In message 
, CP 
 writes
>On Oct 28, 8:07 am, June Hughes 
>wrote:
>> In message
>> , CP
>>  writes
>>
>> >On Oct 28, 7:00 am, June Hughes 
>> >wrote:
>> >> In message <l5LFm.293691$cf6.45...@newsfe16.iad>, graham
>> >>  writes
>>
>> >> >"CP"  wrote in message
>> >> >news:186e3c87-8f3e-4c76-8b49-b61b3d5ea142@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP 
>> >> >>
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
>> >> >> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
>> >> >> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>>
>> >> >> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu vaccine is
>> >> >> produced.
>> >> >> What real evidence have you to support your claim?
>>
>> >> >> >Those who are not
>> >> >> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
>> >> >> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
>> >> >> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>>
>> >> >> In your opinion as a medical expert?
>>
>> >> >Here are the opinions of a number of medical experts. And when I say
>> >> >experts, I'm not talking about the type of practitioners you call
>> >> >'quacks':
>>
>> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1K74Tnrrok
>> >> >________________________________________________
>>
>> >> >Same old conspiracy theories and scare tactics about Hg &Al in 
>> >> >the vaccines
>> >> >causing, inter alia, autism.  Note that Andrew Wakefield was one of the
>> >> >speakers and he has been thoroughly discredited.  Some of those in this
>> >> >video are NOT medical experts and one of the physicians ought to have her
>> >> >arse kicked for some of what she said.
>>
>> >> Yes Graham, but CP knows best.  Who are we to argue?
>>
>> >Did I say that I know best? I was merely sharing the opinions of
>> >others, and proffering my own. Is there a crime in that?
>>
>> Did I say there was?  There are a lot of quacks around and many of them
>> do a great deal of harm.
>
>You implied that I 'knew best', i.e. it is pointless debating the
>issue with me.


> If I know best, I know best for myself:

That's why I said it.  I wasn't meaning to be rude or derogatory.

> I'm not
>advocating anything in particular for others.
>As for there being a lot of quacks around who do a great deal of harm,
>I do not doubt this for one second. All I'm saying is that you can't
>tar everyone with the same brush. There are also many allopathic
>practitioners around who do a great deal of harm.

-- 
June Hughes