The tragedy is not only that these scumbags (and others who remain
uncaught) defraud the system, but also that an entire menagerie of non-
jobs were created to:

1) Collect the taxes to pay for people such as this,
2) Review cases "worthy" of benefits,
3) Disseminate the money
4) Investigate benefits fraud.

All of these non-jobs and lazy/fraudulent people could be doing real
jobs if we scrapped the benefits system and fostered a culture of self-
reliance and responsibility.

Instead we have a taxed economy burdened with parasites and non-jobs,
and Little Nazis running around snooping on people.


http://tinyurl.com/ctcfbb

Yachting benefit fraud couple jailed
A couple who sailed part way around the world on a £100,000 yacht
while claiming more than £50,000 in benefits have been jailed.
By Richard Savill
Last Updated: 6:50PM GMT 20 Mar 2009

Benefits cheats Shashi Bacheta and Jeffrey Cole onboard their yacht
Photo: PA

Shashi Bacheta, 52, was sentenced to 21 months at Swansea Crown Court,
while her boyfriend Jeffrey Cole, 58, received nine months.

Bacheta, of Swansea, admitted 16 counts relating to benefit fraud of
about £40,000. Cole, 58, admitted four charges worth about £12,000.

Bacheta claimed she was so ill that she could not even get out of bed,
when she was scuba diving off the coast of Kenya. She even posed for
holiday photographs and kept a log of her diving exploits, which was
later used as proof of her fraud.

While cruising around the Canary Islands on their yacht Kismet, she
claimed housing benefit, council tax relief, and disability living
allowances.

Passing sentence, Judge Huw Davies told her: "You were in perfectly
good health and took active holidays to travel so much of the world.

"You went on safari and sailing the seas in a private yacht.

"You were guilty of a set of cynical offences of defrauding the
benefit system."

The judge said the pair had been living together for five years and
"taking holidays in some considerable style".

He told Cole: "You bought a yacht for £100,000 having sold some of
your properties. You set off to enjoy your personal wealth and money
extracted from public funds."

Swansea Crown Court heard the couple were caught after posing for
photographs while their yacht was moored in Gran Canaria.

Two retired police officers, enjoying a similar around-the-world
adventure, snapped the couple before posting the pictures on their
blog.

Fraud investigators, who had become suspicious of the pair, discovered
the blog while searching on the internet for the Kismet.

The court heard Cole was working as a postmaster in Swansea, and
Bacheta managed the newsagent side of the business.

That's the whole point.

Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold War,
except that Eastern Europe was poorer.

And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
War.

Think of Sonia Szurma:
http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm

And this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related

On 21 Mar, 00:04, Special Care  wrote:
> That's the whole point.
>
> Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold War,
> except that Eastern Europe was poorer.
>
> And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
> puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
> of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
> drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
> War.
>
> Think of Sonia Szurma:http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm
>
> And this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related

You really think Eastern European women are colder than British women?

Have you met many?

PeterSaxton wrote:
> On 21 Mar, 00:04, Special Care  wrote:
>> That's the whole point.
>>
>> Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold
>> War, except that Eastern Europe was poorer.
>>
>> And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
>> puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
>> of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
>> drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
>> War.
>>
>> Think of Sonia Szurma:http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm
>>
>> And this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related
>
> You really think Eastern European women are colder than British women?
>
> Have you met many?

Only if they are wearing white coats.

On 21 Mar, 19:41, PeterSaxton  wrote:
> On 21 Mar, 00:04, Special Care  wrote:
>
> > That's the whole point.
>
> > Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold War,
> > except that Eastern Europe was poorer.
>
> > And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
> > puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
> > of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
> > drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
> > War.
>
> > Think of Sonia Szurma:http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm
>
> > And this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related
>
> You really think Eastern European women are colder than British women?
>
> Have you met many?

Yes, the older generation I mean.

On 21 Mar, 19:49, "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote:
> PeterSaxton wrote:
> > On 21 Mar, 00:04, Special Care  wrote:
> >> That's the whole point.
>
> >> Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold
> >> War, except that Eastern Europe was poorer.
>
> >> And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
> >> puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
> >> of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
> >> drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
> >> War.
>
> >> Think of Sonia Szurma:http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm
>
> >> And this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related
>
> > You really think Eastern European women are colder than British women?
>
> > Have you met many?
>
> Only if they are wearing white coats.
-------------------

Like Gill Langley?

On 22 Mar, 10:32, Special Care  wrote:
> On 21 Mar, 19:49, "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > PeterSaxton wrote:
> > > On 21 Mar, 00:04, Special Care  wrote:
> > >> That's the whole point.
>
> > >> Eastern Europe was no different to Western Europe during the Cold
> > >> War, except that Eastern Europe was poorer.
>
> > >> And the women were a bit colder than our girls, because of the
> > >> puritanical Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, which drove the women
> > >> of Eastern Europe quite insane, just as the Roman Catholic Church
> > >> drove Irish woman insane too during those dreadful years of the Cold
> > >> War.
>
> > >> Think of Sonia Szurma:http://www.yorkshireripper.com/sonia.htm
>
> > >> And this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uI08WUbH0&feature=related
>
> > > You really think Eastern European women are colder than British women?
>
> > > Have you met many?
>
> > Only if they are wearing white coats.
>
> -------------------
>
> Like Gill Langley?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Can you imagine having vaginal intercourse with Gill
Langley............

............considering that Gill Langley is guilty of GENOCIDE on a
much greater scale than Jonas Savimbi, Pol Pot, Josef Stalin..... what
if you made Gill Langley pregant when you have vaginal intercourse
with her.

Rosemary's Baby.

GILL LANGLEY - ENGLANDS PRIMA DONNA OF THE VIVISECTION SYNDICATE.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/msg/968374795fc260a9?&q=imperatrice+nuda+revisited

-------------------------------------------------

reproduced from archive:

-------------------------------------------------

To:
Gill Langley,
Dr Hadwen Trust
-----------------


Dear Mrs Langley,


I thought I should say something to you at this stage.


The first thing is that you are operating a fraudulent charity
by telling naive people that you are campaigning for
'alternatives' to vivisection. The only alternative to
vivisection was found many years ago; it is total abolition now
to save human lives. Yet your fake charity is a great success
financially. More about that later.


The other thing is that I called you a mass murderer in 1986
and that still stands. Vivisection is killing people in vast
numbers; you promote this murdrer by giving plausibility to
vivisection by pretending there is no alternative to it until
we 'find' alternatives, when the alternative is total abolition
now to save human lives.


Pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA / Slaughter of the Innocent'
offer simple proof that Gill Langley and her type are mass
murderers:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Begin extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA by Hans Ruesch, also
titled "Slaughter of the Innocent," pages 9 to 11, upon which
further comment would be superfluous:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"The Great Drug Deception" by Dr Ralph Adam Fine (Stein and
Day, New York, 1972) is just one of the many books published in
the last decade on the subject of dangerous and often lethal
drugs, but it achieved no practical results. Health
authorities, as well as the public, stubbornly refused to take
cognizance of the fact that all those drugs had been okayed and
marketed after having been proved safe for animals. Actually it
is unfair to single out just a few dangerous drugs, since there
are thousands of them.


Of course the fallacy works both ways, precluding the
acceptance of useful drugs. There is the great example of
penicillin - if we want to consider this a useful drug. Its
discoverers said they were fortunate. No guinea pigs were
available for the toxicity tests, so they used mice instead.
Penicillin kills guinea pigs. But the same guinea pigs can
safely eat strychnine, one of the deadliest poisons for humans
- but not for monkeys.


Certain wild berries are deadly for human beings, but birds
thrive on them. A dose of belladona that would kill a man is
harmless for rabbits and goats. Calomelan doesn't influence the
secretion of bile in dogs, but can treble it in man.


The use of digitalis - the main remedy for cardiac patients and
the saviour of countless lives the world over - was retarded
for a long time because it was first tested on dogs, in which
it dangerously raises blood pressure. And chloroform is so
toxic to dogs that for many years this valuable anesthetic was
not employed on patients. On the other hand a dose of opium
that would kill a man is harmless to dogs and chickens.


Datura and henbane are poison for man, but food for the snail.
The mushroom *amanita phalloides*, a small dose of which can
wipe out a whole human family, is consumed without ill effects
by the rabbit, one of the most common laboratory animals. A
porcupine can eat in one lump without discomfort as much opium
as a human addict smokes in two weeks, and wash it down with
enough prussic acid to poison a regiment of soldiers.


The sheep can swallow enormous quantities of arsenic, once the
murderers' favourite poison.


Potassium cyanide, deadly for us, is harmless for the owl, but
one of our common field pumpkins can put a horse into a serious
state of agitation. Morphine, which calms and anesthetizes man,
causes maniacal excitement in cats and mice, but dogs can stand
doses up to 20 times higher than man. On the other hand, our
sweet almonds can kill foxes and chickens, and our common
parsley is poison to parrots.


Robert Koch's Tuberkulin, once hailed as a vaccine against
tuberculosis because it cures TB in guinea pigs, was found
later on to CAUSE TB in man.


There are enough such instances to fill a book - all proving
that it would be difficult to find a more absurd and less
scientific method of medical research (than animal
experimentation).


Moreover, the anguish and sufferings of the animals, deprived
of their natural habitat or habitual surroundings, terrorized
by what they see in the laboratories and the brutalities they
are subjected to, alter their mental balance and organic
reactions to such an extent that ANY result is a priori
valueless.


The laboratory animal is a monster, made so by the
experimenters.


Physically and mentally it has very little in common with a
normal animal, and much less with man.


As even Claude Bernard (1813-1878), founder of the modern
vivisectionist method, wrote in his Physiologie Operatoire
(page 152): "The experimental animal is never in a normal
state. The normal state is merely a supposition, an
assumption."


......................
......................


Somebody launched the idea of breeding strains of
bacteriologically sterile laboratory animals...................


One delusion spawned another. Consistent failure made certain
of those misguided scientists realize - some haven't realized
it yet - that organic "material" raised under such abnormal
conditions differs more than ever from normal organisms.
Animals so raised never develop the natural defence mechanism,
the so-called immunological reaction, which is a salient
characteristic of every living organism. So it would be
difficult to devise a less reliable experimental material.
Besides, animals are by nature immune to most human infections
- diphtheria, thyphus, scarlet fever, German measles, smallpox,
cholera, yellow fever, leprosy and bubonic plague - while other
infections, such as TB and various septicemias, take up
different forms in animals. So the claim that through animals
we can learn to control human diseases could seem a sign of
madness if we didn't know that it is just a pretext for
carrying on "experiments" which, however dangerously misleading
for medical science, are either intimately satisfying for those
who execute them, or highly lucrative.


The Swiss nation illustrates well to what extent the profit
motive promotes vivisection: with a population of less than 6
million, Switzerland uses up annually many times as many
laboratory animals as does all of Soviet Russia with its 250
million inhabitants, but where there is no money in the making
of medicines.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


-End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA / "Slaughter of the
Innocent" by Hans Ruesch, pages 9-11.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Unfortunately, that is not the end of the story.


You and Jan Creamer and Terry Hunt and the gang were
dumbfounded and bewildered when I resigned from antivivisection
activity in 1987. It was the last thing any of you expected and
all your activities such as the fake 'Eleventh Hour Group' and
Jan Creamer's full-page advertisements in the London 'Times'
were built around the assumption that I would keep going
forever.


So why did I abruptly withdraw when we seemed to have you on
the run?


Well, 'The Kathryn Reynolds Show' in the north of England
affected me powerfully. Not Kathryn herself, but her clients. I
could see that they WANTED Kathryn to lead them around in
circles for all eternity to prevent any progress toward the
abolition of vivisection. At the same time they hated me
because I wanted progress. There was no 'market' for what I was
offering.


It was only in 2005 that I finally understood why
antivivisectionists are dedicated to permanent failure of the
antivivisection movement, thus providing ample customers for
your services, Mrs Langley.
We are suffering from collective amnesia resulting in
collective *repetition compulsion* - causing us to strive
unconsciously to recreate the forgotten survivalist emergencies
in which all human behaviour is secretly rooted. And to return
ourselves to a new survivalist emergency, we NEED the avalanche
of 'animal tested' poisons which soon will strangle the earth's
life support system and enable us to relive our terrifying,
forgotten past.


That, briefly, is the explanation for the amazing success of
fraudulent charities such as the Dr Hadwen Trust.


If you had any decency at all, Mrs Langley, you would not take
the blood money. You would instead help people to remember the
hidden wellsprings of human behaviour, help them to understand
why we all indirectly demand the destruction of the ecosystem,
largely via the avalanche of 'animal tested' poisons.


It is clear that bogus antivivisectionists like you, Mrs Langley, are
suffering from a form of *multiple personality disorder* so
that your minds are divided into *idea-tight compartments* and
when you are telling your lies you are cut off from the rest of
your personality and then you transfer to another 'personality'
in which you have no clear memory of what you were doing in the other
compartment of your mind. So the infiltrators in the
antivivisection movement are more mentally ill than the rest of
us. However, you are not going to accept help, so there's not
much more to say.


-----------


I have to go now. I just wanted to say that to you, and also to
say that the charge that you are a mass murderer still stands,
along with all else I've said about your type. You never
answered that charge, because you know it is true. However, I
understand now that the subject is complex, as explained in
those articles. You wont be needing your 'false beard,' Mrs
Langley, although back in 1986 you were terrified that at some
stage you would be sneaking out your back door in a false
beard. We had a bit of a laugh at that. You have to laugh amid
all the tears. But you wont need your false beard, Mrs Langley;
you will just share in the consequences of vivisection when
they start to bite really hard, and you will have to live with
the knowledge that you helped to make it happen and you profited
from torture and murder and from the destruction of the earth's
life support system.


------------------


Just get on with it. Your work will bear fruit soon as the
avalanche of 'animal tested' poisons starts to bite and returns
the human species to a re-run of the forgotten survivalist
emergencies in which all our behaviour is rooted. That's what
we all unconsciously seek. But most of us would not stoop so
low as to profit from it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vivisection: the Hidden Cause of Environmental Pollution:
http://www.vivisectionfraud.com/pollution.html

The Vaccination Fraud (Rattigan / Mendelsohn)
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_126hgz9s8fb

Vivisection - Its Crucial Role in the Scheme of Things
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_83w8mzhvgj

It really is so depressing to see how all the benefits of those
(entirely necessary) sacrifices that were made throughout the Thatcher
years have now all been thrown away by Brown.

It’s as if the previous twenty years of Tory rule never happened from
a basket case to fourth richest country in the World and with public
finances to be proud of and now all thrown away.

Here we are just twelve years later, the economy is a basket case yet
again and we’ve got to do it all over, complete with just as much
suffering and hardship as we saw last time.

It’s enough to make you weep.

On 22 Mar, 22:14, allandetr...@live.co.uk wrote:
>
> Here we are just twelve years later, the economy is a basket case yet
> again and we’ve got to do it all over, complete with just as much
> suffering and hardship as we saw last time.
>
> It’s enough to make you weep.

========

Not really. You need to see the wider picture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Countdown to Dictatorship
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_145g55fgpc9

The Next Nicea
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_41rhfc4hg8