|
|
|
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:49:08 +0200,
group: uk.current-events.terrorism
back
Demise of the Dollar
I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one -
"The Dollar! Told you so!" Today's Independent has an article and a
Leader discussing the demise of the dollar. You can find it here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html
or
here::
Exclusive report by Robert Fisk
The demise of the dollar
In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have
launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the
US currency for oil trading
By Robert Fisk
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would
henceforth be held in euros rather
In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history,
Gulf Arabs are planning â along with China, Russia, Japan and France â
to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of
currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold
and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf
Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and
Qatar.
Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central
bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the
scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.
The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese
banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in
gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar
markets within nine years.
The Americans, who are aware the meetings have taken place â although
they have not discovered the details â are sure to fight this
international cabal which will include hitherto loyal allies Japan and
the Gulf Arabs. Against the background to these currency meetings, Sun
Bigan, China's former special envoy to the Middle East, has warned
there is a risk of deepening divisions between China and the US over
influence and oil in the Middle East. "Bilateral quarrels and clashes
are unavoidable," he told the Asia and Africa Review. "We cannot lower
vigilance against hostility in the Middle East over energy interests
and security."
This sounds like a dangerous prediction of a future economic war
between the US and China over Middle East oil â yet again turning the
region's conflicts into a battle for great power supremacy. China uses
more oil incrementally than the US because its growth is less energy
efficient. The transitional currency in the move away from dollars,
according to Chinese banking sources, may well be gold. An indication
of the huge amounts involved can be gained from the wealth of Abu
Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar who together hold an estimated
$2.1 trillion in dollar reserves.
The decline of American economic power linked to the current global
recession was implicitly acknowledged by the World Bank president
Robert Zoellick. "One of the legacies of this crisis may be a
recognition of changed economic power relations," he said in Istanbul
ahead of meetings this week of the IMF and World Bank. But it is
China's extraordinary new financial power â along with past anger among
oil-producing and oil-consuming nations at America's power to interfere
in the international financial system â which has prompted the latest
discussions involving the Gulf states.
Brazil has shown interest in collaborating in non-dollar oil payments,
along with India. Indeed, China appears to be the most enthusiastic of
all the financial powers involved, not least because of its enormous
trade with the Middle East.
China imports 60 per cent of its oil, much of it from the Middle East
and Russia. The Chinese have oil production concessions in Iraq â
blocked by the US until this year â and since 2008 have held an $8bn
agreement with Iran to develop refining capacity and gas resources.
China has oil deals in Sudan (where it has substituted for US
interests) and has been negotiating for oil concessions with Libya,
where all such contracts are joint ventures.
Furthermore, Chinese exports to the region now account for no fewer
than 10 per cent of the imports of every country in the Middle East,
including a huge range of products from cars to weapon systems, food,
clothes, even dolls. In a clear sign of China's growing financial
muscle, the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude
Trichet, yesterday pleaded with Beijing to let the yuan appreciate
against a sliding dollar and, by extension, loosen China's reliance on
US monetary policy, to help rebalance the world economy and ease upward
pressure on the euro.
Ever since the Bretton Woods agreements â the accords after the Second
World War which bequeathed the architecture for the modern
international financial system â America's trading partners have been
left to cope with the impact of Washington's control and, in more
recent years, the hegemony of the dollar as the dominant global reserve
currency.
The Chinese believe, for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain
to stay out of the euro in order to prevent an earlier move away from
the dollar. But Chinese banking sources say their discussions have gone
too far to be blocked now. "The Russians will eventually bring in the
rouble to the basket of currencies," a prominent Hong Kong broker told
The Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle and will come into
the euro. They have no choice because they won't be able to use the US
dollar."
Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy
fixing the US economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications
of the transition from the dollar in nine years' time. The current
deadline for the currency transition is 2018.
The US discussed the trend briefly at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh; the
Chinese Central Bank governor and other officials have been worrying
aloud about the dollar for years. Their problem is that much of their
national wealth is tied up in dollar assets.
"These plans will change the face of international financial
transactions," one Chinese banker said. "America and Britain must be
very worried. You will know how worried by the thunder of denials this
news will generate."
Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would
henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of
course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its
oil in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein
trumpeted his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:49:08 +0200
author: Krak
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
"Krak" wrote in message
news:hae0lk$5kn$00$1@news.t-online.com...
>I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one - "The
>Dollar! Told you so!" Today's Independent has an article and a Leader
>discussing the demise of the dollar. You can find it here:
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html
>
> or
> here::
>
>
> Exclusive report by Robert Fisk
> The demise of the dollar
> In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have
> launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the US
> currency for oil trading
> By Robert Fisk
> Tuesday, 6 October 2009
> Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would
> henceforth be held in euros rather
> In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf
> Arabs are planning - along with China, Russia, Japan and France - to end
> dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies
> including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new,
> unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council,
> including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.
> Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central
> bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme,
> which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.
> The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese
> banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold
> prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets
> within nine years.
> The Americans, who are aware the meetings have taken place - although they
> have not discovered the details - are sure to fight this international
> cabal which will include hitherto loyal allies Japan and the Gulf Arabs.
> Against the background to these currency meetings, Sun Bigan, China's
> former special envoy to the Middle East, has warned there is a risk of
> deepening divisions between China and the US over influence and oil in the
> Middle East. "Bilateral quarrels and clashes are unavoidable," he told the
> Asia and Africa Review. "We cannot lower vigilance against hostility in
> the Middle East over energy interests and security."
> This sounds like a dangerous prediction of a future economic war between
> the US and China over Middle East oil - yet again turning the region's
> conflicts into a battle for great power supremacy. China uses more oil
> incrementally than the US because its growth is less energy efficient. The
> transitional currency in the move away from dollars, according to Chinese
> banking sources, may well be gold. An indication of the huge amounts
> involved can be gained from the wealth of Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait
> and Qatar who together hold an estimated $2.1 trillion in dollar reserves.
> The decline of American economic power linked to the current global
> recession was implicitly acknowledged by the World Bank president Robert
> Zoellick. "One of the legacies of this crisis may be a recognition of
> changed economic power relations," he said in Istanbul ahead of meetings
> this week of the IMF and World Bank. But it is China's extraordinary new
> financial power - along with past anger among oil-producing and
> oil-consuming nations at America's power to interfere in the international
> financial system - which has prompted the latest discussions involving the
> Gulf states.
> Brazil has shown interest in collaborating in non-dollar oil payments,
> along with India. Indeed, China appears to be the most enthusiastic of all
> the financial powers involved, not least because of its enormous trade
> with the Middle East.
> China imports 60 per cent of its oil, much of it from the Middle East and
> Russia. The Chinese have oil production concessions in Iraq - blocked by
> the US until this year - and since 2008 have held an $8bn agreement with
> Iran to develop refining capacity and gas resources. China has oil deals
> in Sudan (where it has substituted for US interests) and has been
> negotiating for oil concessions with Libya, where all such contracts are
> joint ventures.
> Furthermore, Chinese exports to the region now account for no fewer than
> 10 per cent of the imports of every country in the Middle East, including
> a huge range of products from cars to weapon systems, food, clothes, even
> dolls. In a clear sign of China's growing financial muscle, the president
> of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, yesterday pleaded with
> Beijing to let the yuan appreciate against a sliding dollar and, by
> extension, loosen China's reliance on US monetary policy, to help
> rebalance the world economy and ease upward pressure on the euro.
> Ever since the Bretton Woods agreements - the accords after the Second
> World War which bequeathed the architecture for the modern international
> financial system - America's trading partners have been left to cope with
> the impact of Washington's control and, in more recent years, the hegemony
> of the dollar as the dominant global reserve currency.
> The Chinese believe, for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to
> stay out of the euro in order to prevent an earlier move away from the
> dollar. But Chinese banking sources say their discussions have gone too
> far to be blocked now. "The Russians will eventually bring in the rouble
> to the basket of currencies," a prominent Hong Kong broker told The
> Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle and will come into the
> euro. They have no choice because they won't be able to use the US
> dollar."
> Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy
> fixing the US economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications of
> the transition from the dollar in nine years' time. The current deadline
> for the currency transition is 2018.
> The US discussed the trend briefly at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh; the
> Chinese Central Bank governor and other officials have been worrying aloud
> about the dollar for years. Their problem is that much of their national
> wealth is tied up in dollar assets.
> "These plans will change the face of international financial
> transactions," one Chinese banker said. "America and Britain must be very
> worried. You will know how worried by the thunder of denials this news
> will generate."
> Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would
> henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of
> course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil
> in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein trumpeted
> his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq.
>
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html
>
So you'll have to buy their money in order to buy their oil? Why didn't
they do that years ago?
I don't know... what are they going to fight over when all the oil is
gone?......
TWP
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:14:37 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
"Krak" wrote ...
>I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one - "The
>Dollar! Told you so!"
It has been on the cards for a long time and the world is changing. The
dollar only really gained its supremacy in the wake of WW2 and the merit for
that is at best dubious.
Many of the things which people believed, even held as self-evident and
unchangeable - "You cannot beat the American military machine", "the dollar
is the de-facto currency", "America is the number one super-power and global
influence" - are being re-assessed. America herself has played a large part
in bringing that re-assessment about.
While change has been perceptible for decades, it has dramatically hastened
in the last decade, and notably amongst those which America 'doesn't see eye
to eye with'; the Middle East, Latin America, China, Russia, and 'Europe'.
In many ways the geopolitical world can now be seen as "America" and "The
Rest" with a few pledging allegiance to one side or the other, or simply
standing back to see which way the wind blows.
American 'dominance' seems all but over, and that may turn out to be GWB's
greatest legacy. From announcing his "Crusade" against the Middle East, his
demonisation of "Old Europe" - Germany and France in particular - ignoring
and opposing the UN collective, and failing to recognise emergent economies
and powers, America has made herself somewhat isolated while the rest of the
world has simply moved on by itself.
Just as Britain is in a no-man's land - not fully committing to 'Europe',
clutching on to the thin thread of 'the special relationship' with America -
America is going to find herself more outside than in if she doesn't change
and embrace the emerging new world order. Like Britain, America has to
accept that domination is good while it lasts but has to accept it cannot
last for ever. Empires rise and empires fall and it seems we are now moving
into something more akin to a global collective. It would be interesting to
know how it pans-out in a hundred or so years.
date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:02:54 GMT
author: The Happy Hippy
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
On 2009-10-06 21:02:54 +0200, "The Happy Hippy"
said:
> "Krak" wrote ...
>
>> I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one - "The
>> Dollar! Told you so!"
>
> It has been on the cards for a long time and the world is changing. The
> dollar only really gained its supremacy in the wake of WW2 and the merit for
> that is at best dubious.
>
> Many of the things which people believed, even held as self-evident and
> unchangeable - "You cannot beat the American military machine", "the dollar
> is the de-facto currency", "America is the number one super-power and global
> influence" - are being re-assessed. America herself has played a large part
> in bringing that re-assessment about.
>
> While change has been perceptible for decades, it has dramatically hastened
> in the last decade, and notably amongst those which America 'doesn't see eye
> to eye with'; the Middle East, Latin America, China, Russia, and 'Europe'.
> In many ways the geopolitical world can now be seen as "America" and "The
> Rest" with a few pledging allegiance to one side or the other, or simply
> standing back to see which way the wind blows.
>
> American 'dominance' seems all but over, and that may turn out to be GWB's
> greatest legacy. From announcing his "Crusade" against the Middle East, his
> demonisation of "Old Europe" - Germany and France in particular - ignoring
> and opposing the UN collective, and failing to recognise emergent economies
> and powers, America has made herself somewhat isolated while the rest of the
> world has simply moved on by itself.
>
> Just as Britain is in a no-man's land - not fully committing to 'Europe',
> clutching on to the thin thread of 'the special relationship' with America -
> America is going to find herself more outside than in if she doesn't change
> and embrace the emerging new world order. Like Britain, America has to
> accept that domination is good while it lasts but has to accept it cannot
> last for ever. Empires rise and empires fall and it seems we are now moving
> into something more akin to a global collective. It would be interesting to
> know how it pans-out in a hundred or so years.
I think that you are in general correct, although I would set the time
scale significantly lower.
A quote that I found particularly interesting was, "The Chinese
believe, for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to stay out
of the euro in order to prevent an earlier move away from the dollar".
And all the time the Brits thought they stayed out because they wanted
to stay out.
And you, TWP, no doubt were startled to hear that, âa prominent Hong
Kong broker told The Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle
and will come into the euro. They have no choice because they won't be
able to use the US dollar."
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:25:22 +0200
author: Krak
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
"Krak" wrote ...
[snip]
> A quote that I found particularly interesting was, "The Chinese believe,
> for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to stay out of the euro
> in order to prevent an earlier move away from the dollar". And all the
> time the Brits thought they stayed out because they wanted to stay out.
That Britain may have obliged I can accept though don't know how true it is;
it has been said that Iraq's planned move into the petro-Euro was the final
straw regarding Saddam, and Iran was reportedly being threatened for its
adoption of the Euro.
I think Brits are about equally split on the issue. If they'd called it "a
pound" and stuck HM Queen's head on it, we'd have adopted the Euro years ago
:-)
> And you, TWP, no doubt were startled to hear that, "a prominent Hong Kong
> broker told The Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle and will
> come into the euro. They have no choice because they won't be able to use
> the US dollar."
As we buy US Dollars, we can buy Euros, or Yuan. Doesn't mean we have to
adopt that currency as our own ;-)
date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:36:55 GMT
author: The Happy Hippy
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
"Krak" wrote ...
>I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one - "The
>Dollar! Told you so!"
A related thing is that there has been, since mid-2008, and still is, talk
of the dollar being officially devalued within the next twelve months or so.
China has notably been divesting itself of US dollars over quite a time,
seemingly slowly enough not to cause many major ripples.
date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:44:36 GMT
author: The Happy Hippy
|
Re: Demise of the Dollar
"Krak" wrote in message
news:hag93i$chl$03$1@news.t-online.com...
> On 2009-10-06 21:02:54 +0200, "The Happy Hippy"
> said:
>
>> "Krak" wrote ...
>>
>>> I am currently knitting a new T-Shirt for Chris. You know the one - "The
>>> Dollar! Told you so!"
>>
>> It has been on the cards for a long time and the world is changing. The
>> dollar only really gained its supremacy in the wake of WW2 and the merit
>> for
>> that is at best dubious.
>>
>> Many of the things which people believed, even held as self-evident and
>> unchangeable - "You cannot beat the American military machine", "the
>> dollar
>> is the de-facto currency", "America is the number one super-power and
>> global
>> influence" - are being re-assessed. America herself has played a large
>> part
>> in bringing that re-assessment about.
>>
>> While change has been perceptible for decades, it has dramatically
>> hastened
>> in the last decade, and notably amongst those which America 'doesn't see
>> eye
>> to eye with'; the Middle East, Latin America, China, Russia, and
>> 'Europe'.
>> In many ways the geopolitical world can now be seen as "America" and "The
>> Rest" with a few pledging allegiance to one side or the other, or simply
>> standing back to see which way the wind blows.
>>
>> American 'dominance' seems all but over, and that may turn out to be
>> GWB's
>> greatest legacy. From announcing his "Crusade" against the Middle East,
>> his
>> demonisation of "Old Europe" - Germany and France in particular -
>> ignoring
>> and opposing the UN collective, and failing to recognise emergent
>> economies
>> and powers, America has made herself somewhat isolated while the rest of
>> the
>> world has simply moved on by itself.
>>
>> Just as Britain is in a no-man's land - not fully committing to 'Europe',
>> clutching on to the thin thread of 'the special relationship' with
>> America -
>> America is going to find herself more outside than in if she doesn't
>> change
>> and embrace the emerging new world order. Like Britain, America has to
>> accept that domination is good while it lasts but has to accept it cannot
>> last for ever. Empires rise and empires fall and it seems we are now
>> moving
>> into something more akin to a global collective. It would be interesting
>> to
>> know how it pans-out in a hundred or so years.
>
> I think that you are in general correct, although I would set the time
> scale significantly lower.
>
> A quote that I found particularly interesting was, "The Chinese believe,
> for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to stay out of the euro
> in order to prevent an earlier move away from the dollar". And all the
> time the Brits thought they stayed out because they wanted to stay out.
>
> And you, TWP, no doubt were startled to hear that, "a prominent Hong Kong
> broker told The Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle and will
> come into the euro. They have no choice because they won't be able to use
> the US dollar."
>
They may be right. I think they'd have to make a very compelling case to us
though. I think we're suspicious of Europe at best. I suppose we still
have a race memory of some of them dropping bombs on our heads! I think we
also find it hard to believe that we won't be the losers out of the deal.
Will forming currency collectives really offer protection though? It
doesn't seem to have helped the US, and they're effectively pooling the
resources of 50 seperate nations.
Another thought occurs - and please forget I mentioned it if my insanity is
showing here - but if the US ceases to be an umbrella currency for oil
trading, won't that make the US vulnerable to sanctions being imposed on it
by the oil nations? I suppose we've already had oil sanctins in the 1970's,
but there would surely be even greater leverage available if the currencies
were seperate from the oil - so that the value of oil didn't sink with the
ship - to actually attack the US through the use of any new oil currency?
Yet another thought occurs - if the oil-producing nations invent their own
currency for oil, is it going to last? Won't it be like backing their
currency up with gold that is gradually being burned in people's cars?
Wouldn't they have to be producers of other major commodities to keep the
currency going?
I'm not an expert in economic things, it's just I've got a strange feeling
in my water about all this!... I think I'll start stocking up on bottled
water and tinned food just to be on the safe side... I can't help but feel
that trouble's a-brewin...
TWP
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:20:40 +0100
author: TWP
|
|
|