In message 
, CP 
 writes
>On Oct 28, 5:07 pm, June Hughes 
>wrote:
>> In message
>> , CP
>>  writes
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Oct 28, 8:07 am, June Hughes 
>> >wrote:
>> >> In message
>> >> , CP
>> >>  writes
>>
>> >> >On Oct 28, 7:00 am, June Hughes 
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> In message <l5LFm.293691$cf6.45...@newsfe16.iad>, graham
>> >> >>  writes
>>
>> >> >> >"CP"  wrote in message
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>>news:186e3c87-8f3e-4c76-8b49-b61b3d5ea142@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
>> >> >> >> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
>> >> >> >> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>>
>> >> >> >> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu 
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> produced.
>> >> >> >> What real evidence have you to support your claim?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Those who are not
>> >> >> >> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
>> >> >> >> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
>> >> >> >> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>>
>> >> >> >> In your opinion as a medical expert?
>>
>> >> >> >Here are the opinions of a number of medical experts. And when I say
>> >> >> >experts, I'm not talking about the type of practitioners you call
>> >> >> >'quacks':
>>
>> >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1K74Tnrrok
>> >> >> >________________________________________________
>>
>> >> >> >Same old conspiracy theories and scare tactics about Hg &Al in
>> >> >> >the vaccines
>> >> >> >causing, inter alia, autism.  Note that Andrew Wakefield was 
>> >> >> >one of the
>> >> >> >speakers and he has been thoroughly discredited.  Some of 
>> >> >> >those in this
>> >> >> >video are NOT medical experts and one of the physicians ought 
>> >> >> >to have her
>> >> >> >arse kicked for some of what she said.
>>
>> >> >> Yes Graham, but CP knows best.  Who are we to argue?
>>
>> >> >Did I say that I know best? I was merely sharing the opinions of
>> >> >others, and proffering my own. Is there a crime in that?
>>
>> >> Did I say there was?  There are a lot of quacks around and many of them
>> >> do a great deal of harm.
>>
>> >You implied that I 'knew best', i.e. it is pointless debating the
>> >issue with me.
>> > If I know best, I know best for myself:
>>
>> That's why I said it.  I wasn't meaning to be rude or derogatory.
>
>Your words are above, June. You said "CP knows best; who are we to
>argue?"
>Those words are very easily construed as rude and/or derogatory, and
>to claim otherwise is disingenuous in the extreme.
>Of course, if you are claiming that this wasn't your intention, who am
>I to doubt you?
>
Whatever you say.  I said it wasn't my intention to be rude or 
derogatory. You are coming over like a schoolteacher telling off a 
naughty child and I don't think that is appropriate.  I shan't reply 
again.
-- 
June Hughes