On 20 Oct, 09:50, "Falcon"  wrote:
> freeireland wrote:
> > On 19 Oct, 23:51, "Falcon"  wrote:
> [...]
> >> Nor is plagiarism.
> >> J'accuse.http://www.barbelith.com/cgi-bin/articles/00000016.shtml
>
> > Thanks for that just forgot a citation nothing more, [...]
> > Take a look at one of your posts, and I quote directly from it, [...]
>
> In the context of the discussion there was no attempt to impress or deceive
> anyone. I don't think the same can be said of your more substantial
> contribution. As for one trying to discredit the other, I think your track
> record is a least as good as mine.
>
> --
> Falcon:
> fide, sed cui vide. (L)

Really you know nothing about me and can have no idea about what my
intentions are. You clearly cut and paste from a web site without
citation and I do believe thats plagerism. You even altered a few
words here and there? You are right I have a record of discreditation
as this plagiarism fiasco shows, after all you where baited, however I
normally only reserve it for people who try to discredit me through
the use of typos, grammar, name calling and association. The only
reason to post another thread calling someone a liar or bastard is so
they have no chance of rebuttal. I have never commented or even
attempted to mention anything about another posters ip address as I
believe it is an attempt of intimidation. However I have always posted
in a manner to allow the author of an post I am responding to a chance
of rebuttal. That is something you are guilty of and in my opinion
deeply dishonest, after all typos, grammatical errors posting without
citiation is quite common throughout all these use-groups and 99% are
honest mistakes and nothing of any concern. These mistakes apply to
all who post here and that include you and I!