On Oct 29, 10:50 am, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:40:47 -0700 (PDT), CP  wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Oct 29, 10:10 am, "Tim C."  wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:39:19 퍍 (GMT), Jane Gillett wrote in post :
> >> <news:50b1b9038ej.gillett@higherstert.co.uk> :
>
> >> > No idea whether H1N1 is germ warfare - why should it be?
>
> >> It's a plot by the pharmatocracy to increase profits.
>
> >> If it is it's very poorly thought out and full of faults. So I suppose it
> >> must be germ warfare, as we know that the moon landings were faked and that
> >> the WTC/pentagon attacks were US government conspiracies.  :-)  
>
> >Don't know about the moon landings - and don't much care - but am
> >pretty sure that the WTC/Pentagon attacks weren't carried out by 19
> >incompetent Saudis, masterminded by a man on a dialysis machine in a
> >cave near Kabul!
>
> At least you are consistent.

It's all a matter of personal preference, isn't it? You prefer the US
government's conspiracy theory; I don't. Neither of us has any cast-
iron evidence, but is swayed by what each of us believes to be the
more probable scenario.

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:33:34 +0100, "Tim C."  wrote:

>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:30:45 +0100, Martin wrote in post :
><news:cngje5lsf2t10ubl8m44g59h58n500ef69@4ax.com> :
>
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:24:47 +0100, "Tim C."  wrote:
>> 
>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:28:22 +0100, Martin wrote in post :
>>><news:f7cje59t6hdate0gml64q5n81mq4erse6u@4ax.com> :
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:57:48 +0100, "Tim C."  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:02:24 -0700 (PDT), CP wrote in post : 
>>>>><news:a460624b-b434-46e5-b8b1-c21dc32920c6@t2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 29, 12:22 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't believe conspiracy theories at all, you seem to be a sucker for them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The US government's explanation for 911 *is* a conspiracy theory: they
>>>>>> claim that a group of Saudi terrorists conspired, which in anyone's
>>>>>> book makes it a conspiracy theory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It makes the Saudi's plan a conspiracy. It doesn't make the US Govt's 
>>>>>explanation a conspiracy. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The whole point is this: which conspiracy theory makes more sense?
>>>>>
>>>>>Which one? The theory that says that the Saudis did it? Or the theory that 
>>>>>says the US Govt. says the Saudis did it?
>>>> 
>>>> and what was incompetent about the result of the attack.
>>>
>>>I thought it went more or less to plan - assuming the the plan they had was
>>>to cause terror, devastation and chaos.  Within hours the US had lost the
>>>battle against terrorism. 
>> 
>> and a large burning hole mysteriously appeared in the Pentagon and another in
>> the middle of a field.
>
>I blame it on corn-circle makers. 

Corn-circles(TM) the aliens answer to rice crispies.
-- 

Martin

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:55:26 +0100, Martin wrote in post :
<news:qudle5lsqa6sumnionc3ct5gmuam27us6h@4ax.com> :

> Corn-circles(TM) the aliens answer to rice crispies.

 :-) 

-- 
Tim C.

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:20:39 GMT, Janet Baraclough
 wrote:

>The message <1tonjlyulh11r$.1oimolaju3yoa.dlg@40tude.net>
>from "Mike.. .  ."  contains these words:
>
>What chance bringing
>> modern education to the Middle East when even in UK 50% of people want the
>> biblical version of science taught in schools. :-(  
>
>    Where did you get that UK stat?  I've never heard of anyone in the
>UK, calling for  creationism to be taught 
>in UK schools.
>
>    Janet

What does this have to do with food and drink?