"Theft"
The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are being
filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I checked one
of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section, including Ophelia
et al.
Here they be:
www.mombu.com
www.a1foodforum.com **
Just thought you ought to know.
Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:45:01 GMT
author: Graham
|
Re: "Theft"
Graham wrote:
> The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are
> being filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I
> checked one of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section,
> including Ophelia et al.
> Here they be:
> www.mombu.com
I don't know what that is:(
> www.a1foodforum.com **
I saw a post I made to rec.food.cooking so maybe it was cross posted:(
Thanks Graham, these are new to me.
> Just thought you ought to know.
> Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:39:25 +0100
author: Ophelia Ophelia@nix,co.uk
|
Re: "Theft"
"Ophelia" <Ophelia@nix,co.uk> wrote in message
news:g6d6n6$r44$3@registered.motzarella.org...
> Graham wrote:
>> The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are
>> being filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I
>> checked one of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section,
>> including Ophelia et al.
>> Here they be:
>> www.mombu.com
>
> I don't know what that is:(
>
>> www.a1foodforum.com **
>
> I saw a post I made to rec.food.cooking so maybe it was cross posted:(
>
I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
"bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:10:36 GMT
author: Graham
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
from "Graham" contains these words:
> I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
The usual source raided by post-lifters, is google's archive. The usual
reason is financial ("populating" a ghost website so they can sell
advertising banner space; or selling material to magazines).
Janet.
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:32:38 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
Janet Baraclough wrote:
> The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> from "Graham" contains these words:
>
> > I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
> > "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
>
> What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
I thought it was because you often PWP! :)
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:45:22 +0100
author: (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*))
|
Re: "Theft"
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
news:3130303039303239488A467684@zetnet.co.uk...
> The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> from "Graham" contains these words:
>
>> I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
>> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
>
> What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
>
Does that facility come only with certain newsreaders?
Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:47:50 GMT
author: Graham
|
Re: "Theft"
In message <g6d6n6$r44$3@registered.motzarella.org>, Ophelia
<Ophelia@nix.?.uk.invalid> writes
>Graham wrote:
>> The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are
>> being filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I
>> checked one of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section,
>> including Ophelia et al.
>> Here they be:
>> www.mombu.com
>
>I don't know what that is:(
>
>> www.a1foodforum.com **
>
>I saw a post I made to rec.food.cooking so maybe it was cross posted:(
>
>Thanks Graham, these are new to me.
>
>
>> Just thought you ought to know.
>> Graham
>
>
I just looked at the second website you quoted and my software gave a
warning that this may be a phishing website. Very strange.
--
June Hughes
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:11:04 +0100
author: June Hughes
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <WZqik.30613$nD.13199@pd7urf1no>
from "Graham" contains these words:
> "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
> news:3130303039303239488A467684@zetnet.co.uk...
> > The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> > from "Graham" contains these words:
> >
> >> I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
> >> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
> >
> > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
> >
> Does that facility come only with certain newsreaders?
> Graham
The automated facility I have only comes with certain newsreaders, but
for those without, there's nothing to stop people typing it in by hand.
Janet
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:20:26 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <1iknlqu.ttdf9r1xo28snN%d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk>
from d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) contains
these words:
> Janet Baraclough wrote:
> > The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> > from "Graham" contains these words:
> >
> > > I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be
> > > using a
> > > "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
> >
> > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
> I thought it was because you often PWP! :)
I don't know what PWP means.
Janet
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:20:19 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
Janet Baraclough wrote:
> The message <1iknlqu.ttdf9r1xo28snN%d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk>
> from d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) contains
> these words:
>
> > Janet Baraclough wrote:
>
> > > The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> > > from "Graham" contains these words:
> > >
> > > > I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be
> > > > using a
> > > > "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
> > >
> > > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
>
> > I thought it was because you often PWP! :)
>
> I don't know what PWP means.
Post while... :)
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:31:34 +0100
author: (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*))
|
Re: "Theft"
"June Hughes" wrote in message
news:85$EYjGoFkiIFwvH@theacct.demon.co.uk...
> In message <g6d6n6$r44$3@registered.motzarella.org>, Ophelia
> <Ophelia@nix.?.uk.invalid> writes
>>Graham wrote:
>>> The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are
>>> being filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I
>>> checked one of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section,
>>> including Ophelia et al.
>>> Here they be:
>>> www.mombu.com
>>
>>I don't know what that is:(
>>
>>> www.a1foodforum.com **
>>
>>I saw a post I made to rec.food.cooking so maybe it was cross posted:(
>>
>>Thanks Graham, these are new to me.
>>
>>
>>> Just thought you ought to know.
>>> Graham
>>
>>
> I just looked at the second website you quoted and my software gave a
> warning that this may be a phishing website. Very strange.
> --
YIKES!!
Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:45:47 GMT
author: Graham
|
Re: "Theft"
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
news:3130303039303239488A51AA67@zetnet.co.uk...
> The message <WZqik.30613$nD.13199@pd7urf1no>
> from "Graham" contains these words:
>
>
>> "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
>> news:3130303039303239488A467684@zetnet.co.uk...
>> > The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
>> > from "Graham" contains these words:
>> >
>> >> I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be
>> >> using a
>> >> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
>> >
>> > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
>> >
>> Does that facility come only with certain newsreaders?
>> Graham
>
> The automated facility I have only comes with certain newsreaders, but
> for those without, there's nothing to stop people typing it in by hand.
>
> Janet
Where. please?
Graham
date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:17:33 GMT
author: Graham
|
Re: "Theft"
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:45:01 GMT, "Graham" wrote:
>The folks on AFwine are concerned that their tasting-note posts are being
>filched and appearing in other forums under different names. I checked one
>of them (**) and saw familiar names in the food section, including Ophelia
>et al.
>Here they be:
> www.mombu.com
>www.a1foodforum.com **
>
>Just thought you ought to know.
>Graham
Hardly theft!
You posted your messages to the public domain so they can be used as
seen fit.
And x-no-archive is only used by people to cover their tracks.
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:03:00 +0100
author: Nettie
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <1isik.30681$nD.72@pd7urf1no>
from "Graham" contains these words:
> "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
> news:3130303039303239488A51AA67@zetnet.co.uk...
> > The message <WZqik.30613$nD.13199@pd7urf1no>
> > from "Graham" contains these words:
> >
> >
> >> "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
> >> news:3130303039303239488A467684@zetnet.co.uk...
> >> > The message <0rqik.134691$gc5.14439@pd7urf2no>
> >> > from "Graham" contains these words:
> >> >
> >> >> I don't think they are cross-posted. I think the website must be
> >> >> using a
> >> >> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
> >> >
> >> > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
> >> >
> >> Does that facility come only with certain newsreaders?
> >> Graham
> >
> > The automated facility I have only comes with certain newsreaders, but
> > for those without, there's nothing to stop people typing it in by hand.
> >
> > Janet
> Where. please?
AFAIK, at the top of your post. Try it and see if it works ( if it
does, google's archive will attach a message to your post saying it will
appear for 7 days then be deleted).
Janet
Janet.
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:29:03 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
Following up to June Hughes
> I just looked at the second website you quoted and my software gave a
> warning that this may be a phishing website. Very strange.
norton didnt say anything. I think they are just trying to get forums off
the ground by populating them with stolen usenet posts.
--
Mike:::::::::
remove clothing to email
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:42:45 +0100
author: Mike.....
|
Re: "Theft"
Following up to Janet Baraclough
> AFAIK, at the top of your post. Try it and see if it works
you can do it in 40tude but its best to read the 40tude wiki as its much
quicker than guesswork, which i tried first.
--
Mike:::::::::
remove clothing to email
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:28 +0100
author: Mike.....
|
Re: "Theft"
Following up to Ophelia
> I saw a post I made to rec.food.cooking so maybe it was cross posted:(
i think you find these are web based forums and a bot is copying our posts
across to them, either from here or rec.food.cooking
--
Mike........
remove clothing to email
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:32:31 +0100
author: Mike.....
|
Re: "Theft"
Following up to Graham
> are cross-posted. I think the website must be using a
> "bot" to extract stuff from usenet.
ah soory, you already said wot i said.
--
Mike........
remove clothing to email
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:32:56 +0100
author: Mike.....
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <1iknnw3.qj0elx1qvkqyiN%d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk>
from d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) contains
these words:
> Janet Baraclough wrote:
> > > > What you're describing, is the reason many of us use x-no-archive.
> >
> > > I thought it was because you often PWP! :)
> >
> > I don't know what PWP means.
> Post while... :)
Sounds like you've been misled by someone's fake accounts. You're not
alone.
Janet
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:51:54 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
The message <11zqj9raz228v$.1hkwjg8j7xsk7$.dlg@40tude.net>
from "Mike....." contains these words:
**> X-no-archive: yes
> Xref: master.news.zetnet.net uk.food+drink.misc:208217
> Following up to Mike.....
> > test
There you go, **it's showing in your post header now.
Janet.
date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:41:50 +0100
author: Janet Baraclough
|
Re: "Theft"
Following up to Janet Baraclough
> There you go, **it's showing in your post header now.
i used this new technique, when all else failed, I looked in the
documentation.
--
Mike........
remove clothing to email
date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:47:40 +0100
author: Mike.....
|