Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
rec-misc
aquaria.misc
audio
audio.car
aviation
birdwatching
boats.paddle
boats.power
bodybuilding
collecting.coins
collecting.misc
competitions
crafts
crafts.sewing
drugs.cannabis
engines.stationary
equestrian
gambling.misc
gardening
humour
interior-design
metaldetecting
models.engineering
models.radio-control.air
models.radio-control.land
models.rail
natural-history
naturist
pets.misc
psychic
radio.cb
scuba
sheds
skydiving
subterranea
ufo
video.digital
waterways
waterways.fens
youth-hostel
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:05:10 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.rec.radio.cb        back       
M.I'5`Persecuti on . bugging a nd counter- surveillance   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs. in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if
PO: >I thought that was. happening to me, I'd search the place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know if. anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call. in one of those bug detection teams which
PO: >have those machines that pick up the transmitted. radio waves. This
PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on. BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We went to a. competent, professional detective
agency in London, paid them over 400. quid to debug our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and. would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range, they also checked the phones. and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't. find
anything,. would they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you. that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people. in more
"serious" cases, where they would know. the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they will. have developed techniques
and devices which. are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques might be, I. couldn't guess.

In this case,. the existence of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy. on the
coach.. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail to detect the bugging. devices, causing
loss of credibility to. the other things I would have to say relating to the
harassment.

I did all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find. the
bugs. In addition to calling in professional help using. electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection. of electrical
equipment, plus. any points where audio or video surveillance devices might
have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal. surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible. supporting
circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put. a small video surveillance
device would be. additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically break. in to a property to fit
such a. device.

3884
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:05:10 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us