On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:09:21 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
wrote:

>Boedicia@isp.com wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 8:55 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."  wrote:
>>> Boedi...@isp.comwrote:
>>>> On Sep 19, 12:30 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:25:53 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:29 -0700, claire.easth...@ntlworld.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 17 Sep, 22:03, "eugene" <eug...@home.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie>"  wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:911te3ls7g3sbstck54fbda8u5k51e21kl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>   I try my best to work with people I feel are of good
>>>>>>>>>> character...
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And over the years, I have found that I'm a good judge of
>>>>>>>>>>> character...
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ray
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This just has to be the funniest thing our little dwarf has
>>>>>>>>>> ever written! I swore I wasn't responding to any more of his
>>>>>>>>>> drivel but I had to share this.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is an aproximation of the sound I made when I read that
>>>>>>>>> bit, it was a very loud PBRHA!!!
>>>
>>>>>>>> Fools are easily amused!  I have a shiny object, wanna look at
>>>>>>>> it for a few hours?
>>>
>>>>>>> WHAT??? Your balls/dickhead?? NO thanks!
>>>
>>>>>> Go sit in the sandbox and let us adults discuss the issues of the
>>>>>> day...  ok?
>>>
>>>>> ADULT??? - Oh, I don't think so!! Your opinions are so bereft of
>>>>> any Christianity and tolerance, and so full of arrogance and
>>>>> confrontationalism that they have lost all credibility. Doesn't it
>>>>> stroke you as very odd that so very many people no longer bother
>>>>> with your posts? It is your whackey ideas and support for stupid
>>>>> opinions, such as total abortion that is to blame. Not practical,
>>>>> no consideration of the mothers health, nothing!
>>>
>>>>   Childbirth is a natural thing, that's why there are
>>>>  people on the planet.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> Removing a child from its
>>>>   mothers womb before its time, results in the death of the child,
>>>> *not* the woman.
>>>
>>> Perfectly correct. But nothing is black and white! - If there were
>>> valid medical reasons that if the pregnancy was allowed to proceed
>>> the mothere would die, for instance, and this does happen now and
>>> again.
>
>I was not even correct here myself!! Millions of women have died, "directly" 
>as a result of having back street abortions done upon them!!

What, dragged in and forced to have an abortion were they?  You know, one day
your out shopping, next thing you know, wack over the head and you wake up in a
baby butchering factory...    <sigh>

>So, you are 
>quite wrong here, women DO die as a result of abortions being incorrectly 
>performed. It is therefor more humane and just to allow abortions by law in 
>certeain circumstances.
>

Back that up with facts, not opinion....


>>
>>   The millions of abortions in most countries in the world
>>   are *not* to save the life of the mother, since,
>>   as I said, childbirth is a natural thing.  They
>>   are being done solely for  conveniences sake
>>   and because governmenst such as the U.S. and Britain
>>  e.g. were coerced into it by the radical feminist
>>  movement.
>
>Total bullshit!
>

Is that the best argument you can present?  You lose!


>>In India and China they are done because
>>  the parents want a male child and with the advent
>>  of machines that show the sex of the child, the
>>  parents are able to know what sex the child will be.
>
>
>That is true. However, I would go for an abortion rather than killing the 
>child later, or selling it off to the sex market!
>

Chinese mothers can't wait for their babies to be born so they can kill them or
sell them for sex...   <shakes head>  This artument beggers belief Harry!


>>   By the time that this is possible, the baby is fully formed.  It is
>> a disgusting thing to do to an unborn
>>  baby and those reponssible should be ashamed of
>>  themselves.
>
>Possibly. But a fully formed abortion is not usually allowed.

Should NEVER be allowed!!!

> Up to twenty  weeks is allowed,

What about premature born babies, should we let them die to keep the stats even
Harry?

> but that is still when the child is fully formed. However, 
>if there is something badly wrong with the child, IMO it is a far kinder and 
>humane act to abort it, even at that stage. After all nature herself (God?) 
>aborts faulty foetus whenever she can.

Let's email Stephen Hawkins and ask him about that shall we Harry?


>>  What then? As a
>>> husband, I would prefer my Wife to keep her life and try again
>>> another
>>> day! - OR - Just suppose your daughter had been savagly raped and
>>> beaten and left pregnant? Would you want her to go through nine
>>> months of further torture and be left to rear the child of her
>>> abuser, possibly causing permanent pschycological damage? - I
>>> certainly wouldn't.
>>
>>   That's a red herring and used by those who use every
>>  silly thing at their disposal to state their case.
>
>No, it not a red herring. It is a situation that occurrs all the time, and 
>is perfectly valid as a reason.
>

Evidence?

>>   The facts are that it takes several days *after*
>>  intercourse for the sperm to reach an ovulating egg.
>>  Rapists do not stick around after they have raped their victim. The
>> victim should immediately call the police
>>  who will then take her to a rape center for treatment.
>
>Have YOU ever been raped? I doubt it! Silly argument on your part.
>

What a question!  How dare you ask that question!  Your argument is based in
ignorance and you dare to ask that question!  YOu should be ashamed!  Ashamed!
Your a disgrace today Harry...   You should apologise and ask forgivness
immediately!  If your a man that is...  If your a weasel...  I'd expect no such
contemplation of guilt and need to ask for an apology...  Work it out Harry...
Read it slowly...  <geez!!!!>


>>  The treatment prevents conception, so all these
>> rape victims who claim they got pregnant because
>> someone raped them are IMO suspicious victims, especially
>>  when they report the rape months after the event.
>
>Then you are as bad as the rapist.

And your at thick as 10 short planks!!!!

>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>  As to the homosexuals, they should keep their sex lives to
>>>> themselves, if they didn't go around broadcasting it, no-one would
>>>> know, would they?
>>>
>>> Sadly, society simply will not let the gay thing go! - If they did,
>>> then I am sure the necessity to parade and protest would go away.
>>> Gays have every right to be treated equally as are everyone else. As
>>> for "knowing"? - Honestly, who cares? It is their own business after
>>> all.
>>
>>   They carry their demand for equal treatment too far.
>>   They have no need to parade in the clothes of Catholic
>>   nuns showing their disdan for Christianity.
>
>It is a joke. Bad taste, but still a joke!
>

Oh...  thanks for telling us... I've booked my responsive laughter for next
friday at 10.30am and 10.31 am...   You gorm!!


>>They
>>   would not be allowed to do the things they do if they
>>   were *not* homos.
>
>Rubbish! Since when were there any laws against mocking religion?
>

Hint Harry:  Dont' mock the Islamofascists...  They will come and take away your
head...  Be thankful us Christians are more tolerent!  

>>Some of them have actually marched
>>  naked!!  I don't have to remind you that the disease
>>  called AIDS was *their* contribution to mankind. Their
>>  sex lives do *not* consist of a loving partner as some
>>  of them would like you to think,  they have numerous
>>  "partners" as part of their livestyle.  In afct one of them posted
>> that "a 1000 sex partners a year is not unusual......."
>
>And? Are you actually saying that heterosexual males don't do the same?? - I 
>suggest that you grow up!
>

So, Harry, you have 1000 homosexual partners come home and teach you to be a
"good boy" each year?  Do you even read the nonsense you write?


>>
>>>>  No cafe would know if the person they were serving was
>>>>  a homo if the customer didn't tell them.
>>>
>>> LOL! I don't know what sort of cafe "you" go into, but "I" have
>>> never been in one that this problem would ever arise at all. Perhaps
>>> you frequent Gay cafes? Who knows! Their coffee would certainly be
>>> good for sure.
>>
>>    The subject was "discrimination" and being refused
>>    service if it was known they were homos. I said,
>>   that if they didn't broadcast it no-one would ever know
>>   they were homos and thus they wouldn't be refused
>>   service. I don't know any *gay* cafes, if I did I would
>>  stay away from them.
>
>Most Gays do not advertise their sexual prefernces, SFAIK.
>

Thing is NO gay should EVER advertise their weird devient behaviour!

Ray


>Gay pubs"?  Why do they need
>>   their own pubs?
>
>Have you NO common sense? Perfectly obvious, I would have thought. They have 
>to have somewhere that they can meet each other without the fear of chatting 
>up the wrong person. People like you object to them being seen as obvious, 
>after all!


-- 
****************************************************************************************
When anyone asks me about the Irish character, I say look at the trees.
Maimed, stark and misshapen, but ferociously tenacious - Edna O'Brien
****************************************************************************************
Email  : rayh(removeSPAM)@iol.ie : Website: http://www.eirefirst.com
****************************************************************************************

WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:09:21 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
>  wrote:
>
>> Boedicia@isp.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 24, 8:55 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Boedi...@isp.comwrote:
>>>>> On Sep 19, 12:30 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:25:53 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:29 -0700,
>>>>>>>>> claire.easth...@ntlworld.com wrote:

..........."SNIP"...................

Snipped all hysterical nonsense not worth the bother replying to!

"PLOINK"!!!!!!!!!!!!


-- 
Hal Ó Mearadhaigh.

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:19:58 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
wrote:

>WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:09:21 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Boedicia@isp.com wrote:
>>>> On Sep 24, 8:55 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Boedi...@isp.comwrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 19, 12:30 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:25:53 +0100, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh."
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WhiteWolf <rayh<spam>@iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:29 -0700,
>>>>>>>>>> claire.easth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
>
>..........."SNIP"...................
>
>Snipped all hysterical nonsense not worth the bother replying to!
>
>"PLOINK"!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ray 1:0 Harry...

Another Loss for Harry...   Question is..  Will he EVER win a debate?  Stay
tuned...  

Ray
(you dope Harry, we were having a very serious discussoin and you cut and run...
)

-- 
****************************************************************************************
When anyone asks me about the Irish character, I say look at the trees.
Maimed, stark and misshapen, but ferociously tenacious - Edna O'Brien
****************************************************************************************
Email  : rayh(removeSPAM)@iol.ie : Website: http://www.eirefirst.com
****************************************************************************************