On Oct 27, 9:44 pm, Martin <m...@address.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT), CP  wrote:
>
> >With regard to the swine flu epidemic, whether it is engineered or
> >'real', the fact remains that the vaccine has been rushed through,
> >with little or no thought for longterm consequences.
>
> It was produced with the same procedures as the annual flu vaccine is produced.
> What real evidence have you to support your claim?

There is plenty of evidence to show that the longterm consequences of
the vaccine are unknown. Surely the speed at which it has appeared
should tell us this much, at least!


> >Those who are not
> >in high risk categories should think really long and hard before
> >succumbing to what will inevitably be tremendous institutional
> >pressure to get vaccinated. In my opinion,
>
> In your opinion as a medical expert?

No, but it echoes the opinion of several medical experts whom I know
personally - and whom I trust. And yes, they *are* 'mainstream'
experts.



> >they would be better off
> >taking large daily doses of Vitamin D - the one thing which most of us
> >at certain latitudes lack, and the absence of which is always
> >conducive to the development of colds and flu in the winter months.
>
> Most of us on a normal diet need neither vitamin supplements nor quack medicine.

Well I eat a very 'normal' (i.e. healthy) diet, but was shocked to
find out last year that I am deficient in Vitamin D - despite my three
helpings of oily fish a week. If one lives above a certain latitude
and is not exposed to sunlight for at least twenty minutes a day,
Vitamin D deficiency is almost inevitable. The evidence for this is
considerable. And yes, I have the opinion of medical experts to back
me on this particular issue, including my own consultant
endocrinologist.