On Oct 28, 5:07 pm, June Hughes 
wrote:
> In message
> , CP
>  writes
>
>
>
> >On Oct 28, 8:07 am, June Hughes 
> >wrote:
> >> In message
> >> , CP
> >>  writes
>
> >> >On Oct 28, 7:00 am, June Hughes 
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> In message <l5LFm.293691$cf6.45...@newsfe16.iad>, graham
> >> >>  writes
>
> >> >> >"CP"  wrote in message
> >> >> >news:186e3c87-8f3e-4c76-8b49-b61b3d5ea142@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
> >> >> >> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
> >> >> >> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>
> >> >> >> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu vaccine is
> >> >> >> produced.
> >> >> >> What real evidence have you to support your claim?
>
> >> >> >> >Those who are not
> >> >> >> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
> >> >> >> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
> >> >> >> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>
> >> >> >> In your opinion as a medical expert?
>
> >> >> >Here are the opinions of a number of medical experts. And when I say
> >> >> >experts, I'm not talking about the type of practitioners you call
> >> >> >'quacks':
>
> >> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1K74Tnrrok
> >> >> >________________________________________________
>
> >> >> >Same old conspiracy theories and scare tactics about Hg &Al in
> >> >> >the vaccines
> >> >> >causing, inter alia, autism.  Note that Andrew Wakefield was one of the
> >> >> >speakers and he has been thoroughly discredited.  Some of those in this
> >> >> >video are NOT medical experts and one of the physicians ought to have her
> >> >> >arse kicked for some of what she said.
>
> >> >> Yes Graham, but CP knows best.  Who are we to argue?
>
> >> >Did I say that I know best? I was merely sharing the opinions of
> >> >others, and proffering my own. Is there a crime in that?
>
> >> Did I say there was?  There are a lot of quacks around and many of them
> >> do a great deal of harm.
>
> >You implied that I 'knew best', i.e. it is pointless debating the
> >issue with me.
> > If I know best, I know best for myself:
>
> That's why I said it.  I wasn't meaning to be rude or derogatory.

Your words are above, June. You said "CP knows best; who are we to
argue?"
Those words are very easily construed as rude and/or derogatory, and
to claim otherwise is disingenuous in the extreme.
Of course, if you are claiming that this wasn't your intention, who am
I to doubt you?