|
|
|
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:43:21 +0100,
group: uk.current-events.terrorism
back
Russia test-launches ballistic missile
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=67828§ionid=351020602
Russia undertook prescision ballistic missiles tests as the country takes
safety precautions against the encroachment of the US missile shield.
Carrying a new warhead reportedly undetectable by any conventional
technology, the Topol RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile pierced the
designated target with 100% accuracy "demonstrating its capability to
deliver pinpoint strikes on well-defended targets," Col. Alexander Vovk was
quoted by Ria Novosti as saying.
............
"Enhanced 'stealth' capability, a variability of flight trajectory and the
use of warheads capable of penetrating any missile shield," is Russia's way
of battening down the hatches in the fastest and most efficient way to
achieve national defense.
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:43:21 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
(This news organisation is based in Iran. Maybe that makes a difference,
maybe it doesn't, but I haven't heard this story anywhere else)
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:06:28 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
TWP wrote:
> (This news organisation is based in Iran. Maybe that makes a difference,
> maybe it doesn't, but I haven't heard this story anywhere else)
AFP reported this story from Moscow yesterday, and I saw it on the BBC.
See, e.g.
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Russia_missile_test_heightens_stand-off_with_West_999.html
http://tinyurl.com/6h9yqj
--
Facts are sacred ... but comment is free
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:06:36 GMT
author: Robin T Cox
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
"Robin T Cox" wrote in message
news:0eNtk.49512$E41.15514@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> TWP wrote:
>
>> (This news organisation is based in Iran. Maybe that makes a difference,
>> maybe it doesn't, but I haven't heard this story anywhere else)
>
> AFP reported this story from Moscow yesterday, and I saw it on the BBC.
>
> See, e.g.
> http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Russia_missile_test_heightens_stand-off_with_West_999.html
> http://tinyurl.com/6h9yqj
> --
> Facts are sacred ... but comment is free
Good. I was worried about the story - it sounded a bit iffy.
TWP
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:05:40 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
TWP wrote:
> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=67828§ionid=351020602
>
> Russia undertook prescision ballistic missiles tests as the country takes
> safety precautions against the encroachment of the US missile shield.
>
> Carrying a new warhead reportedly undetectable by any conventional
> technology, the Topol RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile pierced the
> designated target with 100% accuracy "demonstrating its capability to
> deliver pinpoint strikes on well-defended targets," Col. Alexander Vovk was
> quoted by Ria Novosti as saying.
I just launched an even bigger missile, which is undetectable by any
technology at all. Prove I didn't....
--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:02:28 +0100
author: Arthur Figgis lid
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
"Arthur Figgis" <afiggis@example.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:lYCdnWMbush4_iXVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
> TWP wrote:
>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=67828§ionid=351020602
>>
>> Russia undertook prescision ballistic missiles tests as the country takes
>> safety precautions against the encroachment of the US missile shield.
>>
>> Carrying a new warhead reportedly undetectable by any conventional
>> technology, the Topol RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile pierced
>> the designated target with 100% accuracy "demonstrating its capability to
>> deliver pinpoint strikes on well-defended targets," Col. Alexander Vovk
>> was quoted by Ria Novosti as saying.
>
> I just launched an even bigger missile, which is undetectable by any
> technology at all. Prove I didn't....
>
> --
> Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
Yeah?, well I just launched two while on a tightrope under water!
If they can launch undetectable missiles, why are they worried about the
shield?
TWP
Wasn't Topol in "Fiddler on the Roof"?
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:39:53 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
TWP wrote:
> "Arthur Figgis" <afiggis@example.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:lYCdnWMbush4_iXVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>> TWP wrote:
>>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=67828§ionid=351020602
>>>
>>> Russia undertook prescision ballistic missiles tests as the country takes
>>> safety precautions against the encroachment of the US missile shield.
>>>
>>> Carrying a new warhead reportedly undetectable by any conventional
>>> technology, the Topol RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile pierced
>>> the designated target with 100% accuracy "demonstrating its capability to
>>> deliver pinpoint strikes on well-defended targets," Col. Alexander Vovk
>>> was quoted by Ria Novosti as saying.
>> I just launched an even bigger missile, which is undetectable by any
>> technology at all. Prove I didn't....
>>
>> --
>> Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
>
>
> Yeah?, well I just launched two while on a tightrope under water!
>
> If they can launch undetectable missiles, why are they worried about the
> shield?
A bird might not detect a window, but it can't get through it.
(sounds like that should be code for something)
--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:52:15 +0100
author: Arthur Figgis lid
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
"Arthur Figgis" <afiggis@example.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:c7udnVZruaES8iXVRVnyiwA@posted.plusnet...
>> If they can launch undetectable missiles, why are they worried about the
>> shield?
>
> A bird might not detect a window, but it can't get through it.
>
> (sounds like that should be code for something)
I thought you were quoting "Kung Fu".
TWP
Grasshopper
date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:03:26 +0100
author: TWP
|
Re: Russia test-launches ballistic missile
TWP wrote:
>
> "Arthur Figgis" <afiggis@example.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:c7udnVZruaES8iXVRVnyiwA@posted.plusnet...
>
>
>>> If they can launch undetectable missiles, why are they worried about the
>>> shield?
>>
>> A bird might not detect a window, but it can't get through it.
>>
>> (sounds like that should be code for something)
>
> I thought you were quoting "Kung Fu".
>
> TWP
> Grasshopper
Eric Cantona, surely?
--
Facts are sacred ... but comment is free
date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:39:02 GMT
author: Robin T Cox
|
|
|