On 9 Nov, 14:24, "William A. T. Clark"  wrote:
> In article ,
>
>
>
>
>
>  freeireland  wrote:
> > On 9 Nov, 01:43, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@masceng.ohio-
> > state.edu> wrote:
> > > In article ,
>
> > >  freeireland  wrote:
>
> > > Oh, so there is a URL after all? Well, good, as I say if you hadn't
> > > refused to follow even the simplest Usenet etiquette, it would not have
> > > been necessary to provoke you into finally revealing this "source" that
> > > does more to disprove the point you were trying to make than to help it.
> > > I am not going to apologize to anyone who lacks even the simplest
> > > inkling of appropriate behavior of this forum.>
>
> > Again complete and utter nonsense you assumed there was no URL and
> > made very clear allegations that have now been proven to be incorrect.
> > Now please retract your slur.
>
> > You have no right to determine what is or what is not proper or
> > inproper usenet etiquette.
>
> I don't determine it - it is the accepted protocol on the unsenet,
> established by others.

What complete nonsense. This is an unmoderated forum and I do not have
to post to any imaginary protocal. Nobody including you or I can tell
me or anyone else what to post here or in what manner.


>
> Now, how about a comment on this?


I have commented on it and will not any longer until you retract your
statement and apologise for making it. How dare you talk about
etiquette when posting such defamation without retracting and
apologising.

"There is no URL in existence, and you made the post up just to
denigrate an institution you know absolutely nothing about (and
cannot even distinguish from Ohio  University). You are, pure and
simple, a
bare faced liar. Case proven and closed".




>
> "I can not think of any other place that is more ideal for a
> college education. Ohio State has offered me unboundless opportunities
> on beautiful campus, in a great city. I have not met (nor heard of) one
> student that dislikes going here. Each and every one of the students
> here is incredibly friendly and approachable. Even though the students
> are aplenty, the class sizes remain small (only one or two major lecture
> classes in first year). The academics are stimulating and interesting,
> something I did not especially expect coming into a university of this
> size. Ohio State offers incredible academic support...I have never gone
> into a class not understanding any of the material. The professors here
> are top-notch and truly care about their students.
>
> The school spirit here and the tradition are contagious, as people are
> overflowing with spirit for the Buckeyes. The athletic programs are
> great, with a beautiful RPAC (recreation center) and a newly built
> McCorkle Aquatic Center. The Horseshoe is one of the most exciting
> venues in all of college football. With everything that this school has
> to offer both inside and outside the classroom, I cannot fathom any
> parent who would be ashamed if their child chose to attend The Ohio
> State University, one of the fastest rising and finest universities
> this country has to offer. This truly is a special place."
>
> No? Noting to say? Why am I not surprised?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > Indeed, so against your worthless post I set many more contrary posts.
> > > > > Either the site is valid (you seem to think so), in which case your
> > > > > attempt to put a university down blows up in your face, or else we can
> > > > > agree that such sites are worthless, and you therefore acknowledge your
> > > > > post as a meaningless attempt to denigrate the university. Either way
> > > > > your original pose comes up way short, and looks petty and dumb.
>
> > > > Again more assumution, I have never claimed the web site is valid or
> > > > invalid. Also I have never attempted to put any university down as you
> > > > claim, I have quoted a student on a website which I have every right
> > > > to do.
>
> > > No, no "assumution", just the obvious that no one would invoke a web
> > > site to try to put a university down and then claim that they "never
> > > claimed it was valid or invalid". Yeah, right. Have a chat with your
> > > "solicitor" friend Marty about rules of evidence and hearsay.
>
> > Again I did not put any university down I postd a quote from a single
> > student.
>
> And ignored the posts from the other 45 who had completely opposite
> opinions. Yeah, no slur intended there alright.
>
>
>
> > "Yeah, right. Have a chat with your 'solicitor friend Marty about
> > rules of evidence and hearsay". So sue me!
>
> You wouldn't be good for the money, apparently.
>
>

lol, so I take it this means you won't be suing me then does it?


>
>
>
>
>
> > > >  "You had a prime chance to put a case forward to show how good Ohio
> > > > State University is though instead revert to childish name calling
> > > > about some person you clearly know nothing about. Clearly a associate
> > > > Dean would have more
> > > > intelligence and not be so obtuse".
>
> > > I have neither the interest nor the time to " put a case forward to show
> > > how good (The) Ohio State University is" to some one who has
> > > demonstrated he doesn't know the first thing about it or higher
> > > education. What on earth would be the point?
>
> > Well you have been putting a fair bit of effort into making a case as
> > I previously pointed out.
>
> No, just to dismembering the nonsense that you keep posting. That is
> easy - the other would take time and effort, and your opinion simply
> isn't worth that.
>
>

So you where making a case?

>
>
>
>
>
> > > > I would expect more of any offical at any university than to call a
> > > > student an idiot, or dismiss a website without looking at it, being
> > > > unable to find a website despite being informed how too and finally
> > > > resorting to wild assumuptions leading to directly calling a person a
> > > > liar when infact they where telling the truth. Even then having to be
> > > > asked several times to retract their assumption and correcting their
> > > > slur did not even have the deceny to apologise.
>
> > > Oh, dear, now we are playing the wounded martyr again. Boo hoo. What
> > > utter and total drivel.
>
> > A personal attack, I see originality is not one of your redeeming
> > characteristics.
>
> Martyr again. I see recognizing adjectival phrases is not one of your
> strengths.
>
>

Considering your use of grammar I think your in no position to comment
on anyone elses. Maybe you should post something with some original
thought on "unsenet".

We have a grammar and spelling flamer who can't spell and makes wild
incorrect statements about grammar. That doesn't make you look too
bright does it.

You have yet to retract this ridculous incorrect statement
"Using 'due to' in place of 'because of' is simply wrong".




>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > > Once again, give me a URL for "Marty's" web site, and we will start
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > "identity" process. The MDA needs the money for sick children.
> > > > > > > Otherwise
> > > > > > > just admit you were wrong, apologize, and get on with your life.
>
> > > > > > Who said Marty has a web site. What makes you think I would give you
> > > > > > his contact details when I will not give you my own!
>
> > > > > Oh, Marty doesn't have a web site? Hmmm, why am I not surprised. If he
> > > > > had one, then it is out there for the entire world to access, so it
> > > > > would be really foolish to suppose that he would somehow come to harm
> > > > > if
> > > > > I saw it, now wouldn't it? Does he do business out of the back of a
> > > > > truck, or does he even exist (as a solicitor) at all? My guess is that
> > > > > he does not.
>
> > > > Well why would he have a web site, I don't have one and I bet the vast
> > > > majority of people on the planet don't either. So your assumution is
> > > > because he does not have a web site he does business out of the back
> > > > of a truck. Why would a solicitor in Derry need a web site.
>
> > > Any business or professional would have one if he existed in the 21st
> > > century.
>
> > lol, Again complete and utter assumption and nonsense. Though it is
> > ironic that you post this considering you use a book published in 1926
> > as a style guide for your English gramar.
>
> Grammar has what to do with today's business practices? Well, at least
> it is clear that "Marty" does not have a web site, and "Marty" is almost
> certainly not a solicitor.
>

Yet again nothing but pure assumption and rubbish. Good for you coming
up the the rule that all solicitors must have websites. Its just one
leap of faith to another with you.


>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > Though I am not surprised you don't really have a good record of
> > > > making assumptions do you.
>
> > > Oh, I have done pretty well in assuming that you will come up with an
> > > infinite variety of tricks and devices to avoid facing the obvious
> > > consequences of your rashness on this one. Batting 100% so far.
>
> > > > So you want me to put a direct contact to a friend on a public forum!
> > > > Sorry I would not put my own up so why would you think I would put the
> > > > address of my friends place of work! I would not be much of a friend
> > > > if I did that would I.
>
> > > Here we go again - weasel, weasel, weasel. He is supposedly a
> > > professional, so I will contact him through his professional offices. He
> > > should be paid, too, by the loser of the wager, That's only fair, isn't
> > > it? He doesn't work for free, does he? If he is actually a solicitor at
> > > all.
>
> > yawn, look I will not hand out my own contact details on here and I
> > will certainly not be handing out a friends. You can make all the
> > assumptions you want we know how good at that you are. Now if you want
> > to prove your identity then do so! Though again you and I both know
> > you cannot this is why your posting all this nonsense, to avoid paying
> > a measly $100 dollars to a terminal illness charity.
>
> Fine, so for the last time - you simply refuse to allow any process that
> will finally reveal the extent of your silly misstatement. I understand
> why you use the moniker "Free"ireland - you don't believe in paying for
> anything.
>

Yawn more childish name calling.

What terms of the wager show you as having you won?


>
>
>
>
> > > > > > Who makes a wager without defining any winning conditions, something
> > > > > > pointed out by me a while ago. Its clear you cannot even prove your
> > > > > > identity never mind anything else so to make a wager that depends on
> > > > > > it was foolish.
>
> > > > > > I have now shown you making spelling errors and making wild
> > > > > > accusations about grammar that are simply incorrect. Clearly you are
> > > > > > no expert on grammar. I have also shown the length you are willing to
> > > > > > go to save what little credibility you have left, from childish name
> > > > > > calling, racial insults to thinly veiled threats.  You do not even
> > > > > > have the integrity to retract wild accusations that you made which
> > > > > > have now been proven wrong.
>
> > > > > Bluster, bluster, bluster all you will, the simple fact remains that
> > > > > you
> > > > > stuck your neck out, rose to a challenge, got royally caught, and ever
> > > > > since have been tying yourself in knots trying to find ways to weasel
> > > > > out of something you should never have said in the first place. All
> > > > > this
> > > > > other twaddle is just your feeble attempt at a smokescreen.
>
> > > > > The MDA is waiting.
>
> > > > More nonsense, ok what terms of the
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -