This is no way to fight terror

A postgraduate student researching al-Qaida, I was locked up alone for six
days, then released without charge or apology

Rizwaan Sabir 
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday September 16 2008 14:30 BST 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/16/uksecurity.terrorism

For millions of people in the UK, anti-terror legislation is rather distant,
its finer points discussed only by politicians, specialist lawyers and the
like. We hear about attempts to introduce tough laws; we hear about new
arrests, and we get on with our lives. But for my friend Hicham and me, the
force of the new anti-terror legislation suddenly became a harsh reality.
Our arrests have implications for the rights of individuals in Britain to
read legally available open-source documents free from the fear of arrest. 

May 14 2008. A postgraduate international relations student at the
University of Nottingham and a principle administrator in the modern
languages department (also a former postgraduate student at the
university), Rizwaan Sabir and Hicham Yezza, were arrested under section 41
of the Terrorism Act 2000. I type this sentence, and despite everything, I
still find it difficult to comprehend the arrests. We were detained for six
days, unable to see our family or friends on suspicion of being involved in
the "commission, preparation, or instigation" of an act of terrorism. Our
homes were raided and my terrified family evicted from their home. 

The operation, codenamed Minerva, was led by the West Midlands
counter-terrorism unit and involved 26 police officers, forensic experts,
three police raids, and thousands of pounds of hard-earned taxpayers'
money. 

After failing to find justification to detain me any longer, on day six of
our ordeal, I was released without a charge, without an apology; but with a
police warning against accessing an openly available, widely cited al-Qaida
document considered relevant to my postgraduate research by me and my
academic supervisors. I was only put under threat of future arrest, but
Hicham's terrifying detention was prolonged by the authorities, under
immigration charges – his ordeal continues to this very day. 

What was our offence?

Our offence was that we had in our possession an edited version of a
document referred to as the "al-Qaida training manual". A document freely
available on the US Department of Justice website and that of the
Federation of American Scientists. A document widely available elsewhere on
official and unofficial internet sites, in either edited or full versions.
A document purchasable in paperback from Amazon. A document I had
downloaded months ago for my masters dissertation and upcoming PhD. A
document a lecturer knew I was consulting. A document I had sent months ago
to Hicham who was helping me draft my PhD proposal. A document many other
academics and students studying terrorism will have had in their
possession. A document extensively cited in books on terrorism. A
bog-standard source. Nothing extraordinary or remarkable about its
possession – one would think. 

Once placed under arrest in the car park of the University's Trent building,
I naively thought I would be released in a few hours, that it was all a
terrible misunderstanding or a sick joke. 

We were taken to Bridewell police station (a small specialised prison
complex consisting of approximately 90 cells) and placed in a cell. I was
informed that a warrant would soon be issued and my house would be raided.
I had still not been told the reason for my arrest. 

For the suspected "terrorists" (Hicham and me), they had sealed off the
entire second floor of the prison. We were kept in solitary confinement.
Our only human contact – apart from the detention officers and my lawyer –
was with a judge that smiled down on us whilst stamping an authorisation
order for a further five days detention. 

For the first 12 hours I was incommunicado. For the first 2 days I was on a
24-hour watch. Two officers sat outside my open cell door, watching my
every move and making notes in a custody log. I couldn't sleep. I couldn't
eat. I was too scared to pray, lest that be used against me. My property
was seized, forensically examined, and my family evicted. My car was
compounded and my friends and lecturers repeatedly questioned. I was
photographed, fingerprinted, foot-printed and DNA-swabbed. It was the first
time in my life I had felt so criminalised and degraded.

I was interviewed once a day, except for the last day, when I sat through
two mind-numbing interviews. I was asked my opinion of the training manual,
whether I had used it, or was planning on using it, or whether I had
disseminated it. I was asked if I had ever travelled to Pakistan, Iraq,
Afghanistan or Turkey (obviously the lack of stamps in my passport weren't
enough to convince them), whether I had ever been camping, or was planning
a camping trip. I was questioned about September 11 and asked to explain
what I thought of al-Qaida. The interviews got more absurd with time. I was
questioned about journal articles in my bedroom from Foreign Affairs and
World Politics, photographs I had taken of friends with Edinburgh Castle in
the background, and questioned about cheesy pop CDs from the early 1990s –
embarrassingly – discovered in my bedroom. 

Unfettered questioning and microscopic searches for six days did not produce
any evidence, and I was released without charge. The police had finally
realised I was a postgraduate student studying terrorism; not a member of
an al-Qaida sleeper-cell.

Bill Rammell, the higher education minister, has made it clear, in his
speeches and through his department's guidance to universities, that
academic freedom is important and that it is vital that academics and
students should be able to study terrorism. Nevertheless, in apparent
contravention of the government guidance, the police threatened me with
further detention if I used the document for my research. 

I would like to say my freedom to research had the full backing of my
University authorities, but unfortunately they appear unwilling to uphold
the right of their students to read and study legal, openly available
documents free from the fear of arrest.

My feeling upon release was sheer relief and happiness; the joy of freedom
and the pleasure of seeing my loved ones was something I had never
encountered before. But beneath it all lay terrifying thoughts and
questions; what would have happened if I had been charged? How would I have
coped in a maximum-security prison? The answers to these questions still
haunt me today.

The authorities have a tough job fighting terrorism. But locking away
innocent people without prior investigation (for what may soon be 42 days)
to later release them without charge is certainly not the way. It is not
the way to make Britain safer. It is not the way to bring a multicultural
and multiracial society together. It is not the way to unit British
citizens against terrorism, but it is a way of setting a very worrying
precedent that might achieve just the opposite. 

Detaining people who have actually committed a crime of which there is
evidence is understandable, but detaining those against whom there is no
evidence is not.

-- 
Facts are sacred ... but comment is free