Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
soc
community.ambulance
community.childcare
community.firefighting
community.policing
community.social-housing
community.voluntary
culture.arts.storytelling
culture.arts.theatre
culture.arts.writing
culture.lang.english
culture.museums
culture.nostalgia.1980s
cur.-events.us-bombing
current-events.general
current-events.n-ireland
current-events.terrorism
food+drink.chocolate
food+drink.indian
food+drink.misc
food+drink.real-ale
food+drink.restaurants
  
 
date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:29:10 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.community.policing        back       
Random phonebook reporting: How to dismantle the sinister practice of "guilty before innocent"?   
HMRC, NSPCC, RSPCA, parking wardens, local authorities and so on are
all examples of a blight creeping across a previously freer country.
These institutions act, to varying degrees, on the basis of presumed
guilt or have officials operating under a unitary judge-jury-and-
executioner system.

The best remedy to a system of presumed guilt, of course, is to give
these Gestapo just what they want and turn everyone into suspects. The
result will be such an overload of cases that they have to go back to
how things best worked in the past: guilty before innocent.
Busybodies, slanderers, malicious gossips, incompetents and plain
idiots will have to produce some shred of evidence of misdemeanor,
which should separate the wheat from the chaff.

It would take an inordinate and quite possibly impossible amount of
political clout to reverse the decline of our freedoms. However, by
demonstrating how impractical a system of presumed guilt is, perhaps
we can force some sense into the system.

Pick up your phone books, chaps! Anonymous email accounts (hide your
IP address through a proxy), letters with random return addresses
(wear gloves) and phone calls using voice synthesisers and cash
prepaid PAYG phones are the way to go.

N5
date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:29:10 -0700 (PDT)   author:   November 5

Re: Random phonebook reporting: How to dismantle the sinister practice of "guilty before innocent"?   
"November 5"  wrote in message 
news:85edff37-87c4-488f-9efc-c416426ecb96@k41g2000vbt.googlegroups.com...
> HMRC, NSPCC, RSPCA, parking wardens, local authorities and so on are
> all examples of a blight creeping across a previously freer country.
> These institutions act, to varying degrees, on the basis of presumed
> guilt or have officials operating under a unitary judge-jury-and-
> executioner system.
>
> The best remedy to a system of presumed guilt, of course, is to give
> these Gestapo just what they want and turn everyone into suspects. The
> result will be such an overload of cases that they have to go back to
> how things best worked in the past: guilty before innocent.
> Busybodies, slanderers, malicious gossips, incompetents and plain
> idiots will have to produce some shred of evidence of misdemeanor,
> which should separate the wheat from the chaff.
>
> It would take an inordinate and quite possibly impossible amount of
> political clout to reverse the decline of our freedoms. However, by
> demonstrating how impractical a system of presumed guilt is, perhaps
> we can force some sense into the system.
>
> Pick up your phone books, chaps! Anonymous email accounts (hide your
> IP address through a proxy), letters with random return addresses
> (wear gloves) and phone calls using voice synthesisers and cash
> prepaid PAYG phones are the way to go.
>
> N5

Ihr Name wird auch gehen auf der Liste. Was ist das?


-- 
Graham.

%tiefe_Beobachtung%
date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:27:21 +0100   author:   Graham.

Re: Random phonebook reporting: How to dismantle the sinister practice of "guilty before innocent"?   
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:29:10 -0700 (PDT), November 5
 wrote:

>HMRC, NSPCC, RSPCA, parking wardens, local authorities and so on are
>all examples of a blight creeping across a previously freer country.
>These institutions act, to varying degrees, on the basis of presumed
>guilt or have officials operating under a unitary judge-jury-and-
>executioner system.
>
>The best remedy to a system of presumed guilt, of course, is to give
>these Gestapo just what they want and turn everyone into suspects. The
>result will be such an overload of cases that they have to go back to
>how things best worked in the past: guilty before innocent.
>Busybodies, slanderers, malicious gossips, incompetents and plain
>idiots will have to produce some shred of evidence of misdemeanor,
>which should separate the wheat from the chaff.
>
>It would take an inordinate and quite possibly impossible amount of
>political clout to reverse the decline of our freedoms. However, by
>demonstrating how impractical a system of presumed guilt is, perhaps
>we can force some sense into the system.
>
>Pick up your phone books, chaps! Anonymous email accounts (hide your
>IP address through a proxy), letters with random return addresses
>(wear gloves) and phone calls using voice synthesisers and cash
>prepaid PAYG phones are the way to go.
>
>N5

You'll like this, N5!
http://www.visual.basic.freeuk.com/NewProp.pdf

(Make sure you use the capitalisation in the URL!)

MM
date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:22:54 +0100   author:   MM

Re: Random phonebook reporting: How to dismantle the sinister practice of "guilty before innocent"?   
G
>>
>> N5
> 
> Ihr Name wird auch gehen auf der Liste. Was ist das?
> 
> 
Don't tell him Pike
date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:17:36 +0100   author:   Rob

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us