Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.

Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
Chester.

I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
the boats and where, and publish it on this group.

Roger.

I have noticed a recent tendency for boaters who moor with fore and aft 
lines at 90 degrees to the boat to use the centre handling line as a third 
mooring line, also perpendicular to the boat.
This ensures that the smallest fore-and-aft movement (which is inevitable 
with perpendiculat lines) is autonmatically converted into a rocking 
movement.
Although this rocking movement will initially be small it should be 
remembered that the boat going past will result in a 
forward-backwards-forwards-backwards pull on the moored boat usually called 
the "forcing frequency" in vibration theory. If the natural frequency of the 
boat surging forwards and backwards on its moorings and it's natural rocking 
frequency happen to resonate with this frequency then there will be a strong 
tendency for the surges to increase rather than fade away, resulting in a 
violent rocking on the boat.
Now comes the interesting (or possibly boring) bit.
The forcing frequency is dependent on many several factors, the length and 
draft of the boat, the depth of water, the profile of the canal and the 
speed of the boat being the most obvious. This means that in some 
circumstances you will cause a greater upset to a boat moored in this way by 
going past slowly than by passing quickly.
It could also mean that a succession of similarly sized boats, all going 
very slowly, could set off this resonant rocking while a single boat going 
much faster will leave the boat effectively undisturbed.

Moral of this story:
Don't moor using your handling rope and make sure you have a decent spring 
angle on your fore and aft ropes. It also helps if your mooring ropes are 
ropes are attached to the boat at the centre-line rather than at the 
gunwales.

Irrelevant PS:
It is for a similar reason that planes cruising at over 350 knots have swept 
back wings. With straight wings certain forms of turbulence would cause the 
wings to resonate, resulting in them flapping themselves off.


-- 

JOhn

NB Ernest (that one, not the other one)

My indecision is final.

Roger Murray wrote:
> Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
> speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
> from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
> of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
> only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
> boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
> But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
> possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
> signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
> nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
> giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
> especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
> at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
> Chester.
>
> I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
> the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>
> Roger.

I just loved the way a grandee of the canals delt with a moorer, when 
passing them on tickover in a certain tarboat :-)

Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)
http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast1.jpg
http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg
-- 
Neil Arlidge
NB Bored
TNC http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/tour.html

John Gwalter wrote:
>
> Irrelevant PS:
> It is for a similar reason that planes cruising at over 350 knots
> have swept back wings. With straight wings certain forms of
> turbulence would cause the wings to resonate, resulting in them
> flapping themselves off.

I'm rather glad about that John, at least Draco won't lose her (actually, it 
was probably a he!) wings as we rarely get to that speed. Can't have our 
dragon turned into the Laidely Worm now can we?

Mike :->

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co,uk

John Gwalter formulated the question :
> I have noticed a recent tendency for boaters who moor with fore and aft lines 
> at 90 degrees to the boat to use the centre handling line as a third mooring 
> line, also perpendicular to the boat.
> This ensures that the smallest fore-and-aft movement (which is inevitable 
> with perpendiculat lines) is autonmatically converted into a rocking 
> movement.
> Although this rocking movement will initially be small it should be 
> remembered that the boat going past will result in a 
> forward-backwards-forwards-backwards pull on the moored boat usually called 
> the "forcing frequency" in vibration theory. 
I have noticed boats moored with their mooring lines running inwards. 
The bow line being attached to the bank some where near the front of 
the cabin and the stern line running forward to be attached to the bank 
ahead of the rear of the cabin. I always run mine out, bow forward and 
stern back. Apart from anything else I would thought that ropes running 
inward presented a greater tripping hazard.

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

"Neil Arlidge"  wrote in message 
news:l4adndzgS94eoG3XnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)

...

> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg

<pedant>


"2 mph", or "2 m.p.h", but *never*  "2.M.P.H."!

</pedant>

-- 
MatSav

MatSav wrote:
> "Neil Arlidge"  wrote in message
> news:l4adndzgS94eoG3XnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)
>
> ...
>
>> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg
>
> <pedant>
>
>
> "2 mph", or "2 m.p.h", but *never*  "2.M.P.H."!
>
> </pedant>

I think they were just shouting...

-- 
Neil Arlidge
NB Earnest
TNC http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/tour.html

Brian on Harnser wrote:

> I have noticed boats moored with their mooring lines running inwards.
> The bow line being attached to the bank some where near the front of
> the cabin and the stern line running forward to be attached to the
> bank ahead of the rear of the cabin. I always run mine out, bow
> forward and stern back. Apart from anything else I would thought that
> ropes running inward presented a greater tripping hazard.

and unless also using springs, the boat would be more prone to see-sawing on 
its mooring.

Good to see you both today

Mike

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co,uk

MatSav wrote:
> "Neil Arlidge"  wrote in message
> news:l4adndzgS94eoG3XnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)
>
> ...
>
>> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg
>
> <pedant>
>
>
> "2 mph", or "2 m.p.h", but *never*  "2.M.P.H."!
>
> </pedant>

How true...

Mike :->

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co,uk

In article , Neil Arlidge
  on Tue, 3 Nov 2009 at 14:26:07 awoke
Nicholas from his slumbers and wrote
>
>I just loved the way a grandee of the canals delt with a moorer, when 
>passing them on tickover in a certain tarboat :-)
>
>Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)

>http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg

I think there is an old joke in there somewhere.  Something along the
lines of "I do not know how she knew, she did not have time."?
-- 
Nicholas David Richards - 

"Où sont les neiges d'antan?"

On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
> Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
> speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
> from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
> of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
> only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
> boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
> But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
> possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
> signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
> nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
> giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
> especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
> at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
> Chester.
>
> I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
> the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>
> Roger.

Call me picky, but you might well end up with a list containing the
names of perfectly innocent moorers, whose name has been added to a
gulty list by some holier-than-thou @rseh*le who will never be
convinced that they ever offend in the first place

On Nov 4, 7:31 am, Zeke  wrote:
> On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
> > speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
> > from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
> > of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
> > only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
> > boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> > Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
> > But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
> > possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
> > signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
> > nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
> > giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
> > especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
> > at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
> > Chester.
>
> > I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
> > the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>
> > Roger.
>
> Call me picky, but you might well end up with a list containing the
> names of perfectly innocent moorers, whose name has been added to a
> gulty list by some holier-than-thou @rseh*le who will never be
> convinced that they ever offend in the first place

Have you ever been driving along a country road Zeke, and coming
across a crouching dog by a farm drive waiting for every approaching
car, so it can dart out and have a good old yap. Well some moorers are
just like that dog, they see every passing boat as a target for their
yapping.

Yes have been a line moorer and have got pissed off with bloody minded
boaters going past at full revs and understand where you are coming
from, but the majority of boats do slow down.

The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
canal.

Forget about the list, just the heat of the moment.

Roger.

On Nov 3, 2:12 pm, "John Gwalter"  wrote:

>
> Irrelevant PS:
> It is for a similar reason that planes cruising at over 350 knots have swept
> back wings. With straight wings certain forms of turbulence would cause the
> wings to resonate, resulting in them flapping themselves off.
>

Ehem.... before Sir (Pedantic) Aide gets hold of this I must gently
point out that swept back wings are in fact designed to reduce
relative airflow, and thus drag and turbulence over the leading edges
at the sacrifice of the coefficient of lift. Wings flapping and
falling off of are simply about strength of structure. That would be
an example of using ropes that are too thin so that they break (blue
string in BWs case). Rather than use this example of how boats should
be tied up, it is a better illustration of why your boat has a pointy
bit at the front instead of a square slab.

With regard to rope springs, usually these are long ties that reach
aft from the bow and forward from the stern of a boat to prevent all
forward and aft motion. They do not prevent the boat from rocking, and
they are not particularly practical for narrowboats, narrow boats or
narrow-boats. At dodgy moorings I use a system of triangulation,
whereby I take two lines out from the nearside mooring post and stem
post, and affix them to the bank at 90 degrees to each other so that
each line is at 45 degrees to the boat, two reaching for'd and two aft
from each post. (It is a mistake to use one line around two mooring
pins and back to the post as the line can then slip.) I find this
method makes the boat secure even where the ground is soft. It still
doesn't stop the boat from rocking when someone goes past at 4mph
though, so please slow down a bit.

thank you

Tone

Hope this helps.

Just reading a book titled "Narrow Boats" by Tom Chaplin. It's a good
job that our canals aren't used commercially anymore. He talks about
boats on the Grand Union going so fast that they would do a lock in 2
1/2 minutes! He also talks about Packet Boats that carried passengers.
They were pulled by galloping horses that were changed every 4 hours
and maintained a speed of 10 miles per hour! They had a scickle-shaped
knife fixed at their bows intended to slice through the tow rope of
any boat that got in their way!
Imagine trying to have a boating holiday with that lot around!! Worse
still imagined being moored up when they went past!

On 4 Nov, 15:46, Les  wrote:
> Just reading a book titled "Narrow Boats" by Tom Chaplin. It's a good
> job that our canals aren't used commercially anymore. He talks about
> boats on the Grand Union going so fast that they would do a lock in 2
> 1/2 minutes! He also talks about Packet Boats that carried passengers.
> They were pulled by galloping horses that were changed every 4 hours
> and maintained a speed of 10 miles per hour! They had a scickle-shaped
> knife fixed at their bows intended to slice through the tow rope of
> any boat that got in their way!
> Imagine trying to have a boating holiday with that lot around!! Worse
> still imagined being moored up when they went past!

The record for Hatton is under 1 hour!

on 03/11/2009, Mike & Krystyna Wooding supposed :
> Brian on Harnser wrote:
>
>> I have noticed boats moored with their mooring lines running inwards.
>> The bow line being attached to the bank some where near the front of
>> the cabin and the stern line running forward to be attached to the
>> bank ahead of the rear of the cabin. I always run mine out, bow
>> forward and stern back. Apart from anything else I would thought that
>> ropes running inward presented a greater tripping hazard.
>
> and unless also using springs, the boat would be more prone to see-sawing on 
> its mooring.
>
That was my thoughts, it just didn't look right.

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

Roger Murray formulated on Wednesday :

>
> The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
> miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
> boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
> slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
> curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
> told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
> canal.
>

It must have been raining to hard for him when we went passed. We 
counted how many boats were moored there as we went by.

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

The message <0027af53$0$2619$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
from Brian on Harnser  contains these words:

> > The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
> > miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
> > boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
> > slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
> > curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
> > told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
> > canal.
> >

> It must have been raining to hard for him when we went passed. We 
> counted how many boats were moored there as we went by.

Either Golden Nook or Egg bridge moorings, I think. I used to moor just
north of Chester and have to go past the damn things every time I went
anywhere.  i think everyone starts slow and then gradually speeds up
when they realuise that there is no end in sight.

I think they used to be just one side of the bridge, and then they
spread to the other side, and then another field got added.  I have
always moored on linear moorings, but short ones - I can't blame anyone
speeding past a line as long as that one.

-- 

                    Arthur Marshall           
              nb Lord Byron's Maggot
            arthur@barndancer.co.uk
                www.ktblarney.co.uk
              www.barndancer.co.uk
       www.myspace.com/arthurhimself

Arthur Marshall laid this down on his screen :

>
> I think they used to be just one side of the bridge, and then they
> spread to the other side, and then another field got added.  I have
> always moored on linear moorings, but short ones - I can't blame anyone
> speeding past a line as long as that one.

The liniear moorings just on the off side between Stretton and Ansty 
have recently got longer.

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

On 4 Nov, 13:20, Roger Murray  wrote:
> On Nov 4, 7:31 am, Zeke  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
>
> > > Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
> > > speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
> > > from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
> > > of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
> > > only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
> > > boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> > > Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
> > > But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
> > > possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
> > > signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
> > > nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
> > > giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
> > > especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
> > > at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
> > > Chester.
>
> > > I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
> > > the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>
> > > Roger.
>
> > Call me picky, but you might well end up with a list containing the
> > names of perfectly innocent moorers, whose name has been added to a
> > gulty list by some holier-than-thou @rseh*le who will never be
> > convinced that they ever offend in the first place
>
> Have you ever been driving along a country road Zeke, and coming
> across a crouching dog by a farm drive waiting for every approaching
> car, so it can dart out and have a good old yap. Well some moorers are
> just like that dog, they see every passing boat as a target for their
> yapping.
>
> Yes have been a line moorer and have got pissed off with bloody minded
> boaters going past at full revs and understand where you are coming
> from, but the majority of boats do slow down.
>
> The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
> miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
> boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
> slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
> curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
> told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
> canal.
>
> Forget about the list, just the heat of the moment.
>
> Roger.

Yes I do understand the yappy dog syndrome.  However, the idea of
naming and shaming those owners of moored boats who do protest at
boats passing at excessive speeds is fundamentally flawed.  Yes, the
majority of boaters are considerate, and do slow down, even if
sometimes their reduction in speed is insufficient.  Trouble is, the
'naming and shaming' idea would give the minority of truly
inconsidreate boaters - lets call them aresholes - the opportunity to
publicly pillory those who, with good reason, object to their anti-
social behaviour.  Or should we all suffer in silence at any bad
behaviour?  Let's not go there eh?

"Les"  wrote in message 
news:7d1516b5-4169-4263-872c-132884d755e9@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> Just reading a book titled "Narrow Boats" by Tom Chaplin. It's a good
> job that our canals aren't used commercially anymore. He talks about
> boats on the Grand Union going so fast that they would do a lock in 2
> 1/2 minutes! He also talks about Packet Boats that carried passengers.
> They were pulled by galloping horses that were changed every 4 hours
> and maintained a speed of 10 miles per hour! They had a scickle-shaped
> knife fixed at their bows intended to slice through the tow rope of
> any boat that got in their way!
> Imagine trying to have a boating holiday with that lot around!! Worse
> still imagined being moored up when they went past!
>

Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago) there 
was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of "flyboat" 
service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the morning of Day 1, 
lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary for the first night stop. 
Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second 
overnight stop was taken at Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the 
third night stop at Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde 
was reached that night.

These remarkable times were achieved by using a pool of 40 boats circulating 
the canal.  At staircase locks the passengers disembarked and carried their 
bags up or down the locks before boarding another boat to save time.  Even 
so, 4 days is a remarkable achievement to travel approximately 240 kms and 
pass through nearly 80 lock chambers on the original route of the canal.

Mike Ricketts
NB Kinsarvik
Canal de Garonne

"Zeke"  wrote in message 
news:ae423905-0295-4dbd-b47c-bf107c6d6f82@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On 4 Nov, 13:20, Roger Murray  wrote:
> On Nov 4, 7:31 am, Zeke  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
>
> > > Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
> > > speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
> > > from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
> > > of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
> > > only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
> > > boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> > > Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
> > > But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
> > > possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
> > > signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
> > > nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
> > > giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
> > > especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
> > > at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
> > > Chester.
>
> > > I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
> > > the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>
> > > Roger.
>
> > Call me picky, but you might well end up with a list containing the
> > names of perfectly innocent moorers, whose name has been added to a
> > gulty list by some holier-than-thou @rseh*le who will never be
> > convinced that they ever offend in the first place
>
> Have you ever been driving along a country road Zeke, and coming
> across a crouching dog by a farm drive waiting for every approaching
> car, so it can dart out and have a good old yap. Well some moorers are
> just like that dog, they see every passing boat as a target for their
> yapping.
>
> Yes have been a line moorer and have got pissed off with bloody minded
> boaters going past at full revs and understand where you are coming
> from, but the majority of boats do slow down.
>
> The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
> miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
> boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
> slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
> curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
> told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
> canal.
>
> Forget about the list, just the heat of the moment.
>
> Roger.

Yes I do understand the yappy dog syndrome.  However, the idea of
naming and shaming those owners of moored boats who do protest at
boats passing at excessive speeds is fundamentally flawed.  Yes, the
majority of boaters are considerate, and do slow down, even if
sometimes their reduction in speed is insufficient.  Trouble is, the
'naming and shaming' idea would give the minority of truly
inconsidreate boaters - lets call them aresholes - the opportunity to
publicly pillory those who, with good reason, object to their anti-
social behaviour.  Or should we all suffer in silence at any bad
behaviour?  Let's not go there eh?
Fom what everyone has said about 'On Line Moorings' the main problem would 
be the length of the on line mooring. Would it be possible and practical to 
limit the length of any on line mooring and then have a minimum length 
before the next on line mooring? This length between the on line mooring 
would also give the travelling boat a chance to moor for the night.
Regards
Robert (A frequent renter over the last 30 years!)

Mike Ricketts formulated on Thursday :

>
> Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago) there 
> was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of "flyboat" 
> service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the morning of Day 1, 
> lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary for the first night stop. 
> Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second 
> overnight stop was taken at Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the 
> third night stop at Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde 
> was reached that night.
>
snip
>
I just need to check with the other Mike, but I think we only took 
slightly longer than that when we did it l-) l-) l-)

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

Brian on Harnser wrote:
> Mike Ricketts formulated on Thursday :
>
>>
>> Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago)
>> there was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of
>> "flyboat" service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the
>> morning of Day 1, lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary
>> for the first night stop. Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at
>> Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second overnight stop was taken at
>> Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the third night stop at
>> Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde was reached
>> that night.
> snip
>>
> I just need to check with the other Mike, but I think we only took
> slightly longer than that when we did it l-) l-) l-)

We did it in a pretty nifty 11 days Brian :->

Must have been all the red wine you kept making David and I buy .....

Mike

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co.uk

"Mike & Krystyna Wooding" <mikeand krystyna@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:7lgn34F3e8dt0U1@mid.individual.net...
> Brian on Harnser wrote:
>> Mike Ricketts formulated on Thursday :
>>
>>>
>>> Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago)
>>> there was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of
>>> "flyboat" service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the
>>> morning of Day 1, lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary
>>> for the first night stop. Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at
>>> Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second overnight stop was taken at
>>> Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the third night stop at
>>> Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde was reached
>>> that night.
>> snip
>>>
>> I just need to check with the other Mike, but I think we only took
>> slightly longer than that when we did it l-) l-) l-)
>
> We did it in a pretty nifty 11 days Brian :->
>
> Must have been all the red wine you kept making David and I buy .....
>
In March 2008, we moved Kinsarvik to Meilhan starting on the day the CdM 
opened to normal navigation.  Setting off from Porte Minervois next to the 
Cesse Aqueduct, we arrived in Toulouse in 5 days.

Allowing another 2 days if we had set off from Agde, that would still have 
been 7 days.  We were at the locks at 0900hrs each day and cruised to cease 
play at 1800hrs.  In most cases we had lunch at a lock ready to be off again 
at 1330hrs.

Given that we were following the "modern" route and crossing rivers by 
aqueduct etc, I still think it was a remarkable achievement.  Obviously if 
the locks were open longer, you could reduce the time further.

The method used by Brian, ie to use red wine to reduce the memory of the 
journey, does not really count in real time!!!

Mike Ricketts
NB Kinsarvik
Canal de Garonne

Mike Ricketts has brought this to us :
> "Mike & Krystyna Wooding" <mikeand krystyna@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
> news:7lgn34F3e8dt0U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Brian on Harnser wrote:
>>> Mike Ricketts formulated on Thursday :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago)
>>>> there was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of
>>>> "flyboat" service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the
>>>> morning of Day 1, lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary
>>>> for the first night stop. Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at
>>>> Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second overnight stop was taken at
>>>> Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the third night stop at
>>>> Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde was reached
>>>> that night.
>>> snip
>>>>
>>> I just need to check with the other Mike, but I think we only took
>>> slightly longer than that when we did it l-) l-) l-)
>>
>> We did it in a pretty nifty 11 days Brian :->
>>
>> Must have been all the red wine you kept making David and I buy .....
>>
> In March 2008, we moved Kinsarvik to Meilhan starting on the day the CdM 
> opened to normal navigation.  Setting off from Porte Minervois next to the 
> Cesse Aqueduct, we arrived in Toulouse in 5 days.
>
> Allowing another 2 days if we had set off from Agde, that would still have 
> been 7 days.  We were at the locks at 0900hrs each day and cruised to cease 
> play at 1800hrs.  In most cases we had lunch at a lock ready to be off again 
> at 1330hrs.
>
> Given that we were following the "modern" route and crossing rivers by 
> aqueduct etc, I still think it was a remarkable achievement.  Obviously if 
> the locks were open longer, you could reduce the time further.
>
> The method used by Brian, ie to use red wine to reduce the memory of the 
> journey, does not really count in real time!!!
>
> Mike Ricketts
> NB Kinsarvik
> Canal de Garonne

But we were stuck for 24 hrs because the air traffic controllers were 
on strike, which for some reason meant the lock keepers were as well.

-- 
Brian traveling on Harnser
 http://nbharnser.blogspot.com/

"Brian on Harnser"  wrote in message 
news:013898f9$0$12684$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Mike Ricketts has brought this to us :
>> "Mike & Krystyna Wooding" <mikeand krystyna@googlemail.com> wrote in 
>> message news:7lgn34F3e8dt0U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Brian on Harnser wrote:
>>>> Mike Ricketts formulated on Thursday :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not long after the opening of the Canal du Midi (over 300 years ago)
>>>>> there was a service called "le barque de poste".  It was a type of
>>>>> "flyboat" service (not a postal service) that left Toulouse on the
>>>>> morning of Day 1, lunched at Negra before arriving at Castelnaudary
>>>>> for the first night stop. Departing on Day 2, lunch was taken at
>>>>> Ecluse de Beteille,  and the second overnight stop was taken at
>>>>> Trebes.  Day 3 saw lunch at La Redorte with the third night stop at
>>>>> Le Somail.  For Day 4, lunch was at Fonserannes and Agde was reached
>>>>> that night.
>>>> snip
>>>>>
>>>> I just need to check with the other Mike, but I think we only took
>>>> slightly longer than that when we did it l-) l-) l-)
>>>
>>> We did it in a pretty nifty 11 days Brian :->
>>>
>>> Must have been all the red wine you kept making David and I buy .....
>>>
>> In March 2008, we moved Kinsarvik to Meilhan starting on the day the CdM 
>> opened to normal navigation.  Setting off from Porte Minervois next to 
>> the Cesse Aqueduct, we arrived in Toulouse in 5 days.
>>
>> Allowing another 2 days if we had set off from Agde, that would still 
>> have been 7 days.  We were at the locks at 0900hrs each day and cruised 
>> to cease play at 1800hrs.  In most cases we had lunch at a lock ready to 
>> be off again at 1330hrs.
>>
>> Given that we were following the "modern" route and crossing rivers by 
>> aqueduct etc, I still think it was a remarkable achievement.  Obviously 
>> if the locks were open longer, you could reduce the time further.
>>
>> The method used by Brian, ie to use red wine to reduce the memory of the 
>> journey, does not really count in real time!!!
>>
>> Mike Ricketts
>> NB Kinsarvik
>> Canal de Garonne
>
> But we were stuck for 24 hrs because the air traffic controllers were on 
> strike, which for some reason meant the lock keepers were as well.
>
> -- 
And almost certainly La Poste.  I think it is all done on a rota!!

Mike

Brian on Harnser wrote:

>
> But we were stuck for 24 hrs because the air traffic controllers were
> on strike, which for some reason meant the lock keepers were as well.

But it was a nice village as I remember

Mike

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co.uk

"Robert Oliver"  wrote in message 
news:l8AIm.74634$KU2.44432@newsfe26.ams2...
>
> "Zeke"  wrote in message 
> news:ae423905-0295-4dbd-b47c-bf107c6d6f82@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 4 Nov, 13:20, Roger Murray  wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 7:31 am, Zeke  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
>>
>> > > Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
>> > > speeding boats. I don't want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I 
>> > > am
>> > > from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a 
>> > > number
>> > > of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their 
>> > > boat
>> > > only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
>> > > boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.

We had a number of moored boaters on a nearby river who frequently 
complained about the wash from 14 foot sailing dinghies
as we went by. On one occasion when the safety boat was used in anger to 
rescue some drowning people one guy
had complete apoplexy, jumping up and down on our jetty threatening to thump 
everyone in sight. The safety boat planing
at 15 knots makes no wash to speak of at all.

TonyB

In message , TonyB 
 writes
>We had a number of moored boaters on a nearby river who frequently 
>complained about the wash from 14 foot sailing dinghies
>as we went by. On one occasion when the safety boat was used in anger 
>to rescue some drowning people one guy
>had complete apoplexy, jumping up and down on our jetty threatening to 
>thump everyone in sight. The safety boat planing
>at 15 knots makes no wash to speak of at all.
>
Must be a different type to the ribs the Sapeurs Pompiers use in France, 
then. There's nothing better for them than to enjoy a warm summer's 
evening carrying out 'exercises' on their local river, moored boats or 
not.
-- 
David Long
Sankey Canal Restoration Society http://www.scars.org.uk/
A Road to Wigan Pier Webcam: http://www.scars.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/webcam/
St. Mary's Church: http://www.acny.org.uk/venue.php?V=15337&P=1

Neil Arlidge wrote:
> Roger Murray wrote:
>> Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
>> speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
>> from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
>> of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
>> only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
>> boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>>
>> Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
>> But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
>> possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
>> signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
>> nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
>> giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
>> especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
>> at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
>> Chester.
>>
>> I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
>> the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>>
>> Roger.
> 
> I just loved the way a grandee of the canals delt with a moorer, when 
> passing them on tickover in a certain tarboat :-)
> 
> Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)
> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast1.jpg
> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg


and some enjoy a good w*nk.

In article <WXbJm.24869$1g6.19711@newsfe10.iad>, circusjim
  on Sat, 7 Nov 2009 at 10:27:04 awoke Nicholas from
his slumbers and wrote
>Neil Arlidge wrote:
>> Roger Murray wrote:
>>> Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
>>> speeding boats. I don’t want to be out on a limb, which I suppose I am
>>> from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a number
>>> of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their boat
>>> only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
>>> boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>>>
>>> Yes, some boats with total disregard go flat out past moored boats,
>>> But I am sure the majority throttle down and go as slow as reasonably
>>> possible, but there is still the abuse from the odd moored boat. V
>>> signs, swearing and even things thrown. Those people are a bloody
>>> nuisance and should not be on a boat! They spoil it for everybody by
>>> giving line moorers a bad name and make it a pain for those passing,
>>> especially when the line of boats seems to go on forever like the one
>>> at Golden Mile or whatever they call it on the Shroppie just before
>>> Chester.
>>>
>>> I think we just draw up a list of known bloody minded moorers, name
>>> the boats and where, and publish it on this group.
>>>
>>> Roger.
>> 
>> I just loved the way a grandee of the canals delt with a moorer, when 
>> passing them on tickover in a certain tarboat :-)
>> 
>> Here are some boat-whinge signs to further "fuel" debate ;-)
>> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast1.jpg
>> http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/Stuffimages/Fast2.jpg
>
>
>and some enjoy a good w*nk.

And what is wrong with a wonk, cooked long and slow, unless it is tipped
on the floor by a passing turbot on a fast tickover ;-)
-- 
Nicholas David Richards - 

"Où sont les neiges d'antan?"

David Long wrote:
> In message , TonyB
>  writes
>>We had a number of moored boaters on a nearby river who frequently
>>complained about the wash from 14 foot sailing dinghies
>>as we went by. On one occasion when the safety boat was used in anger
>>to rescue some drowning people one guy
>>had complete apoplexy, jumping up and down on our jetty threatening to
>>thump everyone in sight. The safety boat planing
>>at 15 knots makes no wash to speak of at all.
>>
> Must be a different type to the ribs the Sapeurs Pompiers use in
> France, then. There's nothing better for them than to enjoy a warm
> summer's evening carrying out 'exercises' on their local river,
> moored boats or not.

or the saftey boats used on the Thames, but being on deep water it neither 
affected Janna nor Draco to any extent

Mike

-- 

Mike & Krystyna Wooding
nb Draco:  http://www.draco.me.uk
Blog:  http://dracostravels.blogspot.com
Draco Crafts: http://www.dracocrafts.co.uk

On 04/11/09 13:20, Roger Murray wrote:
> The little outburst came after painfully traveling on a very wet and
> miserable day past what seemed to be miles of never ending moored
> boats on the Shroppie just before Chester, this I promise was at the
> slowest and most painfull speed possible, to be met by twitching
> curtains and the raised fist of a guy, shouting and hollering. I am
> told that he has a go at every passing boat. He shouldn't be on the
> canal.

It doesn't just seem like miles, it really is about 1.5 miles, and when
the continuous moorings finish there is still a boat about every 100
yards, so you're constantly speeding up and slowing down again. I
usually try to keep to the far side of the cut past moored boats, but
along there you can't as it's so shallow. I too got shouted at by one
man in one direction there a couple of weeks ago, but I have to confess
I had speeded up a little when I realised how long the moorings were.
I'm not prepared to go past 2 miles of continuously moored boats at 1
mph. On the Llangollen if we tried to go past boats at tickover we
wouldn't make any headway at all against the current. There's a 3/4
empty new marina about half a mile away from the end of these moorings,
he should go in there if he wants it quiet. I can understand that people
who genuinely live on board wouldn't want to live in a marina, but the
majority of boats appear to be empty for the majority of the time and
they should be in marinas when they are unoccupied.

Roger

TonyB wrote:
> "Robert Oliver"  wrote in message
> news:l8AIm.74634$KU2.44432@newsfe26.ams2...
>>
>> "Zeke"  wrote in message
>> news:ae423905-0295-4dbd-b47c-bf107c6d6f82@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> On 4 Nov, 13:20, Roger Murray  wrote:
>>> On Nov 4, 7:31 am, Zeke  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3 Nov, 13:26, Roger Murray  wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Have just been reading all the postings about on line moorings and
>>>>> speeding boats. I don't want to be out on a limb, which I suppose
>>>>> I am
>>>>> from what the general opinion seems to be, but I do feel that a
>>>>> number
>>>>> of moored boaters seem to get unreasonably paranoid even if their
>>>>> boat
>>>>> only moves half an inch because of a passing boat. It's a boat and
>>>>> boats move for gods sake! Otherwise get a caravan.
>
> We had a number of moored boaters on a nearby river who frequently
> complained about the wash from 14 foot sailing dinghies
> as we went by.

Having been a keen dinghy racer myself in years gone by, I know what a 
dreadful wake they make. ;)

 On one occasion when the safety boat was used in anger
> to rescue some drowning people one guy
> had complete apoplexy, jumping up and down on our jetty threatening
> to thump everyone in sight. The safety boat planing
> at 15 knots makes no wash to speak of at all.

I loved that. I can just imagine the scene. How aweful; should have let the 
poor devils drown rather than creating a wake that might disturb someone.

Would have been wonderful if the planking on the jetty gave way!

In a recent message Les  wrote:

> Just reading a book titled "Narrow Boats" by Tom Chaplin. It's a good
> job that our canals aren't used commercially anymore. He talks about
> boats on the Grand Union going so fast that they would do a lock in 2
> 1/2 minutes!

That was when they had decent gate paddles
 
When we first moved onto the Wey in 1978 many locks had four gate paddles, 
and by using them all the locks filled very quickly.

At St. Catherines Lock, which is quite shallow, it was almost impossible 
for me to get the fourth paddle up before the gates started to open!

This was OK for a small 19 foot cruiser like 'Linton', where we could
sit safely at the back of the lock.  For hireboats there was
a strong risk of filling the boat with water, so the NT have
now limited the working paddles to two.  They tried halving
the paddle hole area on Catteshall and Unstead bottom gates, which
dramatically increased the time required to empty the lock - especially
if one paddle was out of order.  The experiment was not
repeated when the gates were replaced.


-- 
Tony Clayton           tony.clayton.1962@pem.cam.ac.uk
Coins of the UK      : http://www.coins-of-the-uk.co.uk
Sent using RISCOS using VirtualAcorn-SA running on a PC
... Rifle Shooters do it lying down.