Hi,

It has long been custom within uk.* to check for groups that are not 
being used and then to remove them. By doing this we keep the number of 
dead groups down increasing the chances that someone stumbling across a 
group wil find it useful.

This group appears to have been quiet for a while and has received 0 
posts in the last 3 months. Is there still enough interest to keep the 
group viable or would it be better to remove it and let any relevent 
traffic go to uk.rec.waterways instead?

Details of the formal removal process can be found at
http://www.usenet.org.uk


-- 
Graham Drabble
http://www.drabble.me.uk/

I keep checking and hoping. Maybe some day someone will start posting again.

Burr


"Graham Drabble"  wrote in message 
news:Xns9C97E2835400Cgrahamdrabblelineone@drabble.me.uk...
> Hi,
>
> It has long been custom within uk.* to check for groups that are not
> being used and then to remove them. By doing this we keep the number of
> dead groups down increasing the chances that someone stumbling across a
> group wil find it useful.
>
> This group appears to have been quiet for a while and has received 0
> posts in the last 3 months. Is there still enough interest to keep the
> group viable or would it be better to remove it and let any relevent
> traffic go to uk.rec.waterways instead?
>
> Details of the formal removal process can be found at
> http://www.usenet.org.uk
>
>
> -- 
> Graham Drabble
> http://www.drabble.me.uk/

In message , Just Plain 
Burr  writes
>I keep checking and hoping. Maybe some day someone will start posting again.
As I do.

-- 

Julian Tether
Barge Parglena
e-mail: juliant@parglena.co.uk