|
|
|
date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100,
group: uk.rec.ufo
back
Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
???????
date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>???????
NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
than 10 years ago .....
originally posted as an april fools day hoax
back in 1987 , it grew to be a larger than life
government conspiracy hoax over time.
still today many new people that come along
fall into the same old DULCE trap ! a pretty good
accomplishment if you stop to think about it.
most underground base hoaxes come and go with little or no fanfare
( ie: the laughable Tehachapi covert underground complex.
http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/th-intro.html )
few underground bases have more ( totally bogus )
documentation than this one has !
but the dulce hoax has endured over these many years .
it's not easy to keep a hoax going like that ! it takes LOTS of new
people coming along , people totally VOID of
the historical knowledge of the hoax. look how long P.T. Barnum
stared in business ........
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulce_Base
date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700
author: xnickers
|
Re: Anyone interested fascinated by Dulce ?
On Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:58 -0700, xnickers
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:04:50 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>???????
>
>
>NO !!!! it was revealed as a total hoax , more
>than 10 years ago .....
You are wrong
date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:48 +0100
author: unknown
|
|
