On 13 Nov, 00:35, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@masceng.ohio-
state.edu> wrote:
> In article ,
>
>  freeireland  wrote:
>
> childish drivel snipped
>

"There is no URL in existence, and you made the post up just to
denigrate an institution you know absolutely nothing about (and
cannot
even distinguish from Ohio  University). You are, pure and simple, a
bare faced liar. Case proven and closed".

I have repeatedly asked you to retract this statement. Reverting to
this type of slur says more about your intelligence than I ever could
and refusing to retract it says more about your integrity than I ever
could.

While your at it you should also retract this as well, clearly I have
also shown the statement to be incorrect.

"'Due to' is really not correct in any context in which it cannot be
replaced by 'caused by'".

>
>
>
>
> > > > > > > Fine, so for the last time - you simply refuse to allow any process
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > will finally reveal the extent of your silly misstatement. I
> > > > > > > understand
> > > > > > > why you use the moniker "Free"ireland - you don't believe in paying
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > anything.
>
> > > > > > Yawn more childish name calling.
>
> > > > > > What terms of the wager show you as having you won?
>
> > > > > The facts. End of story.
>
> > > > Why is it you can't show the terms of the wager showing you as
> > > > winning?
>
> > > No "terms", just facts. You made a statement, reiterated it when
> > > challenged, and did not have the common decency to withdraw it when $100
> > > was offered. You lose - you are just not man enough to admit it.
> > > However, if you give me a way to contact "Marty the solicitor", I can
> > > give him everything he needs. Either that, or retract (or simply crawl
> > > off into the night).
>
> > > William Clark
>
> > I have not or ever made any obligation to give you anyones contact
> > details on this forum and it certainly was not part of any wager so
> > stop hidding behind that excuse and simply show me the terms of the
> > wager that show you as winning?
>
> I am not "hidding" behind any excuse. You constantly move the goal posts
> to try to wriggle out of your blunder.
>
> Either give me Marty's web site, or else you have lied about him, too.
>
> Yawn.
>
> William CLark- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

So when have I told you Marty had a web site? More slur? Your mouth is
in gear though your brain is in neutral.


Also you should retract "And it is 'Welsh Rarebit', not 'Welsh
Rabbit', FYI". When challenged on the matter you then claimed "There -
my turn to catch you! Done - see "Fowler's Modern English Usage"  for
the correct explanation, under "True and False Etymology".

The reality is you didn't catch me at all and clearly used Fowler to
reinforce your incorrect claim. This is dishonesty of the highest
order especially for someone who claims to work in the education
sector. The baiting claim also does not wash as that would mean you
deliberately lied when you made that original claim. Also its not a
very successful bait if the original incorrect claim was simply
corrected. Either way you were deceitful and in no position to call
anyone a liar based on the weak assumptions you make.

What terms of the wager show you as having you won? Why can't you
simply answer this?

You should stick to playing solitaire for cash.