the RSGB years ogo ........
> Oh Dear!
>
> I'm sorry that I jumped to the wrong conclusion here, Jim.
>
> You defended Brian Reay in respect of wearing wigs and I assumed,
> wrongly, that you were either one of his sycophants or a sock-puppet.
>
> As for Masons, my profession is also over run by them, mostly promoted
> by their mates up to levels beyond their ability. So I do know exactly
> how you feel about these twats.
>
> Simon confirms that you are one of the good guys, which adds to my
> embarrassment!
>
> I offer my apology wholeheartedly.
>
> Martin

good man...no problem...carry on..... :)))