While some say the Daily Mail never had any credibility, you know it's bad
when Fox News complains of being plagiarised ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,428544,00.html

They report. You decide. When it comes to Daily Mail credibility I believe
most Brits already had.

"The Happy Hippy"  wrote in message 
news:jrsDk.63550$E41.49433@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> While some say the Daily Mail never had any credibility, you know it's bad
> when Fox News complains of being plagiarised ...
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,428544,00.html
>
> They report. You decide. When it comes to Daily Mail credibility I believe
> most Brits already had.
>
>
>

There's probably been stuff that has been talked about here that has been 
echoed in the media later.... maybe we should all get lawyers.

TWP

"TWP"  wrote ...

> "The Happy Hippy"  wrote in message
> news:jrsDk.63550$E41.49433@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > While some say the Daily Mail never had any credibility, you know it's
bad
> > when Fox News complains of being plagiarised ...
> >
> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,428544,00.html
> >
> > They report. You decide. When it comes to Daily Mail credibility I
believe
> > most Brits already had.
> >
> >
> >
>
> There's probably been stuff that has been talked about here that has been
> echoed in the media later....

I don't think there's any "probably" about it. While we are not the only
group which puts its slant on terrorism and associated events ( and other
wider topics ) I've noticed some remarkable echoing of particular comments
in the press. Not numerous but they have been there. Maybe just coincidence,
if not, it's great to know there are others out there holding the same views
independently.

One of the reasons I've never worried about being being a lone voice,
drowned out by the propagandists or any apparent lack of wide audience; you
never do know who your views are getting out to, who the full readership is,
and who you may be influencing.

<waves> at GCHQ </waves>


> maybe we should all get lawyers.

Or ask for a weekly column :-)

"The Happy Hippy"  wrote in message 
news:hQADk.63685$E41.6421@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> "TWP"  wrote ...
>
>> "The Happy Hippy"  wrote in message
>> news:jrsDk.63550$E41.49433@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> > While some say the Daily Mail never had any credibility, you know it's
> bad
>> > when Fox News complains of being plagiarised ...
>> >
>> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,428544,00.html
>> >
>> > They report. You decide. When it comes to Daily Mail credibility I
> believe
>> > most Brits already had.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> There's probably been stuff that has been talked about here that has been
>> echoed in the media later....
>
> I don't think there's any "probably" about it.

Well, I'm also fairly certain it's true, but I say "probably" because I 
don't want to go through the ordeal of trying to be certain!


> <waves> at GCHQ </waves>

I'm sure they got the message via Echelon! :-)  Not that it exists of 
course.


TWP