Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
soc
community.ambulance
community.childcare
community.firefighting
community.policing
community.social-housing
community.voluntary
culture.arts.storytelling
culture.arts.theatre
culture.arts.writing
culture.lang.english
culture.museums
culture.nostalgia.1980s
cur.-events.us-bombing
current-events.general
current-events.n-ireland
current-events.terrorism
food+drink.chocolate
food+drink.indian
food+drink.misc
food+drink.real-ale
food+drink.restaurants
  
 
date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:41:56 -0700,    group: uk.culture.language.english        back       
Re: optimal vs. optimized [was: Re: string concatentation...]   
> Even though you are using the news client of the clueless,
> groups.google.com, you can avoid being tarred with that brush if you
> learn how to use it.  One of the most important is to snip away all but
> those sections of the original post except those necessary and germane
> to you response.  Quoting the whole original post only to add your own
> tiny bit to the end is unnecessary and, in fact, rude.

Right. though that was not my point.

I wanted to tell about teaching vocabulary. I teach vocabulary to
students and take help of different sites. Some of them like
www.ultimatevocabulary.com
www.vocabularysoftware.net
www.buildingvocabulary.org
www.ultimatespelling.com
www.vocabularybuilder.info
date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:41:56 -0700   author:   teachingvocabulary

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us