Is fucktard

":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Is fucktard
>

He is also a lying bastard.

On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
<INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:

>
>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Is fucktard
>>
>
>He is also a lying bastard. 
>

weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.


Gary MacKenzie
Video Editor

"gary mackenzie"  wrote in message 
news:ia6h341b77enc9obrps2uojqv4cg7vnteo@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>
>>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message
>>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>> Is fucktard
>>>
>>
>>He is also a lying bastard.
>>
>
> weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.
>

Depends what you mean by 'truth', no doubt the supporters of Lenin and 
Hitler etc. also considered their pronouncements as the 'truth', OTOH 
anyone who could see beyond the bullshit were just silenced... What Mr 
Roberts didn't like was not how an opinion was being expressed but the 
opinion being held, hence why he is a lair as he was/is trying to make 
out that the opinion was being expressed in an abusive way.

On Sun, 25 May 2008 10:28:41 +0100, ":Jerry:"
<INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:

>
>"gary mackenzie"  wrote in message 
>news:ia6h341b77enc9obrps2uojqv4cg7vnteo@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message
>>>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Is fucktard
>>>>
>>>
>>>He is also a lying bastard.
>>>
>>
>> weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.
>>
>
>Depends what you mean by 'truth', no doubt the supporters of Lenin and 
>Hitler etc. also considered their pronouncements as the 'truth', OTOH 
>anyone who could see beyond the bullshit were just silenced... What Mr 
>Roberts didn't like was not how an opinion was being expressed but the 
>opinion being held, hence why he is a lair as he was/is trying to make 
>out that the opinion was being expressed in an abusive way. 
>
Ah , you would be upset about the fact you said you were leaving a
certain forum site after stirring up lots of trouble , and trying to
make your opinion the only one allowed , and no one asked you to stay.

I don't think it was only Alan Roberts that disagreed with your
attitude ..................
Gary MacKenzie
Video Editor

"gary mackenzie"  wrote in message 
news:ntmi34ppfcro7u7nsttip18jrn7cqijuor@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 25 May 2008 10:28:41 +0100, ":Jerry:"
> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>
>>"gary mackenzie"  wrote in message
>>news:ia6h341b77enc9obrps2uojqv4cg7vnteo@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message
>>>>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>> Is fucktard
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He is also a lying bastard.
>>>>
>>>
>>> weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.
>>>
>>
>>Depends what you mean by 'truth', no doubt the supporters of Lenin 
>>and
>>Hitler etc. also considered their pronouncements as the 'truth', 
>>OTOH
>>anyone who could see beyond the bullshit were just silenced... What 
>>Mr
>>Roberts didn't like was not how an opinion was being expressed but 
>>the
>>opinion being held, hence why he is a lair as he was/is trying to 
>>make
>>out that the opinion was being expressed in an abusive way.
>>
> Ah , you would be upset about the fact you said you were leaving a
> certain forum site after stirring up lots of trouble , and trying to
> make your opinion the only one allowed , and no one asked you to 
> stay.

Unless you or one of your fellow censors have fiddled with the content 
or date stamp on my last message (if not having deleted it from the 
public part of the forum), it will be clear to all who bother reading, 
that I decided that I was not going to stick around in a group were 
arrogant and abusive moderators hold so much power.

>
> I don't think it was only Alan Roberts that disagreed with your
> attitude ..................

Well all that does is prove my point, only those who share the same 
'truth' are allowed to air an opinion. The people with the attitude 
are those who can't accept that others are entitled to an opinion.

":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
news:g1btvt$ctk$5@registered.motzarella.org...
>
<snip>

[ re the DVDoctor forum ]
>
> Well all that does is prove my point, only those who share the same 
> 'truth' are allowed to air an opinion. The people with the attitude 
> are those who can't accept that others are entitled to an opinion.

This problem/attitude born was out of remarks that Bob C [1] made in 
way back in the wake of 9/11 IMO - people where obviously discussing 
the happening on that fatefully day - when someone dared to mention 
something (the, alleged, predictions of Notradarmus) that BC doesn't 
consider important or perhaps doesn't believe such predictions were 
made he quickly acted to delete the comment and ban the user! One only 
has to look at the number of registered users (those with posting 
privileges) against the number of active users - 99% of whom follow 
(either through choice or fear, I don't know) the same moderator/admin 
chosen hymn-sheet - there must be over a 1000 registered users to date 
but probably no more than 40 regular posters, now even accepting a 
certain amount of 'churn' in the user base it's very clear that most 
people are getting frightened off by the over barring moderation 
policy (that has been decided between yourselves), all this on a forum 
that doesn't require registration for *read only* access and were user 
contributed content is the life of the forum... IOW why are so many 
people joining in the wish to both read and contribute but few ever 
do?

Sorry Alan and Garry but neither of you are going to admit that you 
and your fellow mods are the cause and not the solution, it's also 
quite amazing that whilst you ban/delete people for not sharing your 
personal opinions you allow idiots (like Barry) to slag off their 
customers in the wedding section were any Bride or Groom can read what 
their <sic> oh so professional </sic> wedding video-grapher is saying 
about them... I suppose it's down the individual if they want to 
alienate their customer base but it doesn't show others up to well 
either, so much for 'protecting the integrity of the forum...

[1] Bob C, editor of Computer Video Magazine (R.I.P).

":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
news:g1gonu$q2o$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
<snip>
> chosen hymn-sheet - there must be over a 1000 registered users to 
> date but probably no more than 40 regular posters, now even 
> accepting a

I vastly under estimated that, the actual number of registered users 
is over *14,000*...

":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
news:g1btvt$ctk$5@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> "gary mackenzie"  wrote in message 
> news:ntmi34ppfcro7u7nsttip18jrn7cqijuor@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 10:28:41 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"gary mackenzie"  wrote in 
>>>message
>>>news:ia6h341b77enc9obrps2uojqv4cg7vnteo@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>>>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message
>>>>>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> Is fucktard
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>He is also a lying bastard.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Depends what you mean by 'truth', no doubt the supporters of Lenin 
>>>and
>>>Hitler etc. also considered their pronouncements as the 'truth', 
>>>OTOH
>>>anyone who could see beyond the bullshit were just silenced... What 
>>>Mr
>>>Roberts didn't like was not how an opinion was being expressed but 
>>>the
>>>opinion being held, hence why he is a lair as he was/is trying to 
>>>make
>>>out that the opinion was being expressed in an abusive way.
>>>
>> Ah , you would be upset about the fact you said you were leaving a
>> certain forum site after stirring up lots of trouble , and trying 
>> to
>> make your opinion the only one allowed , and no one asked you to 
>> stay.
>
> Unless you or one of your fellow censors have fiddled with the 
> content or date stamp on my last message (if not having deleted it 
> from the public part of the forum), it will be clear to all who 
> bother reading, that I decided that I was not going to stick around 
> in a group were arrogant and abusive moderators hold so much power.
>
>>
>> I don't think it was only Alan Roberts that disagreed with your
>> attitude ..................
>
> Well all that does is prove my point, only those who share the same 
> 'truth' are allowed to air an opinion. The people with the attitude 
> are those who can't accept that others are entitled to an opinion.
>

Lost your tongue Garry?.....

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:40:04 +0100, ":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID>
wrote:

>
>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message 
>news:g1btvt$ctk$5@registered.motzarella.org...
>>
>> "gary mackenzie"  wrote in message 
>> news:ntmi34ppfcro7u7nsttip18jrn7cqijuor@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 10:28:41 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"gary mackenzie"  wrote in 
>>>>message
>>>>news:ia6h341b77enc9obrps2uojqv4cg7vnteo@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:49:19 +0100, ":Jerry:"
>>>>> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:g0skso$ld5$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>> Is fucktard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He is also a lying bastard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> weird , never seen a response from him that was lacking in truth.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Depends what you mean by 'truth', no doubt the supporters of Lenin 
>>>>and
>>>>Hitler etc. also considered their pronouncements as the 'truth', 
>>>>OTOH
>>>>anyone who could see beyond the bullshit were just silenced... What 
>>>>Mr
>>>>Roberts didn't like was not how an opinion was being expressed but 
>>>>the
>>>>opinion being held, hence why he is a lair as he was/is trying to 
>>>>make
>>>>out that the opinion was being expressed in an abusive way.
>>>>
>>> Ah , you would be upset about the fact you said you were leaving a
>>> certain forum site after stirring up lots of trouble , and trying 
>>> to
>>> make your opinion the only one allowed , and no one asked you to 
>>> stay.
>>
>> Unless you or one of your fellow censors have fiddled with the 
>> content or date stamp on my last message (if not having deleted it 
>> from the public part of the forum), it will be clear to all who 
>> bother reading, that I decided that I was not going to stick around 
>> in a group were arrogant and abusive moderators hold so much power.
>>
>>>
>>> I don't think it was only Alan Roberts that disagreed with your
>>> attitude ..................
>>
>> Well all that does is prove my point, only those who share the same 
>> 'truth' are allowed to air an opinion. The people with the attitude 
>> are those who can't accept that others are entitled to an opinion.
>>
>
>Lost your tongue Garry?..... 
>
No , but no point trying to put our opinion over , as you only believe
you are right , and that telling a moderator to 'FO' is a way to deal
with them.


Gary MacKenzie
Video Editor

"gary mackenzie"  wrote in message
news:h6rq4457r2a086ppg2kteo3mrbo0of0n1j@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:40:04 +0100, ":Jerry:"
> <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>
>>Lost your tongue Garry?.....
>>
> No , but no point trying to put our opinion <snip more lies>


No, I very much doubt that you do want to debate this, because you 
know that anything you say will be proven as fact-less and worth-less 
lies. Mr Roberts took exception to me returning the insult that he had 
thrown in my direction...