On 13 Nov, 04:16, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@masceng.ohio-
state.edu> wrote:
> In article ,
>
>  freeireland  wrote:
> > On 13 Nov, 00:35, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@masceng.ohio-
> > state.edu> wrote:
> > > In article ,
>
> > >  freeireland  wrote:
>
> childish drivel snipped
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > No "terms", just facts. You made a statement, reiterated it when
> > > > > challenged, and did not have the common decency to withdraw it when
> > > > > $100
> > > > > was offered. You lose - you are just not man enough to admit it.
> > > > > However, if you give me a way to contact "Marty the solicitor", I can
> > > > > give him everything he needs. Either that, or retract (or simply crawl
> > > > > off into the night).
>
> > > > > William Clark
>
> > > > I have not or ever made any obligation to give you anyones contact
> > > > details on this forum and it certainly was not part of any wager so
> > > > stop hidding behind that excuse and simply show me the terms of the
> > > > wager that show you as winning?
>
> > > I am not "hidding" behind any excuse. You constantly move the goal posts
> > > to try to wriggle out of your blunder.
>
> > > Either give me Marty's web site, or else you have lied about him, too.
>
> > > Yawn.
>
> > > William CLark- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > So when have I told you Marty had a web site? More slur? Your mouth is
> > in gear though your brain is in neutral.
>
> If "Marty" was a solicitor of anything other than the local bar, he
> would have a business connected web site. Apparently he doesn't, ergo I
> propose that he is not, therefore, a "solicitor". Prove me wrong.
>
> More irrelevant garbage snipped.
>
> What has this to do with anything? we are talking about your reiterated
> claim about my academic qualifications. Period. That on
>

Again you made the accusation and the burden of proof is on you. So
prove your wild accusation or retract it.

These wild unsubstanciaed accusations have led you to make claims
which I have proven without doubt. As of yet you have still to retract
and apologise for those slurs.

"There is no URL in existence, and you made the post up just to
denigrate an institution you know absolutely nothing about (and
cannot
even distinguish from Ohio  University). You are, pure and simple, a
bare faced liar. Case proven and closed".


>
>
> > What terms of the wager show you as having you won? Why can't you
> > simply answer this?
>
> Nice try to move the goal posts again. It just doesn't work, I'm afraid.
> So, pay up, or retract.


Your wriggling like a worm on hook, so show what terms of the wager
show you as having you won?

How can I move the goalposts when you cannot even tell me what they
are.

>
> End of story.
>
> William Clark- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -