Re: H1N1 vaccination (was Prestige Pressure Cooker)
On Oct 28, 8:07 am, June Hughes
wrote:
> In message
> , CP
> writes
>
> >On Oct 28, 7:00 am, June Hughes
> >wrote:
> >> In message <l5LFm.293691$cf6.45...@newsfe16.iad>, graham
> >> writes
>
> >> >"CP" wrote in message
> >> >news:186e3c87-8f3e-4c76-8b49-b61b3d5ea142@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >> >On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
> >> >> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
> >> >> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>
> >> >> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu vaccine is
> >> >> produced.
> >> >> What real evidence have you to support your claim?
>
> >> >> >Those who are not
> >> >> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
> >> >> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
> >> >> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>
> >> >> In your opinion as a medical expert?
>
> >> >Here are the opinions of a number of medical experts. And when I say
> >> >experts, I'm not talking about the type of practitioners you call
> >> >'quacks':
>
> >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1K74Tnrrok
> >> >________________________________________________
>
> >> >Same old conspiracy theories and scare tactics about Hg &Al in the vaccines
> >> >causing, inter alia, autism. Note that Andrew Wakefield was one of the
> >> >speakers and he has been thoroughly discredited. Some of those in this
> >> >video are NOT medical experts and one of the physicians ought to have her
> >> >arse kicked for some of what she said.
>
> >> Yes Graham, but CP knows best. Who are we to argue?
>
> >Did I say that I know best? I was merely sharing the opinions of
> >others, and proffering my own. Is there a crime in that?
>
> Did I say there was? There are a lot of quacks around and many of them
> do a great deal of harm.
You implied that I 'knew best', i.e. it is pointless debating the
issue with me. If I know best, I know best for myself: I'm not
advocating anything in particular for others.
As for there being a lot of quacks around who do a great deal of harm,
I do not doubt this for one second. All I'm saying is that you can't
tar everyone with the same brush. There are also many allopathic
practitioners around who do a great deal of harm.
date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
author: CP
|