On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP  wrote:
>
> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>
> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu vaccine is produced.
> What real evidence have you to support your claim?
>
> >Those who are not
> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>
> In your opinion as a medical expert?

Here are the opinions of a number of medical experts. And when I say
experts, I'm not talking about the type of practitioners you call
'quacks':

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1K74Tnrrok

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:01:01 +0100, "Tim C."  wrote:

>On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:07:54 +0000, June Hughes wrote in post :
><news:tz9FZhIqpH6KFwVU@theacct.demon.co.uk> :
>
>>> If I know best, I know best for myself:
>> 
>> That's why I said it.  I wasn't meaning to be rude or derogatory.
>
>That's not what it sounded like to me.  :-(

You heard the cat being kicked not the stamp of an angry foot.
-- 

Martin

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:19:24 +0000, June Hughes 
wrote:

>In message , Tim C. 
> writes
>>On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:07:54 +0000, June Hughes wrote in post :
>><news:tz9FZhIqpH6KFwVU@theacct.demon.co.uk> :
>>
>>>> If I know best, I know best for myself:
>>>
>>> That's why I said it.  I wasn't meaning to be rude or derogatory.
>>
>>That's not what it sounded like to me.  :-(
>
>I have already admitted that it came out the wrong way.  What do you 
>want?  I certainly don't intend to grovel for ever.

How about a quick grovel just for today?
-- 

Martin