I'd be grateful for some help in identifying this insect.

http://www.runaid.co.uk/insect

I'm assuming it's of the Order Orthoptera but I cannot match its colour
to anything in my reference books.
--

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
Looks more like Coleoptera to me.

Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.

jimormerod@gmail.com observed
>On Jul 12, 2:05 pm, Peter Elsden  wrote:
>Looks more like Coleoptera to me.
>
>Looks a bit like what we used to call Soldier Beetles as kids.
>
My initial reaction exactly. But it doesn't seem to have the long wing 
covers. I'll see what my book says...

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
-- 
  Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><